DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Temperature on Biology of Different Isolates of Catenaria anguillulae

  • Gupta, R.C. (Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University) ;
  • Singh, K.P. (Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University)
  • Published : 2004.03.31

Abstract

Growth of ten isolates of Catenaria anguillulae on linseed oil-cake agar medium was studied at 10, 13, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 44 and $46^{\circ}C$. The cardinal temperatures of these isolates were also determined. Observations clearly revealed that the isolates differed in their temperature requirements. Isolate GA was found to grow best at $40^{\circ}C$, whereas VF isolate showed best growth at 35 and $40^{\circ}C$. Isolates PA, KA, CHP, KO, MA and SWP grew best at $35^{\circ}C$. The other isolates(KP and MMT) showed their best growth at $30^{\circ}C$. Based on radial growth, isolates were categorized as fast growing, medium growing and slow growing. Studies on effect of different temperatures on pathogenicity was made using only three isolates: VF, KP and MA against Xiphinema basin. VF isolate caused maximum infection at $40^{\circ}C$, whereas KP and MA isolates caused maximum infection at $30^{\circ}C$. The morphology of sporangia varied with temperature in isolates producing elongate-elliptical or filamentous sporangia. In VF isolate the sporangia were largely iilamentous to elongate elliptical at $30^{\circ}C$. The width of the sporangia increased with increasing and decreasing temperatures. At $44^{\circ}C$ the sporangia of this isolate were mostly broadly elliptical or spherical. This clearly indicates that sporangia vary in morphology with temperature. From the morphometrical studies it was understood that sporangial morphology was more consistent and reliable for grouping of isolates. Based on the morphology of sporangia the isolates of C. anguillulae were characterized in three groups viz., Mamentouslelongate elliptical(VF, KA, GA and SWP), spherical(PA, KP, MA and MMT) and vertically elongate sporangia(CHP and KO).

Keywords

References

  1. Barron, G. L. 1977. The nematode destroying fungi. Topics in Mycobiology No.1, 140 P Guelph: Canadian Biological Publication
  2. Brichfield, W. I960a. Growth studies of Catenaria sp. infecting nematodes. Phytopathology 50: 629
  3. Couch, J. N. 1945. Observations on the genus Catenaria. Mycologia. 37: 163-193 https://doi.org/10.2307/3754916
  4. Esser, R. P. and Ridings, W. H. 1973. Pathogenicity of selected nematodes by Catenaria aguillulae. Proceedings of the soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 33: 60-64
  5. Gupta, R. C. and Singh, K. P. 2002. Effect of sodium chloride on biology of Catenaria anguillulae. Mycobiology 30(4): 219-224 https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2002.30.4.219
  6. Jaffee, B. A. 1986. Parasitism of Xiphinema rivesi and Xiphinema americanum by zoosporic fungi. Journal of Nematology 18: 87-95
  7. Karling, J. S. 1977. Iconographia Chytridiomycetearum. Lubrecht & Cramer. Monticello, N. Y. 414 pp
  8. Olson, L. W., Large, L. and Reichle, R. 1978. The zoospore and meiospore of the aquatic phycomycete Catenaria anguillulae. Protoplasma 94: 53-71 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275534
  9. Persmark, L., Mondoza, N. M. and Jansson, H. B. 1995. Nematophagous fungi from agricultural soils of Central America. Nematropica 25: 117-124
  10. Sayre, R. M. and Keeley, L. S. 1969. Factors influencing Catenaria anguillulae infections in a free living and a plant-parasitic nematode. Nematologica 15: 492-502 https://doi.org/10.1163/187529269X00812
  11. Singh, K. P. 1989. Artificial culture of Cataenaria anguillulae from monozoosporangial zoospores. Mycological Research. 92: 107 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(89)80104-2
  12. Singh, K. P. and Gupta, P. 1986. Observataions on Catenaria anguillulae parasitic on Heterodera sorghi. Advances in Biological Research 4: 240-250
  13. Singh, K. P., Bandyopadhyay, P., Stephen, R. A., Vaish, S. S. and Kumar, Makesh T. 1998. Techniques for selective isolation, semiquantification and rapid virulence testing of Catenaria anguillulae. Mycological Research 102: 658-660 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756297005339
  14. Singh, K. P., Stephen, R. A. and Vaish, S. S. 1996. Pathogenicity and development of Catenaria anguillulae on some nematodes. Mycological Research 100: 1204-1206 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80181-X
  15. Sorokin, N. 1876. Note sur les vegetaux parasites des Anguillulae. Annales des Sciences Naturolles, Botanique Ser. 6, 4: 6271
  16. Sparrow, F. K. Jr. 1960. Aqstic Phycomycetes. Ann. Arbor. The University of Michigan press
  17. Stephen, R. A. 1992. Studies on Catenaria anguillulae Sorokin, Ph. D. Thesis, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 1-98
  18. Stirling, A. M. and Platzer, E. G. 1978. Catenaria anguillulae in the mermithid nematode Romanomermis culicivorax. Journal of Invertibrate Pathology 32: 348-354 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(78)90199-4
  19. Vaish, S. S. and Singh, K. P. 2002. Distribution of Catenaria anguillulae Sorokin, a facultative endoparasite of nematodes in soils from different locations of India. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 18: 65-67 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013948129910
  20. VoB, B. and Wyss, U. 1990. Variation between strains of the nematophagous endoparasitic fungus Catenaria anguillulae Sorokin. Factors affecting parasitism In-Vitro. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 97: 416-430

Cited by

  1. Occurrence and colonization of nematophagous fungi in different substrates, agricultural soils and root galls vol.44, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2010.484945