대한안전경영과학회지 (Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science)

  • 제6권3호
  • /
  • Pages.249-273
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1229-6783(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1484(eISSN)
대한안전경영과학회 (Korea Safety Management & Science)
권호 표지

다구찌 기법을 적용한 다기준 의사결정 모형의 신뢰성 향상에 관한 연구

- A Study on Improving Reliability for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Using Taguchi Method -

  • 발행 : 2004.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Finding an optimal solution in MADN[(Multi-Attribute Decision-Making) problems is difficult, when the number of alternatives, or that of attributes is relatively large Most of the existing mathematical approaches arrive at a final solution on the basis of many unrealistic assumptions, without reflecting the decision-maker's preference structure exactly. In this paper we suggest a model that helps us find a group consensus without assessing these parameters in specific cardinal values. Therefore, This research provides a comprehensive Decision Making of the theory and methods applicable to the analysis of decisions that involve risk and multiple criteria attributes. after, The emphasis of the procedure will be on developments from the fields of decisions analysis and utility theory of Taguchi Method. This theoretical development will be illustrated through the discussion of several real-world application and a case study. When the multiple number of decision makers are involved in the decision making procedure, the problem of uncertainties invariably occurs, because of the different views between them. In this paper, New decision making model using Taguchi Method is applied to effectively model the multi-attribute-decision making(MADM) procedure in the uncertainties dominated two area(quantitative and qualitative factors), Quantitative factors evaluation is used Loss Function of Taguchi, qualitative factors evaluation is used 50 ratio by each specialist. thus it can be used for aiding of preferable alternative. as a result, We will be proved efficiency about New decision making model of applied Taguchi Method with Analytical presentation of all the expecting outcomes when a specific strategy or an alternative plan is selected under expecting future environment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 이강인, 강인순, ‘다구찌 방법을 이용한 망목특성의 선호설비 선택’, 대한설비관리학회지, 제3권, 제2호, 1998, pp.19-29
  2. 조성구, 이강인, ‘퍼지 Choquet적분을 이용한 다속성 의사결정문제의 최적 선호대안 결정’, 대한산업공학회지, 제23권, 제4호, 1997, pp.635-643
  3. 김성희, 의사결정론, 영지문화사, 2004. pp11-13, pp351-365
  4. 정지안, 조성구, (1998), Bootstrapping을 이용한 다속성 평가에서의 가중치 도출방법간의 비교, 대한산업관학회 ’98추계 학술대회 논문집, pp.831-835
  5. 정지안, (1999), ‘다기준 의사결정의 가중치도출방법 선정을 위한 평가기준과 절의 개발’, pp10-19, pp45-49, pp120-122
  6. 이강인, 선호종속을 허용하는 다속성 의사결정 문제의 대화형 접근방법의 개발, 동국대학교 대학원 산업공학과, 박사학위논문, 1996
  7. Chankong, V., Haimes, Y. Y., Thadathil, J., and Zionts, S., 'Multiple Criteria Optimization ; A State of the Art Review', in Chankong, V., Y. Y. Haimes(eds.), Decision Making with Multiple Objectives, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 242, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984, pp.36-90
  8. Edwords, W., and Barron, F. H., 'SMARTS and SMARTER ; Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proesses, Vol.60(1994), pp.306-325
  9. Evans, G. W., 'An Overview of Techniques for Solving Multiobjective Mathematical Programs', Management Science, Vol.30, No.11(1984), pp.1268-1282 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1268
  10. Koksalan, M. M., Karwan, M. H., and Zionts, S., 'An Improved Method for Solving Multiple Criteria Problems Involving Discrete Alternatives', IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-14(1984), pp.24-34 https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1984.6313266
  11. Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H., Salmin- en, P., and Wallenius, J., 'Further Developments and Tests of a alternative Algorithm for Multiple Criteria Decision Making', Operations Research, Vol.41, No.6(1993), pp.1033-1045 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.41.6.1033
  12. Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J., and Zionts, S., 'Solving the Discrete Multiple Criteria Problem using Convex Cones', Management Science, Vol.30, No.11(1984), pp.1336-1345 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1336
  13. Larichev, O, I., and Moshkovich, H. M., 'ZAPROS ; A Method and System for Ordering Multiattribute Alternatives', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.60(1995), pp.503-521
  14. Stewart, T. J., 'Pruning of Decision Alternatives in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Based on the UTA Method for Estimating Utilities', European Journal of Operations Research, Vol.28(1987), pp.77-88
  15. Yang, J. Bo., and Sen, P., 'A General Multi-Level Evaluation Process for Hybrid MADM with Uncertainty', IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Gybernetics, Vol.24, No.10(1994), pp.1458-1472 https://doi.org/10.1109/21.310529
  16. Yu, P. L., 'A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems', Management Science, Vol.19, No.8(1973), pp.936-946 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.19.8.936
  17. Zeleny, M., Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1982
  18. Zimmermann, H. J., Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1987
  19. Ashton, R. H., (1980), Sensitivity of Multiattribute Decision Models to Alternative Specifications of Weighting Parameters, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 8, No.3, pp.341-359
  20. Bana e Costa, C. A., (Eds.), (1990), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, New York
  21. Barron, F. H., and Barrett, B. E., (1996), Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights, Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp.1515-1523
  22. Barron, H., and Schumit, C. P., (1988), Sensitivity Analysis of Additive Multiattribute Value Models, Operations Research, Vol. 36, No.1, pp.122-127
  23. Borcherding, K., Eppel, T., and Von Winterfeldt, D., (1991), Comparison of Weighting Judgements in Multiattribute Utility Measurement. Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 12, pp.1603-1619
  24. Brans, J. P., and Vincke, Ph., (1985), A Preference Ranking Organization Method (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making), Management Science, Vol. 31, No.6, pp.647-656
  25. Canada, J. R., and Sullivan, W. G., (1989), Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, Prentice Hall, NJ.
  26. Choo, E. U., and Wedley, W. C., (1985), Optimal Criterion Weights in Repetitive Multicriteria Decision-Making, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 36, No. 11, pp.983-992
  27. Davey A., and Olson, D., (1998), Multiple Criteria Decision Making Models in Group Decision Support, Group Decision and Negotiation, 7, pp.55-75
  28. Diakoulaki, D., and Kounmoutsos, N., (1991), Cardinal Ranking of Alternative Actions : Extension of the PROMETHEE Method, European Journal of Operational Research, 54, pp.337-347