구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제20권1호
  • /
  • Pages.43-50
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지

유지형태에 따른 치과 인상용 트레이의 유지력에 관한 연구

Retentive Force of Dental Impression Tray According to Retention form

  • 최민호 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신동국 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김민정 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 오상천 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 동진근 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Choi, Min-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Kuk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Jeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Chun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Dong, Jin-Keun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 발행 : 2004.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was performed to measure the retentive force of dental impression tray according to retention form. The 9 resin beams($30{\times}60{\times}2.5mm$) were made of visible light-curing tray resin according to the surface texture, the size of hole and the number of rim. The resin block was fabricated in width 50mm, length 30mm, heght 40mm to maintain an even hydrocolloid impression material. The retentive force between the resin beam and hydrocolloid impression material was measured by Universal Testing Machine(Zwick Z020, Zwick Co., Germany). The results obtained in this study were as follows : 1. The retentive force of the resin beam with bilateral 4 rims, 2mm holes(9group) was highest(9.18kg), and the polishing resin beam(2group) was worst(4.85kg). 2. There was no significant difference between the polished the resin beam(2group) and the contrast resin beam(1group). 3. The retentive force of the rimmed resin beam was higher than the perforated resin beam. 4. The retentive force of the 2mm perforated resin beam(4group) was higher than the 3mm perforated resin beam(3group). 5. As increasing the number of rim increased the retentive force.

키워드