Korean Journal of Poultry Science (한국가금학회지)

The Korean Society of Poultry Science (한국가금학회)
권호 표지

Effects of Applyng Two Different Chemical Additives to the Litter on Broiler Performance and the Carbon Dioxide Gas Production in Poultry Houses

깔짚에 두 가지의 다른 화학제제를 첨가하였을 때 육계의 생산성과 계사내의 이산화탄소 가스 발생에 미치는 영향

  • 최인학 (대구대학교 자연자원대학 가축사료영양학 연구실) ;
  • 남기홍 (대구대학교 자연자원대학 가축사료영양학 연구실)
  • Published : 2004.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of applying two different additives to the litter on broiler performance and the carbon dioxide gas production in poultry cages. In two different experiments, the carbon dioxide gas production in poultry litter used for 42 days was measured. The chemical additives were applied to the litter at a rate of 200 g aluminum chloride(A1Cl$_3$ㆍ6$H_2O$) or 200 g aluminum sulfate [Al$_2$(SO$_4$)$_3$ㆍ14$H_2O$, Alum] + 50 g carbon carbonate per kg litter. There was no effect on broiler performance by the litter additives, but the values of carbon dioxide gas produced from broiler litters which were treated with chemical additives were significantly lower(P < 0.05 and 0.01) than that of the control. This study showed that carbon dioxide gas production can be reduced by chemically treating the litter with A1Cl$_3$ or Alum + CaCO$_3$.

본 연구는 두 가지 화학제제(A1Cl$_3$, Alum+CaCO$_3$)를 깔짚에 첨가하였을 때 육계생산성과 계사내 이산화탄소($CO_2$)발생에 어떠한 영향을 주는지 알아보기 위해서 수행하였다. 2가지 실험은 42일 동안 이용한 깔짚에서 발생되는 이산화탄소($CO_2$) 가스 함량을 측정하였다. 깔짚 kg 당의 화학제제는 200 g A1Cl$_3$ㆍ6$H_2O$, 200g $Al_2$(SO$_4$)$_3$ㆍ14$H_2O$＋50g CaCO$_3$의 비율로 첨가하였다. 시험 결과 육계생산성은 각 대조구와 처리구간에 차이가 없었지만, 화학제제를 처리한 육계 깔짚에서 생성된 이산화탄소($CO_2$) 발생량은 대조구보다 낮았다(P < 0.05와 0.01). 본 연구는 화학제제를 처리한 구(A1Cl$_3$, Alum+CaCO$_3$)가 화학제제를 처리하지 않은 구(대조구)보다 이산화탄소($CO_2$) 발생량이 현저하게 감소되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Al Homidan A, Robertson JF, Petchey AM 2003 The effect of ammonia and dust oncentrations on broiler performance. Poultry Sci 59:340-349
  2. Anderson DP, Beard CW, Hanson RP 1964 The adverse effects of ammonia on chickens including resistance to infection with Newcastle Disease virus. Avian Dis 8:369-379
  3. Bruce JM 1981 Ventilation and temperature control criteria for pigs. In: Clark JA (Ed.) Environmental Aspects of Housing for Animal Production. Butterworths London pp. 197-216
  4. Busse FW 1993 Comparison measurements of the house climate in swine stables with and without respiratory diseases or cannibalism. In: Livestock Environment(Collins E; Boon C eds), pp 904-908. Fourth International Symposium, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. ASAE St Joseph MI
  5. Carlile FS 1984 Ammonia in poultry houses: A literature review. World's Poulty Sci J 40:99-113
  6. CIGR 1992 Climatization of animal houses. Commission Internationale du Genie Rurale. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, State University of Gent Gent Belgium
  7. Curtis SE 1993 Environmental Management in Animal Agriculture. Iowa State University Press Ames
  8. de Willigen P, Ehelrt PAL 1991 Nitrogen and phosphorus balance and losses from soil in the Netherlands, In:Nitrogen and phosphorus balance and losses from soil in the Netherlands, L. D Currie and P Loganathan, (eds), Fertilizer and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Occasional Report No. 9: Palmerston North pp.7-27
  9. Donham KJ, Knapp LW, Monson R, Gustafan K 1982 Acute toxic exposure to gases from manure. Journal of Occupational Medicine 24:142-145
  10. Edwards DR, Daniel TC 1992 Environmental Impacts of On-Farm Poultry Waste Disposal. Bioresource Technology 41:9-33
  11. Feigin A, Savig B 1974 Cumulative effects of manures applied with and without fertilizers, on nutrient availability in the soil and on yields of cops under irrigation. A. Effects of manures and fertilizers on a pale brown loessial soil and on a series of crops on the permanent plots in the Negev. Hassades 54:1335-1384
  12. Gross P, Westrick ML, McNerney JM 1959 The pulmonary response to a proteinaceous dust. AMA Arch Ind Health 20:477-488
  13. Grub W, Rollo CA, Howes JR 1965 Dust problems in poultry environments. Transactions of the American Society of Agriculture Engineers pp.338-339, 352
  14. Harry EG 1978 Air pollution in farm buildings and methods of control: A review. Avian Pathology 7:441-454
  15. Hartung J, Phillips VR 1994 Control of gaseous emissions from livestock buildings and manure stores. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 57(3):173-189
  16. Heber AJ, Duggirala RK, Ni JQ, Spence ML, Haymore BL, Adamchuk VI, Bundy DS, Sutton AL, Kelly DT, Keener KM 1997 Manure treatment to reduce gas emissions from large swine houses. In: International Symposium on Ammonia and Odour Control from Animal Production Facilities (Voermans JAM; Monteny GS eds), pp 44-458. Vinkeloord, The Netherlands. NVTL, PO-Box 83, 5240 AB Rosmalen The Netherlands
  17. Hobbs PJ, Misselbrook TH, Comby TR 1999 production and emission of odours and gases from ageing pig waste. J Agri Engng Res 72:291-298 https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0372
  18. Johnston NL, Quarles CL, Faberberg DJ, Caveny DD 1981 Evaluation of yucca saponin on broiler performance and ammonia suppression. Poultry Sci 60:2289-2292
  19. Lebeda DL, Day DL, Havakawa I 1964 Air pollutants in swine buildings with fluid waste handling. ASAE paper 64-94 St Joseph Mich
  20. MAFF 1991 Code of good agricultural practice for the protection of water. London:HMSO, London pp.79
  21. Mathers AC, Stewart BA 1974 Corn silage yield and soil chemical properties as affected by cattle-feedlot manure. J Environ Qual 3:143-147
  22. Moore Jr PA 1995 Reducing ammonia volatilization from poultry litter with aluminum sulfate. In: Proceeding of the Meeting Arkansas Nutrition Conference, Clarion Inn Fayetteville Ar USA pp:104-119
  23. Moore Jr PA, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Miller DM 1995 Effects of chemical amendments on reduce ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. J Environ Qual 24:293-300
  24. Moore Jr PA, Daniel TC, Edwards DR 2000 Reducing phosphorus runoff and inhibiting ammonia losses from poultry manure with aluminum sulfate. J Environ Qual 29:37-49
  25. Muehling AJ 1970 Gases and odors stored swine wastes. Journal of Animal Science 30:526-530
  26. Noren O, Sren-Uno S, Gustaf A 1967 Recent experiences from JTI's studies in the manure gas problem. Tr. Alfa-Laval Ab Tumba. Circ. No. 20, Swedish Inst Agr Engin (JTI) Ultuna Upsala 7 Sweden
  27. O'Connor JM, Mcquitty JM, Clark PC 1987 Air quality and contaminant loads in three commercial broiler breeder barns. Canadian Agriculture Engineers: pp.273-276
  28. O'Neill DH, Phillips VR 1992 A review of the control odour nuisance from livestock buildings: Part 3. Properties of the odorous substances which have been identified in livestock wastes or in the air around them. J Agri ENG Res 53:23-50
  29. Reece FN, Bates BJ, Lott BD 1979 Ammonia control in broiler houses. Poultry Sci 58:754-755
  30. Rouf MA, Lomprey, Jr RF 1968 Degradation of uric acid by certain aerobic bacteria. J Bacteriol 96:617-622
  31. Siegal RS, Hafez AAR, Azevebo J, Stout PR 1975 Management procedurs for effective fertilization with poultry manure. Compost Sci 16:5-9
  32. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG 1969 Statistical Methods, 6th Ed., Iowa State University Press Ames IA USA
  33. Webster AJ 1990 Housing on respiratory disease in farm animals. Outlook on Agriculture 19:31-35
  34. Williams PEV 1995 Animal production and European pollution problems. Anim Feed Sci Technol 32:106-115
  35. Yoder WL, Van Wicklen GL 1988 Respirable aerosol generation by broiler chickens. Transactions of the American Society of Agriculture Engineers 31:1510-1517
  36. Zhu J, Riskowski GL, Torremorell M 1999 Volatile fatty acid as odor indicators in swine manure. Transactions of the ASAE 42(1):175-182