DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Forest Vegetation Effect on Water Balance in a Watershed

산림식생에 따른 유역 물수지 영향 평가

  • 김철겸 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구부) ;
  • 김남원 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구부)
  • Published : 2004.09.01

Abstract

In this study, to evaluate the effect of forest vegetation on the long-term water balance in a watershed, semi-distributed and physically based parameter model, SWAT was applied to the Bocheong watershed, and the variation of hydrological components such as evapotranspiration, surface flow, lateral flow, base flow, and total runoff was investigated with coniferous and deciduous forests, respectively. First, SWAT model was modified to simulate the actual plant growth pattern of coniferous trees which have the uniform value of leaf area index all the seasons of the year. The modified model was applied to the watershed that is assumed to have only one land cover in the whole watershed, and the variation of the water balance components was investigated for each land cover. It was found that coniferous forest affected the increase in evapotranspiration and decrease in runoff more than deciduous forest. However, the age and the density of stand, the location, and soil characteristics and meteorological conditions including the tree species should be also considered to examine the effect more quantitatively and to reduce the uncertainties in simulated output from the hydrological model.

본 연구에서는 산림식생에 따른 장기적인 측면에서의 유역 물수지 영향을 살펴보기 위하여 보청천 유역을 대상유역으로 선정하고, 준분포형 매개변수 모형인 SWAT 모형을 적용하여, 침엽수와 활엽수에 따른 증발산, 지표유출, 중간유출, 기저유출, 총 유출의 차이를 검토하였다. 먼저 SWAT 모형내 식생 생장 알고리즘을 수정하여 연중 일정한 엽면적지수를 갖는 국내 침엽수림의 생장 특성을 반영할 수 있도록 하였으며, 대상유역을 하나의 토지피복을 갖는 가상의 유역으로 설정한 후, 수정된 SWAT 모형을 적용하여 각 물수지 요소 변화를 모의한 결과, 침엽수가 활엽수에 비해 증발산 증가 및 유출 감소에 더 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나, 보다 정량적인 규명과 유출모형의 불확실성을 보완하기 위해서는 수종 외에 수령, 식재밀도, 식재위치, 토양특성자료 등 다양한 조건이 충분히 고려되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설부 (1990), 1999년도 수자원관리기법개발연구조사 보고서, pp. 245
  2. 김경하, 정용호, 정창기 (2003). '전나무림에서 간벌과 가지치기가 임내우 및 차단손실량에 미치는 영향.' 한국임학회지, 제92권, 제3호, pp. 276-283
  3. 김경하, 정용호, 정창기, 전재홍, 유재윤 (2003) '산림 소유역에서 장기 수문자료를 이용하여 분석한 임상이 첨두유출량에 미치는 영향.' 한국임학회지, 제 92권, 제5호, pp. 462-469
  4. 김승 (1997). 월유출모형의 개발, 건기연 97-125, 한국건설기술연구원
  5. 김재수 (1987). '산림이 홍수량에 미치는 영향과 소유역내 증발산량 추정.' 임업연구원연구보고, 제35호, pp. 69-78
  6. Allen, R G, M E. Jensen, J. L. Wright, and Burman R D. (1989). 'Operational estimates of evapo-transpiration.' Agron J., No. 81, pp. 650-662
  7. Anderson, H. W., Hoover, M. D., and Reinhart, K G. (1976). Forest and Water: Effects of forest management on floods, sedimentation and water supply. USDA Forest Service, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW 18, p. 115
  8. Bosch, J. M. and Hewlett, J. D. (1982). 'A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapo-transpiration.' Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 55, pp. 3-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2
  9. Eckhardt, K., Breuer, L., and Frede, H.-G. (2003). 'Parameter uncertainty and the significance of simulated land use change effects.' Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 273, pp. 164-176 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00395-5
  10. Evan R C. Reynolds and Frank B. Thompson (1988). Forest, climate, and hydrology : Regional impacts. The United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan
  11. Green, W. H. and Ampt G. A. (1911). 'Studies on soil physics, 1. The flow of air and water through soils.' Journal of Agricultural Sciences, No. 4, pp. 11-24
  12. Hargreaves, G H and Samani Z. A (1985). 'Reference crop evapotranspiraton from temperature.' Applied Engineering in Agriculture, No. 1, pp. 96-99
  13. Linsley, R. K (1982). Hydrology for engineers. 3rd ed., McGraw Hill Ltd.
  14. Maidment, D. R (1992). Handbook of hydrology. McGraw Hill Ltd., pp. 26.2-26.3
  15. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G, Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R (2001). Soil and Water Assessment Tool : the theoretical documentation (version 2000). U. S. Agricultural Research Service
  16. Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor R J. (1972). 'On the assessment of surface heat flux and evapo-transpiration using large-scale parameters.' Mon Weather. Rev., No. 100, pp. 81-92 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2
  17. Watershed Science Centre (2000). Water budget analysis on a watershed basis. Trent University, Canada

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Natural Flow Estimates for the Han River Basin Using TANK and SWAT Models vol.45, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2012.45.3.301
  2. Applicability Analysis of Water Provisioning Services Quantification Models of Forest Ecosystem vol.17, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.4.1