Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology

The Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology (환경독성보건학회)
권호 표지

Selection of Priority Areas Based on Human and Economic Risk from Exposure to Fine Particles in Seoul

서울 대기 중 미세 먼지 노출로 인한 위해도에 근거한 우선 관리 지역 선정 -이론적 사망 위해도 및 손실비용을 근거로-

  • 김예신 (연세대학교 환경공해연구소) ;
  • 이용진 (연세대학교 환경공해연구소) ;
  • 신동천 (연세대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2004.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is important to select a risk based priority area for environmental policy formation and decision-making. We estimated the health risks and associated damage costs from exposure to fine particles and assigned priority areas for twenty -five districts in Seoul. In order to estimate the theoretical mortality incidence of the health risk, baseline risks were estimated from mortality rates in two low level areas of fine particles, Seocho Gu and Cheju city To estimate the damage cost from the risk estimates, we investigated and estimated the willingness to pay (WTP) for specific risk reduction. We assumed two different locations as the reference area, Cheju city as Scenario I and Seocho gu as Scenario II. From the results, the five districts, Kwangjin, Chungnang, Kangbuk, Nowon, and Kangnam, ranked high in the categories of both health risk and economic risk. Damage costs were over twenty billion won in each of these districts. As there are uncertainties in these results, the parameter values such as PM$_{2.5}$ level, dose -response slope factor, baseline risk, exposure population and WTP should be continuously validated and refined.d.

Keywords

References

  1. 권호장, 조수헌, 장재연, 임종한, 하은희, 하미나. 황사의 건강 위해성 평가연구. 2002; 34-38pp. 환경부
  2. 김병화, 김동술. 수원지역 $PM_2.5$와$PM_10$의 화학적 특성. 한국대기환경학회 춘계학술대회 논문집. 1999; 21-22
  3. 김예신, 임영욱, 남정모 장재연, 이동수, 신동천. 환경 문제의 우선 순위 도출을 위한 비교 위해도 분석에 관한 연구. 한국환경독성학회지. 2002; 17(4): 285-298
  4. 김예신, 박화성, 이용진, 임영욱, 신동천.서울 지역에서 인체 위해도에 입각한 대기오염물질의 관리 우선 순위선정에 관한 연구. 한국대기환경학회지. 2003; 19(2).205-216
  5. 김예신, 이용진, 박화성, 남정모, 김진흠, 신동천. 환경 오염으로 인한 위해도 감소에 대한 지불의사금액 추정에 관한 연구. 한국환경독성학회지. 2003; 18(1): 1-13
  6. 김예신, 이용진, 박화성, 신동천.환경 오염으로 인한 인체위해도에 입각한 사망 손실 비용에 관한 연구. 대한예방의학회지. 2003; 36(3): 230-238
  7. 김창환, 이윤신, 조정구, 최금찬 부산지역 $PM_25$와 $PM_10$입자의 비교에 관한 연구. 한국대기환경학회 춘계학술대회 논문집. 1999; 270-271pp
  8. 최민규, 여현구, 임종억, 조기철, 김희강 강화에서의 $PM_2.5$특성 . 한국대기환경학회지 .2000; 16(6): 573-583
  9. 통계청 인구동태통계 연보 '01. 2002
  10. 환경부 대기환경 연보 '99. 2000
  11. 환경부 대기환경연보 '00. 2001
  12. 환경부 대기환경연보 '01. 2002
  13. Brunekreef B. Air pollution and Life expectancy: Is there a relation? Occup Environ Med 1997; 54: 781-784 https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.54.11.781
  14. Brimblecombe P. Urban ari pollution. In: The Urban Atmo-eds). Vol. 1, Air Pollution Rebiews. Imperial College press, London, UK. 2001
  15. Dockery DW and Pope CA III. Acute respiratory effects of paniculate air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994, 15: 107-132 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.000543
  16. Dockery DW, Pope CA III, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG Jr and Speizer FE. An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities, New Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 1753-1759 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312093292401
  17. European Commission. Ambient air pollution by paniculate matter, Position Paper. Final version. 1997
  18. Krewski D, Burnett RT, Goldberg MS, Hoover K, Siemia-tycki J, Jerrett M and Abrahamowicz M. White WH Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities study and the Amer-ican Cancer Society study of paniculate air pollutior. and mortality. A special report of the Institute's Particle Epidemiology Reanalysis Project, Cambridge, MA: Health Effects Institute. 2000
  19. Kunzli N, Kaiser R, Medina S, Studnicka M and Chanel O.Filliger P Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic related air pollution: a European assessment. Lancet 2000; 356: 795-801 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02653-2
  20. Levy JI, Hammitt JK and Spengler JD. Estimating the mor-tality impacts of particulate matter: What can be learned from between-study variability? Environ Health Pers-pect. 2000; 108(2): 109-117 https://doi.org/10.2307/3454508
  21. Pope CA III, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K and Thurston GD. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine paniculate air pollution. JAMA 2002; 287: 1132-1141 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.9.1132
  22. Pope CA III, Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Dockery DW, Evans JS, Speizer FE and Huath CW. Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a Prospective study of US adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995; 151: 669-674 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/151.3_Pt_1.669
  23. Schwartz J. What are people dying of on high air pollution days? Environ Res. 1994; 64: 26-35 https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1994.1004
  24. US Environmental Protection Agency. Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter. National Center for Environmen-tal Assessment PTP Reports EPA/600/P- 95/001a F-cF.3v. US EPA, Research Triangle Park NC. Also avai-lable as PB96-168224 from NTIS, Springfield VA. 1996
  25. US Environmental Protection Agency. The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act; 1990 to 2010. EPA 410-R-99-001. US EPA Office of Air and Radiation, Washington DC. 1999
  26. US Environmental Protection Agency. Guideline for prepar-ing economic analysis. Office of the Administrator, September, EPA-240-R-00-003. 2000
  27. US Environmental Protection Agency. Air quality criteria for particulate matter. EPA 600/P-99/002bB. US EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington DC. 2001