Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제29권5호
  • /
  • Pages.423-429
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

All-in-one adhesive의 다층적용이 미세인장결합강도에 미치는 영향

THE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE APPLICATION ON MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF ALL-IN-ONE DENTIN ADHESIVE SYSTEMS

  • 손성애 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Son, Sung-Ae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of multiple application of all-in-one dentin adhesive system on microtensile bond strength using confocal laser scanning microscope and microtensile bond strength test. Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were prepared using low-speed diamond saw. In group I, Scotchbond Multipurpose (SM) was applied by manufacturer's recommendation. In group II, after Adper Prompt L-Pop was applied for 15s and light cured for 10s. the second coat was re-applied and light-cured. In group III, after light-curing the second layer. the third coat was re-applied and light-cured. Specimens bonded with a resin-composite were sectioned into resin-dentin stick for measuring the adhesive layer thickness by confocal laser scanning microscope and evaluating micro-tensile bond strength. The adhesive layers of three-step dentin adhesive system. 3 coats of Adper Prompt L-Pop had significantly thicker than SM. 2 coats of Adper Prompt L-Pop (p < 0.05). However. there was no significant differences in bond strengths between SM and 3 coats of Adper Prompt L-Pop (p > 0.05). And SM. 3 coats of Adper Prompt L-Pop had significantly higher than 2 coats of Adper Prompt L-Pop in bond strengths (p < 0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bounocore M. A Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34:849-853, 1955 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  2. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Investig 3:11-17, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050072
  3. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Micromorphological spectrum of acid-conditioned dentin following the application of a water-based adhesive. Dent Mater 14:329-338, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00046-3
  4. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 27:619-625, 1996
  5. Nakabayashi N. Resin reinforced dentin due to infiltration of monomers into the dentin adhesive interface. J Jpn Dent Mat Devices 1:78-81, 1982
  6. Perdigao J, Lopes M. Dentin bonding-questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1:191-209, 1999
  7. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 5:127-129, 1992
  8. Kanca J 3rd. Resin bonding to wet substrate. 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 23:39-41, 1992
  9. Kanca J 3rd. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5:213-215, 1992
  10. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 16:180-187, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00007-5
  11. Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 7:144-148, 1994
  12. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30:83-90, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7
  13. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25:324-330, 2000
  14. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. 'No-bottle' vs 'multi-bottle' dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373-380, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1
  15. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 31:353-358, 2000
  16. Blunck U, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of compomer Class V restorations in vitro. J Adhes Dent 1:143-151, 1999
  17. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Oberschachtsiek H, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaption after NaOCI pre-treatment. Oper Dent 25:40-45, 2000
  18. Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Waddell SL. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent 22:194-1999, 1997
  19. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficieiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 12:277-282, 1999
  20. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-stop, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 29:55-61, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00049-X
  21. Platt JA, Almeida J, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Rhodes B, Moore BK. The effect of double adhesive application on the shear bond strength to dentin of compomers using three one-bottle adhesive systems. Oper Dent 26:313-317, 2001
  22. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 79:812-817, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790030501
  23. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 72:490-494, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720020401
  24. Duke ES. Adhesion and its application with restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 37:329-340, 1993
  25. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66:1636-1639, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  26. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Davidson CL. Stiffness increase during the setting of dental composite resins. J Dent Res 66:1713-1716, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660120301
  27. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63: 1396-1399, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101
  28. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301
  29. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microten-sile bond strength. Oper Dent 26(1):97-104, 2001
  30. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent 1:57-67, 1999
  31. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434-1442, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720101401
  32. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64:658-664, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90291-J
  33. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS. The effect of air thinning on dentin adhesive bond strength. Oper Dent 20:133-137, 1995
  34. Ai H, Nagai M. Effect of the adhesive layer thickness on the fracture toughness of dental adhesive resins Dent Mater J 19:153-163, 2000 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.19.153
  35. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microten-sile bond strength. Oper Dent 26:97-104, 2001
  36. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25:324-330, 2000
  37. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 27:619-625, 1996
  38. Oysaed H, Ruyter IE, Sjovik Kleven IJ. Release of formaldehyde from dental composites. J Dent Res 67:1289-1294, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670100901
  39. Ruyter IE. Unpolymerized surface layers on sealants. Acta Odontol Scand 39:27-32, 1981 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358109162255
  40. Ban S, Hasegawa J. Heat of polymerization of dimethacrylate monomers investigated by isothermal DSC measurement. Dent Mater 3:85-92, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80011-8
  41. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 69:1652-1658, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100501
  42. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T, Vanherle G. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 9:167-173, 1996
  43. Causton BE, Sefton J, Some bonding characteristics of a HEMA/maleic acid adhesion promoter. Br Dent J 167:308-311, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807020

피인용 문헌

  1. Influence of application methods of one-step self-etching adhesives on microtensile bond strength vol.36, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.203