Comparison of the rheologies of laterite and goethite suspensions

  • James, David F. (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto) ;
  • Blakey, Brian C. (Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto)
  • Published : 2004.09.01

Abstract

Comparisons in shear behaviour are made between aqueous suspensions of a laterite ore and aqueous suspensions of pure goethite ($\alpha$-FeOOH), following prior papers in which the rheologies of the two mineral suspensions were characterized individually. Drawing comparisons is appropriate because the ore sample was about 65% goethite and it was originally thought that the pure goethite might serve as a model of the more complex laterite. Viscosity measurements of the two suspensions show that, at the same solids fraction, the goethite suspensions were more viscous by an order of magnitude, even though the goethite particles had much smaller aspect ratios. Similarly, yield stresses for the goethite suspensions were at least an order of magnitude higher. The most significant difference was in transient behaviour. Time-dependent effects were investigated by subjecting a fluid to a step change or a ramp sequence in shear rate, and measuring the resulting shear stress over time. In most cases, transient behaviour could not be detected in the goethite suspensions, whereas stresses in the laterite suspensions relaxed over periods of order 10 seconds. The disparate results indicate that a goethite suspension is a poor model of a laterite slurry.

Keywords

References

  1. Avotins, P.V, S.S. Ahlschlager and G.R. Wicker, 1979, The Rheology and Handling of Laterite Slurries, in Proc. International Laterite Symposium, Evans, D.J.I, R.S. Shoemaker and H. Veltman, eds., AIME, New Orleans, LA
  2. Avramidis, K.S. and R.M. Turian, 1991, Yield Stress of Laterite Suspensions, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 143, 54-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(91)90436-C
  3. Bhattacharya, I.N., D. Panda and P. Bandopadhyay, 1998, Rheological Behaviour of Nickel Laterite Suspensions, Int. J. Miner. Process. 53, 251-263 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(98)00003-9
  4. Blakey, B.C., 2002, The Viscous Behaviour of Aqueous Goethite-Containing Suspensions, PhD Thesis, University of Toronto
  5. Blakey, B.C. and D.F. James, 2003A, Characterizing the Rheology of Laterite Suspensions, Int. J. Miner. Process. 70, 23-39 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(02)00147-3
  6. Blakey, B.C. and D.F. James, 2003B, The Viscous Behaviour and Structure of Aqueous Suspensions of Goethite, Colloids Surf. A. 231, 19-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2003.08.019
  7. Cerpa, A., M.T. Garcia-Gonzalez, P. Tartaj, J. Requena, L.R. Garcell and C.J. Serna, 1996, Rheological Properties of Concentrated Lateritic Suspensions, Progr. CoIloid. PoIym. Sci. 100, 266-270 https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0115791
  8. Chang, J.C., F.F. Lange and D.S. Pearson, 1994, Viscosity and Yield Stress of Alumina Slurries Containing Large Concentrations of Electrolyte, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 19-26 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06952.x
  9. Green, M.D. and D.V. Boger, 1997, Yielding of Suspensions in Compression, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 4984-4992 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie970141i
  10. Kanai, H. and T. Amari, 1986, Negative Thixotropy in Ferric-Oxide Suspensions, RheoIoey Acta 34, 303-310
  11. Krause, E., B.C. Blakey and V.G. Papangelakis, 1998, 'Pressure Leaching of Nickeliferous Laterite Ores', in ALTA 1998: Nickel/Cobalt Pressure Leaching and Hydrometallurgy Forum, ALTA Metallurgical Services, Melbourne, Australia
  12. Lataillade, J-L., J. Pouyet and C. Signoret, 1980, Ad$\'e$quation dun dispositif de torsion dynamique par barres de Hopkinson pour l$\'e$tude rh$\'e$ologique en cisaillement quasi uniform des polym$\`e$res solides a grande vitesse de glissement; r$\'e$sultats pr$\'e$liminaires, C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris 290, S$\'e$rie B, 219-222
  13. Mezei, A., C.J. Ferron and M. Ashbury, 1999, Practical Aspects of Rheological Studies for the Mineral and Process Slurhes, in Rheology in the Mineral and Energy Industries II, Hawaii
  14. Rodriguez Nino, M.R., P.J. Wilde, D.C. Clark and J.M. Rodriguez Patino, 1996, Surface Rheological Properties of Monostearin and Monoolein Films Spread on the Air-Aqueous Phase Interface, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 4449-4456 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie960333y
  15. Turian, R.M., T.W. Ma, F.L.G. Hsu and D.J. Sung, 1997, Characterization, Settling, and Rheology of Concentrated Fine Particulate Mineral Slurries, Powder Tech. 93, 219-233 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(97)03274-9
  16. Weiss, J. and D. J. McClements, 2000, Influence of Ostwald Ripening on Rheology of Oil-in-Water Emulsions Containing Electrostatically Stabilized Droplets, Langmuir 16, 2145-2150 https://doi.org/10.1021/la9909392