A Comparison Study of Single with Double Intrauterine Insemination with Mild Ovarian Hyperstimulation for Infertility Patients

불임 환자의 치료에서 Mild Ovarian Hyperstimulation을 이용한 Single IUI와 Double IUI의 비교

  • Son, Young-Soo (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheong-Ju St. Marys' Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung-Ang University)
  • 손영수 (청주 성모병원 산부인과) ;
  • 이상훈 (중앙대학교 의과대학 산부인과학교실)
  • Published : 2004.09.30

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of double intrauterine insemination with single intrauterine insemination in GnRH antagonist combined ovarian hyperstimulation (Mild ovarian hyperstimulation) Materials and Methods: From Jan. 2001 to Jul. 2004, a retrospective clinical analysis was done of a total of 295 cycles in 170 patients who underwent ovarian hyperstimulation for ART (assisted reproductive technique). Subjects were divided into three groups; only clomiphene citrate ovarian hyperstimulation (n=55, 95cycles), GnRH antagonist combined ovarian hyperstimulation (soft ovarian hyperstimulation) (n=66 99cycles), and GnRH agonist combined ovarian hyperstimulation (short protocol) (n=49, 101cycles) Each group were randomly devided into two subgroups. One group underwent single IUI and the other group underwent double IUI. Results: GnRH antagonist group and GnRH agonist group had similar pregnancy rate. In GnRH antagonist Group, pregnancy rate was 36.1% in single IUI subgroup and was 36.6% in double IUI subgroup. These finding were not statistically significant. And Pregnancy rate was 20.8% in single IUI subgroup and was 19.3% in double IUI subgroup in single clomiphene citrate group, and 36.3% in single IUI subgroup and was 33.3% in double IUI subgroup in GnRH agonist group. These finding were not statistically significant, too. Conclusion: Pregnancy rate of GnRH antagonist was high and complication rate such as OHSS and multiple pregnancy was lower. In GnRH antagonist group, to compare with single IUI and double IUI, the result do not statistically differ. So GnRH antagonist single injection with single IUI was relatively comparable ART in infertiliry patient.

Keywords

References

  1. Chaffkin LM, Nulsen JC, Lucian AA, Metzger DA. A comparrative analysis of the cycle fecundity rates associated with combine human menopausal gona- dotropine and intrauterine insermination versus either HMG or intrauterine insermination alone. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 252-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54111-9
  2. Diamond MP, Hill GA, Webster BW, Herbert CM, Rogers BJ, Osteen KG, et al. Comparison of human menopausal gonadotropin, clomiphen citrate, and combined human menopausal gonadotropin-clomi- phen citrate stimulation protocols for in vitro fer- tilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1108-12
  3. Diedrich K, Diedrich C, Santos E, Zoll C, Al-Han- sani S, Reissmann T, et al. Suppression of the endo- genous luteinizing hormonesurge by the gonado- tropin-release hormone agonist cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 788-91
  4. Porter RN, Smith W, Craft IL, Abdulwahid NA, Jacobs HS. Induction of ovulation for in-vitro fer- tilisation using buserelin and gonadotropins. Lancet 1984; ii: 1284-5
  5. Diedrich K, Diedrich C, Santos E. Suppression of the endogeneous luteinizing hormon surge by the gonadotropin-releasing hormon antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation. Hum Report 1994; 9: 788-91 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138597
  6. Olivennes F, Alvarez S, Fanchin R, Bouchard P, Salat-Baroux J, Frydman R. Plasmatic and follicular fluid levels of a new GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) used in IVF patients with a simple single admini- stration protocol in the late follicular phase in stimu- lated and spontaneous cycles. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 47
  7. Ragni G, Maggioni P, Guermandi E, Testa A, Baroni E, Colombo M, et al. Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 619-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00326-X
  8. Random MX, Blotner MB, Bohrer M, Corsan G, Kemmann B. Does increasing frequency of intrau- terine insemination improve pregnancy rate signifi- cantly during superovulation cycles? Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 303-7
  9. Silverberg KM, Johnson JV, Olive DL, burns W, Schenken RS. A prospective, randomized trial com- paring two different intrauterine insemination regi- mens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 357-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54845-6
  10. Saeed Alborzi, S. Motazedian, S. Jannati. Compa- rison of the effectiveness of single IUI versus dou- ble IUI Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 595-9
  11. Lashen H. Investigations for infertility Current Obstetric Gynaecol 2004; 14(4): 269-76
  12. Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Comparison of sperm quality necessary for succe- ssful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 684-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00519-6
  13. Hughes EG, Fedorkow DM, Daya S, Sagle MA, VAn de Koppel P, Collins JA. The routine use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to in vitro fertilization and gameta infrafallopian transfer: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 1992; 58(5): 888-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55430-2
  14. Albano C, Felberbaum R, Smitz J. On behalf of European Cetrorelix study group. Ovarian hypersti- mulation with HMG: result of a prospective rando- mized phase III European study comparing the lute- inizing hormon released hormon (LHRH)-antago- nist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buscrelin. Hum REport 2003; 3: 526-31
  15. Elchalal U, Schenken JG. The pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrom -view and idea. Hum Report 1997; 12:1129-31 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.6.1129
  16. Albano C, Smitz J, Camus M, Riethmüller-Winzen H, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Comparison of different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during controlled ovarian hy- perstimulation. Fertil Steril 1997; 5: 917-22
  17. Michael M, Brian M. Berger. High dose Follicle Sti- mulating Hormone (FSH) and Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HMG) combined with a single dose of Cetrorelix: can it normalize the response of the poor responder? Fertility and Sterility 2003; 80: 191