International Journal of Quality Innovation

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

A Generative Research Methodology for Implementing TQM in Small and Medium-sized Manufacturing Enterprises

  • Lewis, W.G. (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering The University of the West Indies) ;
  • Pun, K.F. (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering The University of the West Indies) ;
  • Lalla, T.R.M. (Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering The University of the West Indies)
  • Published : 2004.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Many researchers and practitioners have acknowledged the need to investigate the relationships amongst various criteria of implementing total quality management (TQM) in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises (SMMEs). There is a need to have practical research methodologies that take cognisance of the peculiarities of SMMEs and impact on their quality management practices in developing countries. This paper presents the theoretical foundation of a proposed Generative Research Methodology and configures the specification of a TQM implementation framework in SMMEs. The methodology combines rigorous research approaches, builds theory based on the dynamics of the environment and the firms' characteristics and incorporates various TQM criteria into the design of the framework. It synchronises inductive and deductive research methods in three phases and uses various means to acquire empirical evidence and examine the dependent and independent variables of TQM implementation. It is anticipated that the methodology could help SMMEs to develop, analyse and evaluate the framework for attaining quality performance goals.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahire, S.L. and Ravichandran, T. (2001), 'An innovation diffsion model of TQM implementation', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 445-464 https://doi.org/10.1109/17.969423
  2. Lakhe, R.R. and Mohanty, R.P. (1994), 'Total quality management: concepts, evolution and acceptabilty in developing economies', International Journal of Quality &Reliability Management, Vol. 11, No. 9, pp. 9-33 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719410074279
  3. Maull, D., Brown, P. and Cliff, R. (2001), 'Organisational culture and quality improvement',International Journal of Operations and Production, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 302-326 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110364614
  4. Sila, I. and Ebrahimpour, M. (2002), 'An investigation of the total quality management survey based research published between 1989 and 2000', International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 902-970 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710210434801
  5. Ho, S. (2002), 'Integrated management through ISO 9001:2000 and TQM', Integrated Management: Proceedings of the $\6^t^h$ International Conference on 1S0 9000 and TQM, pp. 13-18
  6. Leonard, D. and McAdam, R. (2003), 'An evaluative framework for TQM dynamics in organisations', International Journal of Operations Production Management, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 652-677 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310476663
  7. Ahire, S.L., Golhar, D.L., and Waller, M.A., (1996) 'Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs', Decision Science, Vol. 27. No. 1, pp. 23-56 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00842.x
  8. Yusof, M.S. and Aspinwall, E. (2000), 'TQM implementation issues: review and case study', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 634-655 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010321595
  9. Ashok, S. and Santhakumar, A.R. (2002), 'NLP to promote TQM for effective implementation of ISO 9000', Managing Auditing Journal, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 261-265 https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900210429687
  10. Leonard, D., Reid, R. and McAdam, R. (2002), ' A grounded-multi-model framework for TQM dynamics', International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 710-736 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710210429582
  11. Dale, B.G. (1999), Managing Quality, Blackwell, Oxford
  12. Leonard, D. and McAdam, R. (2001), 'Grounded theory methodology and practitioner reflexivity in TQM research', International Journal of Quality and Reliability, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 180-194 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710110377301
  13. Hill, J. and McGowan, P. (1999), 'Small business and enterprise development: questions about research methodology', International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 5-18 https://doi.org/10.1108/13552559910259829
  14. Nachmias, C. and Nachmias, D. (1996), Research Methodology in Social Sciences, Fifth Edition, Edward Amolds, London
  15. Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R.G. and Sakakibara, S. (1994), 'A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument', Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 11, pp. 339-366 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(97)90004-8
  16. Wilson, L. and Durant, R. (1995), 'Evaluating TQM: the case for a theory driven approach (total quality management)', Public Administration Review, Vol. 2, pp. 137-46
  17. Forza, C. and Filippini, R. (1998) 'TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: a causal model', International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 55, pp. 1-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00007-3
  18. Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (1996), Making sense of Management, Sage Publications, London
  19. Yin, R. (1989), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Newbuiy Park, CA
  20. Carson, D. and Coviello, N. (1995), 'Qualitative research issues at the marketing /entrepreneurship interface', Market Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 51-59
  21. Simon, A., Sohal, A. and Brown, A. (1996), 'Generative and case study research in quality management Part 1: theoretical considerations' International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 32-42 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719610108288
  22. Yang, J. and Shi, P. (2002), 'Applying analytic hierarchy process in a firm's overall performance evaluation: a case study in China', International Journal of Business, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 31-46
  23. Crowe, T.J., Noble, S.J. and Machimada, S.J. (1998), 'Multi-attribute analysis of ISO 9000 registration using AHP', International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 205-222 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719810368495
  24. Pun, K..F. and Hui, I.K. (2001), 'An analytical hierarchy process assessment of the ISO 14001 environmental management system', Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 333-345 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005711
  25. Kline, R.B. (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, The Guilford Press, New York, NY
  26. Bozionelos, N. (2003), 'Causal path modeling: what it does and what it does not do', Career Development International, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 5-11 https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430310459469
  27. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (1993), Management Research, Sage Publications, London
  28. Sitter, L., Hertog, J. and Dankbaar, B. (1997), 'From complex organisations with simple jobs to simple jobs to simple organisations with complex jobs', Human Relations, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 497-535
  29. Mo. J.P.T. and Chan, A.M.S. (1997), 'Strategy for the successful implementation of ISO 9000 in small and medium manufacturers', TQM Magazine, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 135-45 https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789710165581
  30. Ghobadian, A. and Gallear, D.N. (1996), 'Total quality management in SMEs', Omega, Vol 24, No. 1, pp. 83-106 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00055-0
  31. Lo, V. and Humphreys, P. (2000), 'Project management benchmarks for SMEs implementing ISO 9000', Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 247-260
  32. Hill, J. and Wright, L.T. (2001), 'A qualitative research agenda for small to medium-sized enterprises', Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 432-443 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006111
  33. ISO (2000), EN/ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management Systems: Requirements, International Organisation for Standerdisation, Switzerland
  34. Saaty, T.L. (2000)(eds.), Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA
  35. Saaty, T.L. (1996), Multi-criteria Decision Making: The Analytical Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania