Animal cells and systems

The Korean Society for Integrative Biology (한국통합생물학회)
권호 표지

Behavioral Function of the Anomalous Song in the Bush Warbler, Cettia diphone

  • Park, Shi-Ryong (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Cheong, Seok-Wan (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Chung, Hoon (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • Published : 2004.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The bush warblers (Cettia diphone) have been recognized to possess two types of songs: a normal song that plays roles in attracting mate and territorial defense, and an anomalous song. The present study suggests that the anomalous song functions as an alarm signal as well as other unknown signals. Field observations and playback experiments on the anomalous song of bush warbler were conducted in order to investigate the contextual information that occurred between sender and receiver. In the field observation, the males frequently emitted anomalous songs to potential predators. The males responded with an anomalous song to stuffed potential predators. The distance from where the anomalous song occurs to the stimulating source varied depending upon the kinds of stimulus. The males of bush warbler possibly show different responses to the anomalous song depending on the level of danger. When the anomalous song was played back to terrestrial males and females, no distinctive behavior was observed. The anomalous song may be sung to defend the territory against predators or to distract invaders from the nest and female because the male and female behaviors were related with the anomalous song and its phonetic characteristics.

Keywords

References

  1. Amstrong EA (1954) The ecology of distraction display. Br J Anim Behav 11: 121-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-5601(54)80001-3
  2. Blumstein DT (1999) The evolution of functionally referential alarm communication. Evol Comm 3: 135-147 https://doi.org/10.1075/eoc.3.2.03blu
  3. Catchpole CK and Slater PJB (1995) Bird Song. Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 88-90
  4. Charnov EL and Krebs JR (1975) The evolution of alarm calls: a truism or manipulation? Am Nat 109: 107-112 https://doi.org/10.1086/282979
  5. Curio E (1978) The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. 1. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z Tierpsychol 48: 175-183
  6. Dawkins M (1976) The Selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  7. Flasskamp A (1994) The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. 5. An experimental test of the move on hypothesis. Ethology 96: 322-333 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1994.tb01020.x
  8. Gill FB (1995) Ornithology. WH Freeman, New York, pp 340-342
  9. Gill SA and Sealy SG (1996) Nest defence by yellow warblers: recognition of a brood parasite and an avian predator. Behaviour 133: 263-282 https://doi.org/10.1163/156853996X00143
  10. Greig-Smith PW (1981) The Role of alarm responses in the formation of mixed-species flocks of heathland birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8: 7-10 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302839
  11. Hamao S (1992) Lack of pair-bond: a polygynous mating system of the Japanese bush warbler Cettia diphone. Jpn J Ornithol 40: 51-65 https://doi.org/10.3838/jjo.40.51
  12. Hoogland JL (1983) Nepotism and alarm calling in the black-tailed prairie dog, Cynomus ludovicianus. Anim Behav 31: 472-479 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80068-2
  13. Hudson PJ and Newborn D (1990) Brood defence in precocial species: variations in the distraction displays of red grouse, Lagopus lagopus scoticus. Anim Behav 40: 254-261 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80920-0
  14. Hurd CR (1996) Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38: 287-292 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050244
  15. Klump GM and Curio E (1983) Reactions of blue tits Parus caeruleus to hawk models of different sizes. Bird Behav 4: 78-81
  16. Klump GM and Shalter MD (1984) Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context. Z Tierpsychol 66: 189-226 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1984.tb01365.x
  17. Klump GM, Kretzschmar E, and Curio E (1986) The hearing of an avian predator and its avian prey. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8: 317-323 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299662
  18. Knight RL and Temple SA (1986) Nest defence in the American goldfinch. Anim Behav 34: 887-897 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80075-6
  19. Langmore NE and Mulder RA (1992) A novel context for bird vocalization: predator calls prompt male singing in the kleptogamous superb fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus. Ethology 90: 143-153 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00828.x
  20. Lee WS, Koo TH, and Park JY (2000) A Field Guide to the Birds of Korea. LG Sangrok Foundation, Seoul, pp 234-235
  21. Marler P (1955) Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature 176: 6-8 https://doi.org/10.1038/176006a0
  22. Park SR and Park DS (2000) Song type for intrasexual interaction in the bush warbler. Auk 117: 228-232 https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0228:STFIII]2.0.CO;2
  23. Pavey CR and Smyth AK (1998) Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of powerful owls, Ninox Strenua. Anim Behav 55: 313-318 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0633
  24. Pavel V, Weidinger SBK and Kovarik P (2000) Distraction displays in meadow pipit (Anthus pratensis) females in central and northern Europe. Ethology 106: 1007-1019 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00617.x
  25. Pettifor RA (1990) The effects of avian mobbing on a potential predator, the European kestrel, Falco Tinnunculus. Anim Behav 39: 821-827 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80945-5
  26. Ryan MJ (1997) Sexual selection and mate choice. In: Krebs JR and Davies NB (eds), Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach, Cambridge University Press, Oxford, pp 179-202
  27. Sherman PW (1977) Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science 197: 1246-1253 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.197.4310.1246
  28. Smith RJF (1986) Evolution of alarm signals: role of benefits of retaining group members or territorial neighbors. Am Nat 128: 604-610 https://doi.org/10.1086/284591
  29. Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp 585-601
  30. Sordahl TA (1990) The risks of avian mobbing and distraction behavior: an anecdotal review. Wilson Bull 102: 349-352
  31. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46: 35-57 https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
  32. Weatherhead PJ (1989) Nest defence by song sparrows: methodological and life history consideratons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25: 129-136 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302929
  33. Welty JC (1982) The Life of Birds. CBS College Publishing, New York, p 227
  34. Zimmermann U and Curio E (1988) Two conflicting needs affecting predator mobbing by great tits, Parus major. Anim Behav 36: 926-932 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80175-1