DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MICRO-SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN UNDER SIMULATED PULPAL PRESSURE

치수압이 상아질 접착제의 미세전단 결합강도에 미치는 영향에 관한 In vitro 연구

  • Song, Yun-Jung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 송윤정 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2004.07.01

Abstract

The aim of this study was to measure and compare the micro shear bond strengths of the following dentin bonding systems to the dentin surfaces under simulated pulpal pressure: All Bond $2^{\circledR},{\;}Second^{\circledR},{\;}AdheSE^{\circledR}$, Adper Prompt $L-Pop^{\circledR}$. The occlusal surfaces of 180 extracted human molars were prepared so the dentin bonding surfaces could be exposed. The teeth were randomly assigned to 3 equal groups of 60 each and subdivided. The dentin surfaces were treated with the above mentioned bonding system and resin composite cylinders were built up under a simulated pulpal pressure when saline (Group II) or diluted bovine serum (Group III) was used as the pulpal fluid. As a control. the same procedures were performed in the dried dentin surfaces (Group I). After one day of storage in water. the micro shear bond strengths were measured using an EZ tester. Group II and III showed significantly lower shear bond strength than Group I statistically (p < 0.05). $SEbond^{\circledR}{\;}and{\;}AdheSE^{\circledR}$ showed no difference among the different dentin condition. In the Adper Prompt $L-Pop^{\circledR}$. a simulated pulpal pressure were applied to the specimens using diluted bovine serum. which showed a higher strength than the specimens in which saline was used (p < 0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Causton BE. Improved bonding of composite restorative to dentin. Br Dent J 156:83-95, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805282
  2. Komatsu J , Finger W. Correlation of early bond strength with margin gaps. Dent Mater 2: 257-262, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80038-0
  3. Retief DH. In vitro investigation and evaluation of dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1:176-183, 1988
  4. Suzuki T, Finger WJ. Dentin adhesives: Site of dentin versus bonding of composite resins. Dent Mater 4: 379-383, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80053-8
  5. Tagami J, Tao L, Pasheley DH. Correlation among dentin depth, permeability, and bond strength of adhesive resins. Dent Mater 6:45-50, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90044-F
  6. Derkson GD, Pashley DH. Microleakage measurement of selected restorative materials: a new in vitro method. J Prosthet Dent 56:435-440, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90384-7
  7. Pashely DH, Nelson R. Willians EC. Use of dentine-fluid protein concentration to measure pulp capillary reflection coefficients in dogs. Archi Oral Bio 26:703-710, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(81)90185-0
  8. Prati C, Pashley DH, Montanari G. Hydrostatic intra-pulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater 7:54-58, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90028-W
  9. Tao L, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Pulpal pressure and bond strength of SuperBond and Gluma. Am J Dent 4:73-76, 1991
  10. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. De Gee AJ. An investigation into the quality of dentine bonding systems for accomplishing a durable bond. J Oral Rehabil 20:291-300, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01611.x
  11. Augustin SJ, Paul H, Scharer. Perfusing dentine with horse serum or physiologic saline: its effect on adhesion of dentine bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil 25:596-602, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00276.x
  12. Pioch T, Staehle H J, Schneider H. Effect of intrapul-pal pressure simulation in vitro on shear bond strengths and hybrid layer formation. Am J Dent 14:319-323, 2001
  13. Nikaido T, Michael F, Burrow, Tagami J, Takatsu T. Effect of pulpal pressure on adhesion or resin composite to dentine: bovine serum versus saline. Quintessence Inter 26:221-226. 1995
  14. Van Hassel HJ. Physiology of the human dental pulp. Oral Surg 126:120-124, 1971
  15. Sema Belli , Nimet Unlu , Fusun Ozer. Bonding strength to two different surface of dentin under simulated pulpal pressure. J Adhes Dent 3:145-152, 2001
  16. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Cloe BC. Effect of etchant,k surface moisture, and resin composite on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 6:61-64, 1993
  17. Yamauchi J. Study of dental adhesive resin containing phosphoric acid methacrylate monomer. J Japan Dent Mater 5:144-154, 1986
  18. Meerbeek V, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent Suppl 6:119-144, 2001
  19. Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI. Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light cured resin composite on bonding of alI-in-one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 3:207-225, 2001