Analysis of putative promoter sites in Babesia bovis rap-l and B equi ema-l intergenic nucleotides

Babesia bovis rap-1 및 B equi ema-1 intergenic 뉴클레오타이드에서 프로모터로 추정되는 위치 분석

  • 곽동미 (워싱턴주립대학교 수의과대학)
  • Published : 2004.03.01

Abstract

Babesia bovis rap-1 and B equi ema-1 intergenic(IG) nucleotides were analyzed and compared for identifying putative promoter sites using computer programs. The reason to initiate this research was to determine if IG nucleotides of Babesia genes that are predicted to be involved in erythrocyte invasion have functions regulating gene transcription and translation, which can be applied to functional gene knockout. Four IG sequences used included BbIG5(B bovis rap-1 5' IG), BblG3(B bovis rap-1 3' IG), BeIG5(B equi ema-1 5' IG) and BeIG3(B equi ema-1 3' IG). BbIG5 contained a putative promoter at nucleotide 197-246 with a predicted TATA-box and a transcription start site. BbIG3 had a putative promoter at nucleotide 270-320 with two predicted TATA-boxes and a transcription start site. BeIG3 had a putative promoter at nucleotide 155-205 with a predicted TATA-box and a transcription start site. Putative promoter sites in these three sequences mentioned above were identified with score cutoff 0.8, which means detection of about 40% recognized promoters with 0.1-0.4% false positives. In contrast, BeIG5 had a putative promoter at nucleotide 163-213 with score cutoff 0.8, but neither TATA-box nor transcription start site were recognized. However, BeIG5 had a putative promoter at nucleotide 388-438 with a predicted TATA-box and a transcription start site when score cutoff was decreased to 0.18, which means detection of about 70% recognized promoters with 2.2-5.3% false positives. These sequences with putative promoters can be tested if they have functions regulating gene transcription and translation.

Keywords

References

  1. Gray J, von Stedingk LV, Granstrom M. 2002. Zoonotic babesiosis. Int J Med Microbiol 291 Suppl 33 : 108-111
  2. Brown WC, Palmer GH. 1999. Designing blood-stage vaccines against Babesia bovis and B. bigemina. Parasitol Today 15 : 275-281
  3. Mattioli RC, Janneh L, Corr N, et al. 1997. Seasonal prevalence of ticks and tick-transmitted haemoparasites in traditionally managed N'Dama cattle with reference to strategic tick control in the Gambia Med Vet Entomol 11 : 342-348
  4. Lawrence JA, de Vos AJ, 1990. Methods currently used for the control of anaplasmosis and babesiosis: their validity and proposals for future control strategies. Parassitologia 32 : 63-71
  5. Yeruham I, Pipano E, Davidson M. 1985. A field strain of Babesia bovis apparently resistant to amicarbalide isethionate. Trop Anim Health Prod 17 : 29-30
  6. Beveridge E. 1970. Drug resistance in Babesia rodhaini. Br J Pharmacol 39 : 239P-240P
  7. Mosqueda J, McElwain TF, Stiller D, et al. 2002. Babesia bovis merozoite surface antigen 1 and rhoptry-associated protein 1 are expressed in sporozoites, and specific antibodies inhibit sporozoite attachment to erythrocytes. Infect Immun 70 : 1599-1603
  8. Yokoyama N, Suthisak B, Hirata H, et al. 2002. Cellular localization of Babesia bovis merozoite rhoptry-associated protein 1 and its erythrocyte-binding activity. Infect Irnmun 70 : 5822-5826
  9. de Koning-Ward TF, Speranca MA, Waters AP, et al. 1999. Analysis of stage specificity of promoters in Plasmodium berghei using luciferase as a reporter. Mol Biochem Parasitol 100 : 141-146
  10. de Koning-Ward TF, Fidock DA, Thathy V, et al. 2000. The selectable marker human dihydrofolate reductase enables sequential genetic manipulation of the Plasmodium berghei genome. Mol Biochem Parasitol 106 : 199-212
  11. Militello KT, WIrth DF. 2003. A new reporter gene for transient transfection of Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitol Res 89: 154-157 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-002-0721-5
  12. Liston DR, Johnson PJ 1999. Analysis of a ubiquitous promoter element in a primitive eukaryote: early evolution of the initiator element. Mol Cell Biol 19 : 2380-2388