Korean Journal of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회)
권호 표지

Comparative study on avian influenza virus antibody titer by hemagglutination inhibition test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the mass zone layer

산란계 밀집지역에서 혈구응집억제반응과 효소면역측정법을 이용한 가금인플루엔자 혈중항체가의 비교 조사

  • 이정원 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 엄성심 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 이성재 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 서이원 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 서석열 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 정동석 (전라북도축산진흥연구소) ;
  • 송희종 (전북대학교 생체안전성연구소)
  • Published : 2004.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the similarity between hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA), the HI titer and mean ratio S/P ratio) of avian influenza virus. To perform this study, the 1,457 sera of layers 21 farms in May, July and September, respectively. As a result of HI test, positive rates were 480 to 422 (92.1%) in May, 494 to 394(79.8%) in July and 483 to 402(83.2%) in September, and the mean antibody titer were 4.6, 4.3, 4.0 to 0.3 decreased, respectively. The positive rates by ELISA, 480 to 475(99.0%) in May, 494 to 485(98.2%) in July, 483 to 472(97.7%) in September, and the mean S/P ratio were 2.319, 2.557 and 2.380, respectively. The result of HI test and ELISA positive 480 to 422(92.1%), 475(99.0%), 494 to 394(79.8%), 485(98.2%) and 483 to 402(83.2%), 472(97.7%). Therefore, ELISA was shown more sensitive compare the HI titers.

Keywords

References

  1. Gorman OT, Bean WJ, Kawaoka Y, et al. 1991. Evolution of influenza A virus nucleoprotein genes: Implications for the origins of H1N1 human and classical swine viruses. J Virol 65: 3704-3714
  2. Horimoto T, Kaswaoka Y. 2001. Pandemic threat posed by avian influenza A viruses. Clin Microbial Rev 14(1) : 129-149
  3. Rohm C, Zhou N, Suss J, et al. 1996. Characterization of a novel influenza hamegglutinin, H15 : Criteria for determination of influenza A subtypes. Virology 217: 508-516 https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1996.0145
  4. Schild GC, Oxford JS, Newman RW. 1981. Evidence for antigenic variation in influenza A nucleoprotein. Virology 93: 569-573 https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(79)90259-9
  5. Easterday BC, Hinshaw SV, Halvorson DA. 1997. Influenza. In: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, et al. ed. Diseases of poultry, 10th ed, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa: 583-605
  6. Alexander DJ, 2000. A review of avian influenza in different bird species. Vet Microbial 74: 3-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00160-7
  7. 한명국. 박경윤. 권용국 등. 2002. 가금인플루엔자 바이러스 항체검출을 위한 혈청학적 진단 비교법. 대한수의학회지 42(1): 7 3-80
  8. Zhou NN, Shortridge KF, Class ECJ. et al. 1999. Rapid evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in chickens in Hong Kong. J Virol 73(4): 3366-3374
  9. Tumpey TM, Suarez DL, Perkins LEL. et al. 2002. Characterization of a highly pathogenic H5N1. A virus isolated from duck meat. J Virol 76(12): 6344-6355
  10. Dybing JK, Schultz-Cherry S, Swayne DE. et. al. 2000. Distinct pathogenesis of Hong Kong-origin H5N1 viruses in mice compared to that of other highly pathogenic H5 avian influenza viruses. J Viral 74(3): 1443-1450 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.3.1443-1450.2000
  11. Donaelli I, Camptelli L, Trani LD. et al. 2001. Characterization of H5N2 influenza viruses from Italian poultry. J Gen Virol 82(3): 623-630
  12. Kawaoka Y, Nawevw CW, Webster RG. 1984. Is virulence of H5N2 influenza viruses in chickens associated with loss of carbohydrate from the hemagglutinin? Virology 139: 303-316
  13. Bean WJ, Kawaoka Y, Wood JM, et al. 1985. Characterization of virulent and avirulent A/chicken/Pennsylvania/83 influenza A viruses: Potential role of defective interfering RNAs in nature. J Virol 54: 151 -160
  14. Govorkova EA, Leneva IA, Goloubeva OG, et al. 2001. Comparisons of efficacies of RWJ270201, Zanamivir, and Oselramivir against H5N1, H9N2, and other avian influenzaviruses. Antimicrobial Chemother 45(10): 2723-2732 https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.10.2723-2732.2001
  15. Guan Y, Shortridge KF, Krauss S. et. al. 1999. Molecular characterization of H9N2 influenza viruses: Were they the donors of the "internal" genes of H5N1 viruses in Hong Kong? Microbiology 96(16): 363-9367
  16. Xiuhua Lu, Mary Renshaw, Terrence M. Tumpey at al. 2001. Immunity to influenza A H9N2 viruses induced by infection and vaccination. J Virol 75(10): 4896-4901 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.10.4896-4901.2001
  17. Hoffmann E, Stech J, Leneva I. et. al. 2000. Characterization of the influenza A virus gene pool in avian species in Southern China: Was H5N1 a aerivative or a precursor of H5N1? J Virol 74(14): 6309-6315
  18. Suarez DL, Perdue ML, Cox N. et al. 1998. Comparisons of highly virulent H5N1 influenza A viruses isolated from Hong Kong. J Virol 72(8): 6678-6688
  19. Angela N. Cauthen, DE. Swayne, SSC, et al. 2000. Continued circulation in China of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses encoding the hemagglutinin gene associated with the 1997 H5N1 outbreak in poultry and humans. J Virol 47(14): 6592-6599
  20. Gue YJ, Li JG, Cheng XW et al. 1999. Discovery of men infected by avian influenza A(H9N2) virus. J Exp Clin Virol 13: 105-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-6532(99)00027-X
  21. Mase M, lmada T, Sanada Y, et al. 2001. Imported parakeets harbor H9N2 influenza A viruses that are genetically closely related to those transmitted to humans in Hong Kong. J Virol 75(7): 3490-3494 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.7.3490-3494.2001
  22. Lin YP, Shaw M, Gregory V, et al. 2000. Avian-to-human transmission of H9N2 subtype influenza A viruses: Relationship between H9N2 and H5N1 human isolates. PNAS 97(17): 9654-9658 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160270697
  23. Suarez DL, Garcia M, Latimer J, et. al. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of H7 avian influenza viruses isolated from the live bird markets of the northeast United States. J Virol 73(5) : 3567-3573
  24. Guan Y, Shortridge KF, Krauss S, et aI. 2000. H9N2 influenza viruses possessing H5N1-like internal genomes continue to circulate in poultry in southeastern China. J Virol 74(20): 9372-9380 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.20.9372-9380.2000
  25. Mo IP, Song CS, Kim KS, et aI. 1997. An occurrence of non-highly pathogenic avian influenza in Korea. in Proceedings. 4th International Symposium on Avian Irfluenza 379-383
  26. Abraham A, Sivanandan V, Newman JA, et al. 1984. Rapid purification of avian influenza virus for use in ELISA. Am J Vet Res 45: 959-962
  27. Beck JR, Swayne DE. 1997. Evaluation of ELISA for avian influenza serologic and diagnostic programs: Comparison with agar gel precipitin and hemagglutination inhibition tests. in Proceedings. 4th Int Symp Avian Irfluenea : 297-303
  28. Toshihiro I, Hideo G, Eiji Y, et aI. 2001. Generation of a highly pathogenic avain influenza A virus from an avirulent field isolate by passaging in chickens. J Virol 75(9): 4439-4443 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.9.4439-4443.2001
  29. 윤용덕, 강영배, 김종염 등. 1998. 외래동물 질병도감. 동양문화언쇄. 서울: 70-76. 31. 김순재. 강문일. 권혁무 등. 1997. 조류질병학. 선진문화사. 서울 : 103-109
  30. 김순재, 강문일, 권혁무 등. 1997. 조류질병학, 선진문화사, 서울 : 103-109
  31. 최원필, 송희종, 김순재 등. 1994. 수의전염 병학. 경북대학교 출판부. 대구: 428-432
  32. Thayer SG, Beard CW. Serologic procedures. In: Swayne DE, Glisson JR, Jackwood MW, et al., ed. 1998. A laboratory manual for the isolation and identificauion of avian pathogens, 4th ed, Rose Printing, Tallahassee, Florida: 255-266
  33. 성환우, 이재길, 이윤정 등. 2002. 국내유행 가금인푸루엔자 바이러스의 특성 및 진단법 개선연구. 국립수의과학원. 건양인쇄사: 510-520
  34. Beard CW. 1970. Avian influenza antibody detection by immunodiffusion. Avian Dis 14: 337-341 https://doi.org/10.2307/1588477
  35. Alexander Dl, 1982. Allan WH. Avian influenza in turkeys : a survey of farms in eastern England 1979/80. Br Vet J 138: 473-479
  36. Abraham A, Sivanandan V, Halvorson DA, et al. 1986. Standardization of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for avian influenza virus antibodies In turkey. Am J Vet Res 47: 561-566
  37. Fatunmbi OO, Newman JA, Sivanandan V, et al. 1989. A broad spectrum avian influenza subtype antigen for indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Avian Dis 33: 264-269 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590842