Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지

Experience of Gastric Cancer Survivors and their Spouses in Korea: Secondary Analysis

  • Yi, Myungsun (College of Nursing Seoul National University) ;
  • Kahn, David (The University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing)
  • Published : 2004.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of gastric cancer couples in Korea and to generate a substantive theory integrating the experiences of gastric cancer survivors and their spouses as a whole. The specific aims of this study were to explore major problems gastric cancer couples faced and how they resolved these problems, focusing on inter-relational dynamics within the couples and on similarities and differences between the couples. Methods. This was a secondary analysis study using grounded theory techniques. The study used the data of 11 married couples which was collected from in-depth interviews from two primary studies. The unit of analysis was dyads of gastric cancer survivors and their spouses. Results. The basic social psychological process that emerged from the analysis was 'taking charge of their health.' Major categories involved in this process were identified as 1) adjusting to new diets, 2) reinforcing physical strength, 3) seeking information, 4) strengthening Ki, 5) lowering life-expectations, and 6) going their separate ways. These six categories represent major strategies in overcoming critical problems that occurred in day-to-day experiences. In terms of the process, the first five categories characterize the earlier stage of the process of 'taking charge of their health,' while 'going their separate ways' indicates the later stage and also the beginning of their separate ways: 'pursuing spiritual life' for the survivors, and 'preparing for the future' for the spouses. Conclusions. The results of this study will help design family care for the people with gastric cancer by providing in-depth understanding and insight on the lives of gastric cancer couples.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersen B., Anderson B. & deProsse C. (1989) Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer: II. Psychological outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 57, 692-697
  2. Baider L., Koch U., Esacson R. & De-Nour A. K. (1998) Prospective study of cancer patients and their spouses: The weakness of marital strength. Psychooncology 7(1), 49-56 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199801/02)7:1<49::AID-PON312>3.0.CO;2-Z
  3. Baldacchino D. & Draper P. (2001) Spiritual coping strategies: A review of the nursing research literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing 34(6), 833-841
  4. Cassileth B., Lusk E., Brown L. & Cross P. (1986) Psychosocial status of cancer patients and next-of-kin: Normative data from the Profile of Mood States. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 3, 99-105 https://doi.org/10.1300/J077v03n03_08
  5. Chang S. O. (2001) Meaning of Ki related to touch in caring. Holistic Nursing Practice 16(1), 73-84
  6. Coward D. D. (1990) The lived experience of self-transcendence in women with advanced breast cancer. Nursing Science Quarterly 3, 162-169
  7. Coward D. D. (1991) Self-transcendence and emotional well-being in women with advanced breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 18, 857-863
  8. Ell K. M., Nishimoto R., Nantell J. & Hamovitch M. (1988) Longitudinal analysis of psychological adaptation among family members of patient with cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 32, 429-438
  9. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2003). DVD-ROM
  10. Germino B. B., Fire B. L. & Funk S. G. (1995) Cancer and the partner relationship: What is its meaning? Seminars in Oncology Nursing 11(1), 43-50
  11. Glaser B. (1978) Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley: CA: Sociology Press
  12. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981) Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  13. Hannur J. W., Gresi-Davis J. G., Harding K. & Hatfield A. K. (1991) Effects of individual and marital variables on coping with cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 9, 1-20
  14. Hawks S. R., Hull M. L., Thalman R. L. & Richins P. M. (1995) Review of spiritual health: Definition, role, and intervention strategies in health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 99(5), 371-378
  15. Heidrich S. M., Forsthoff C. A. & Ward S. E. (1994) Psychological adjustment in adults with cancer: The self as mediator. Health Psychology 13(5), 346-353 https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.13.4.346
  16. Hicks S. J. (2001) Gastric cancer: diagnosis, risk factors, treatment and life issues British Journal of Nursing 10(8), 529-536
  17. Higgins E. T. (1987) Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94, 1143-1150
  18. Higgins E. T., Bond R. N., Klein R. & Strauman T. (1986) Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 5-15 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.5
  19. Hinds P. S., Vogel R. J. & Clarke-Steffen L. (1997) The possibilities and Pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research 7(3), 408-424
  20. Hofstede G. (1980) Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  21. Holmberg S. K., Scott L., Alexy W. & Fife B. L. (2001) Relationship issues of women with breast cancer. Cancer Nursing 24(1), 53-60
  22. Hoskins C. N. (1995a) Patterns of adjustment among women with breast cancer and their partners. Psychological Reports 77, 1107-1108
  23. Hoskins C. N. (1995b) Adjustment to breast cancer in couples. Psychological Reports 77(2), 435-454
  24. Leininger M. & McFarland M. (2002) Transcultural nursing: Concepts, theories, research and practices (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
  25. Montbriand M. L. (1995) Alternative therapies as control behaviours used by cancer patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing 22(4), 646-654
  26. Morse S. R. & Fife B. (1998) Coping with a partner's cancer: Adjustment at four stages of the illness trajectory. Oncology Nursing Forum 25(4), 751-760
  27. National Cancer Center. (2003) Cancer registration statistics. http://www.ncc.re.kr Goyang-si, Korea. (Accessedon April 23, 2003)
  28. Northouse L. (1989) A longitudinal study of the adjustment of patients and husbands to breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 16, 511-516
  29. Northouse L. L., Mood D., Templin T., Mellon S. & George T. (2000) Couples' patterns of adjustment to colon cancer. Social Science & Medicine 50(2), 271-84
  30. O'Connor K. G. (1999) Gastric cancer. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 15(1), 26-5
  31. Petrie W., Logan J. & DeGrasse C. (2001) Research review of the supportive care needs of spouse of women with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 28(10), 1601-1607
  32. Rosenberg M. (1986) Conceiving the self. Malabar, FL: Krieger
  33. Sandelowski M. (1986) The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science 8, 27-37
  34. Sawyers J. E. & Eaton L. (1992) Gastric cancer in the Korean-American: cultural implications. Oncology Nursing Forum 19(4), 619-23
  35. Shin K. R. (2001) Developing perspectives on Korean nursing theory: The influences of Taoism. Nursing Science Quarterly 14(4), 346-53
  36. Silver-Aylaian M. & Cohen L. H. (2001) Role of major lifetime stressors in patients' and spouses' reaction to cancer. Journal of Traumatic Stress 14(2), 405-412
  37. Steeves R. H., Kahn D. L. & Cohen M. Z. (1996) Asking substantive theory questions of naturalistically derived data. Western Journal of Nursing Research 18(2), 418-431
  38. Strauss A. & Corbin J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications
  39. Szabo V. & Strang V. R. (1997) Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Advances in Nursing Science 20(2), 66-74
  40. Thorne S. (1994) Secondary analysis in qualitative research: Issues and implications. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 263-279). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  41. Thorne S. (1998) Ethical and representational issues in qualitative secondary analysis. Qualitative Health Research 8(4), 547-555
  42. Walker B. L. (1997) Adjustment of husbands and wives to breast cancer. Cancer Practice 5(20), 92-98
  43. Werner O. & Campbell D. T. (1970) Translating, working through interpretation and the problems of decentering. In R. Narill & R. Cohen (Eds.),A Handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 398-420). NY:The Natural History Press