가정간호대상자의 건강상태 결과 평가도구 개발

The Development of a Client Health Status Outcome Evaluation Instrument in Home Care

  • 발행 : 2004.06.01

초록

Purpose: This study was to develop a client health status outcome evaluation instrument, and examine content validity, reliability, construct validity, and the acceptability of this instrument. Method: A preliminary list was made of such key information as standards, criteria, indicators and measures, by means of a broad review of literature within the field. After determining the preliminary instruments, the study sought to obtain examination, consensus, and modification of two groups of experts in the home-care field. Finally, the instrument examined content validity, reliability, construct validity, and the acceptability of this instrument. Result: The tool was considered of 13 criteria, 48 indicators, and 167 detail measures. The content validity index of the tool was above 0.8 according to the expert group. Regarding the reliability of the evaluators of standards 1 and 2, the degree of agreement between evaluators was high(96.4% through 98.2%). Construct validity in this study, the difference in the mean score between the baseline point and the follow up point of each of standards 1 and 2 was significant, and the mean score of the follow up point was more than that of the baseline point. After examining the acceptability of this instrument with practice managers and home care nurses in home care institutions, a positive opinion was given of this instrument, and it was indicated that to be useful and applicable in home care practice. Conclusion: The results of evaluating client outcome will contribute to overall outcome-based quality improvement and service marketing in home care by providing a constant gauge of home care effectiveness.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams, C. E., Kramer, S., Wilson, M. (1995). Home health quality outcomes. J of Nurs Admin, 25(11), 39-45
  2. Alexy, B., Richardean, B. D., Brown, S. (2001). Home health and client outcomes. Home Health Nurs, 19(4), 233-239
  3. Beech, B. (1999). Go the extra mile-use the Delphi Technique. J of Nurs Manage, 7(5), 281-288
  4. Chrispin, P. S., Scotton, H., Rogers, J., Lloyd, D., Ridley, S. A. (1997). Short Form 36 in the intensive care unit : assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Anaesthesia, 52(1), 15-23
  5. Cohen, J., Sayor, C., Holzemer, W. L. Gornber, B. (2000). Linking Nursing Care Interventions with Client Outcome : A Community Based Application of an Outcome Model. J of Nurs Care Qual, 15(1), 22-31
  6. Donabedian, A. (1988). Quality assessment and assurance: Unity of purpose, diversity of means, Inquiry, Spring, 25, 173-192
  7. Gaberson, K. B. (1997). Measurement reliability and validity. AORN, 66(6), 1092-1094
  8. Hasson, F., Keeney, S., McKenna, H. (2000). Research guideline for the Delphi survey technique. J of Advan Nurs, 32(4), 1008-1015
  9. Hwang, N. M., Chang, I. S., et al. (1999). Model development of home health care of medical institution, KlHASA
  10. Irvine, D., O'Brien-Pallas, L. L., Murray, M., Cockerill, R., Sidani, S., Laurie-Shaw, B., Lochhaas-Gerlach, J. (2000). The reliability and validity of two health status measures for evaluating outcomes of home care nursing. Res in Nurs & Health, 23: 43-54
  11. Jean S. (2000). Creating the Outcome Framework. Outcome Manage for Nurs Practice, 4(1), 28-33
  12. Kane, R. L. (1997). Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. An Aspen Publicaton
  13. Kantz, M. E., Harris, W. J., Levitsky, K., Ware, J. E., Davies, A. R. (1992). Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Medical Care, 30(5), 240-252
  14. Lang, N. M., & Market, K. D. (1990). The Classification of Patient Outcomes, J of Prof Nurs, 6(3), 158-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(05)80146-2
  15. Linda, H. K. (1999). Optimizing Clinical and Financial outcomes in Home Care : A Niche Program Approach. Topics in Geriat Rehab, 14(4), 68-81
  16. Lipsett, P. A., Swoboda, S. M., Campbell, K. A., Cornwell, E., Dorman, T., Pronovost, P. J. (2000). Sickness Impact Profile Score versus a Modified Short -Form Survey for Functional Outcome Assessment : Acceptability, Reliability, and Validity in Critically III Patients with Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stays. The J of Trauma, 49(4), 737-743
  17. Maciejewski, M. (1997). Generic measures: Understamding health care outcomes research. An Aspen Publication
  18. Meisenheimer, C. G. (1987). Indics of Quality on Home Health Care :Perception of clients, nurses and administrator. A Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  19. Moon J. S. (1999). Nursing Research, Shinkwang Publication.
  20. Paisley, A. M., Baldwin, P., Parterson-Brown, S. (2001). Feasibility, reliability and validity of new assessment form for use with basic surgical trainess. The American J of Surg, 182(1), 24-29
  21. Park, H. T. (2001). Development of conceptual framework for quality improvement of home care, Research report, College of Nursing of Seoul National University, unpublished
  22. Park, H. T. (2002). The development of client outcome evaluation instruments in home care. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University
  23. Park, J. H., Kim, M. J., Hong, K. ., Han. K. J., Park, S. A., Yoon, S. N., Bang, K. S. (2000). Development and analysis of community based independent home care nursing service, J Korean Acad Nurs, 30(6), 1455-1466
  24. Patrick, D. L. (1990). Assessing health-related quality of life outcomes: Effectives and outcomes in health care: Proceedings of an Invitational Conference by the Institute of medicine, Division of Health Care Services. Washington, DC. National Academy Press
  25. Phillips, C. D., Morris, J. N., Hawes, C. F. (1997). Association of the resident assessment instrument(RAI) with changes in function, cognition, and psychosocial status. The J of the Amer Geriat Soc, 45(8), 986-993
  26. Shaughnessy, P. W., Criser, K. S., Schlenker, R. E., Arnold, A. G., Kramer, A. M., Powell, M. C. & Mittle, D. F. (1994). Measuring and assuring the Home Health Care. Health Care Finan Rev, 16(1), 35-68
  27. Shaughnessy, P. W., Crisler, katheryn, S. Schlenker, Robert E. (1998). Outcome-based quality improvement in home health care: The OASIS indicators. Qual and the Health Care Cont, 18(4), 59-68
  28. Ware, J. E., Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-ltems Short-Form Health Survey(SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-483 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002