생명과학회지 (Journal of Life Science)

  • 제14권4호
  • /
  • Pages.537-540
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1225-9918(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3406(eISSN)
한국생명과학회 (Korean Society of Life Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

닭에 있어서의 Caecostomy (맹장으로 튜브를 삽입하는) 기술

A Technique for Caecostomy in the Chicken

  • Son, Jang-Ho (Department of Practical Arts Education, Daegu National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.08.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

닭 맹장으로의 뇨의 역류량을 측정하기 위해서 Caecostomy (맹장으로 튜브를 삽입하는 수술)기술이 개발되었다. 시술 이틀 뒤부터 맹장에 튜브가 장착된 닭은 20m1의 따뜻한 생리적 식염수를 이용하여 격일간격으로 10일 동안 맹장에 장착된 튜브를 환류시켰다. 시술후 닭은 일시적으로 식욕과 활기가 감퇴되었지만, 몇일내에 정상으로 회복되었다. 수술로 인해 생긴 상처는 시술 10일내에 아물었다. 맹장에 장착된 튜브와 총배설강에 외과적으로 시술된 프라스틱 채집병을 이용하여서 배설물이 매일 모아졌다. 사후검사에서 맹장에 삽입되었던 고무튜브주위를 둘러싸고 있는 완벽한 맹장이 확인되었다.

A caecostomy technique (surgery for inserting tube into caeca) was developed to quantify urine backflow into the caeca. Two days post-surgery, caecostomised chickens were flushed with 20 ml of warm saline solution every other day for 10 days. After surgery birds temporarily lost appetite and activity, but they were restored gradually in a few days. The incision healed within 10 days post-surgery. Excreta were collected daily from caecal tubing and cloaca by surgical attachment of polyethylene collection vessels to the chickens. Post-mortem examinations ascertained that the caeca were intact around the Latex tubing.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adeola, O., D. Ragland and D. King. 1997. Feeding and excreta collection techniques in metabolizable energy assays for ducks. Poul. Sci. 76, 728-732 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.5.728
  2. Akester, A. R., R. S. Anderson, K. J. Hill and G. W. Osbaldiston. 1967. A radiographic study of urine flow in the domestic fowl. Br. Poul. Sci. 8, 209-212 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071666708415670
  3. Barnes E. M. and C. S. Impey. 1974. The occurrence and properties of uric acid decomposing anaerobic bacteria in the avian caecum. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 37, 393-409 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1974.tb00455.x
  4. Bjornhg, C. and I. Sperber. 1977. Transport of various food components through the digestive tract of turkey, geese and guinea fowl. Swed. J. Agri. Re. 7, 57-66
  5. Clark, P. L. 1978. The structure of the ileo-caeco-colic junction of domestic fowl (GALLUS GALLUS L.). Br. Poul. Sci. 19, 595-600 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667808416519
  6. Clemens, E.T., C. E. Steens and M. Southworth. 1975. Sites of organic acid production and pattern of digesta movement in the gastrointestinal tract of geese. J. Nutri. 105, 1341-1350
  7. Cunningham, M and Acker, D. 2001 Animal Science and Industry. pp. 92, 6th eds., Prentice-Hall. Inc., New Jersey
  8. Duke, G. E. 1989. Relationship of cecal and colonic motility to diet, habitat and cecal anatomy in several avian species. J. Experi. Zool. 3, 338-47
  9. Fenna, L. D. and A. Boag. 1974. Filling and emptying of the galliform caecum. Canadi. J. Digestion Dis. 52, 537-540
  10. Gasaway, W. C., D. F. Hollemen and R. G. White. 1975. Flow of digesta in the intestine and caecum of the rock ptarmigan.Condor 77, 467-474 https://doi.org/10.2307/1366093
  11. Karasawa, Y. and M. Maeda. 1992. Effect of colostomy on the utilization of dietary nitrogen in the fowl fed on a low protein diet. Br. Poul. Sci. 33, 815-820 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669208417523
  12. Karasawa, Y. and M. Maeda. 1994. Role of caece in the nitrogen nutrition of the chicken fed on a moderate protein diet or a low protein diet plus urea. Br. Poul. Sci. 35, 815-820 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669408417703
  13. Karasawa, Y., T. Ono and K. Koh. 1994. Inhibitory effect of penicillin on caecal urease activity in chickens fed on a low protein diet plus urea. Br. Poul. Sci. 35, 157-160 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669408417681
  14. Koike, T. I. and L. D. McFarland. 1966. Urography in the unanaesthetized hydropenic chicken. Ameri. J. Vet. Re. 27, 1130-1133
  15. Lai, H. C. and G. E. Duke. 1978. Colonic motility in domestic turkeys. Ameri. J. Digestive Dis. 23, 673-681 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072351
  16. McLelland, J. 1989. Anatomy of the avian cecum. J. Experi. Zool. 3, 2-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402520503
  17. Mortensen, A. and A. R. Tindall. 1984. The role of urea in nitrogen excretion and cecal nitrogen metabolism in willow ptarmigan. J. Compar. Physiol. 155B, 71-74 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00688793
  18. O'Dell, B. L., W. D. Wood, O. A. Laerdal, A. M. Jeffay and J. E. Savage. 1960. Distribution of the major nitrogenous compounds and amino acids in chicken urine. Poul. Sci. 39, 426-431 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0390426
  19. Pudelkiewicz, W. J., W. W. Stutz and L. D. Matterson. 1968. Determination of uric acid in avian excreta by use of uricase and differential spectrophotometry. Poul. Sci. 47, 1274-1277 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0471274
  20. Rhoades, D. D. and G. E. Duke. 1977. Cineradiographic studies of gastric motility in great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus). Condor 79, 328-334 https://doi.org/10.2307/1368010
  21. Son, J. H. and Y. Karasawa. 2000. Effect of removal of caecal contents on nitrogen utilization and nitrogen excretion in caecally ligated chickens fed a low protein diet supplemented with urea. Br. Poul. Sci. 41, 69-71 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660086420
  22. Son, J. H., Y. Karasawa and K. H. Nahm. 2000. Effect of caecectomy on growth, moisture in excreta, gastrointestinal passage time and uric acid excretion in growing chicks. Br. Poul. Sci. 41, 72-74 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660086439
  23. Son, J. H. and Y. Karasawa. 2001. Effect of cecal ligation and colostomy on water intake and excretion in chicken. Br. Poul. Sci. 42, 130-133 https://doi.org/10.1080/713655023
  24. Son, J. H., D. Ragland and O. Adeola. 2002. Quantification of digesta flow into the caeca of roosters. Br. Poul. Sci. 43, 322-324 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120121562