A Historical Review on Aesthetic Characteristics of Male Elegance in Dress

  • Ko, Hyun-Zin (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2004.06.01

Abstract

Elegance in dress has been mentioned as an important term for explaining a beauty of dress and a fashion image through the times in the history of dress. Nevertheless, it has been spoken indeterminately without analyzing the accurate meaning. In addition, almost all the scattered discourses of it were very limited to womenswear. The purpose of this study is to provide a framework for a better understanding of the concept of elegance and its aesthetic characteristics expressed visually on dress from the holistic viewpoint, focusing on male elegance in dress. To obtain the purpose, the documentary study and the practical analysis were carried out. Elegance in dress is based upon the idea of aristocratic taste cultivated by good breeding. It is expressed visually through not only the carefully contrived dress but also a sort of aura of dressed body with skillful ease. Its aesthetic values consist of luxury, nobility, refinement, femininity, harmony. Though male elegant styles had already existed throughout the history of dress, it was Mannerism in the 16th century which expressed ‘studied elegance’ for the first time. On the grounds of both the classification of periodic styles and the periodic values, they can be defined and categorized into Mannerism Elegance, Salon Elegance, Modern Elegance Since Dandyism, Aestheticism Elegance. In the late 20th century they can be recognised as Classic Dandyism Elegance, Soft Casual Elegance, Elaborate Heroic Elegance. Although male elegance in dress has been visualized in different ways depending on periodic values, it has essentially been a refined beauty of high class which was valued until recent years. Its common plastic features appear as soft shapes, subtle colors and delicate fabrics modulated with exquisiteness and well-adorned appearance, graceful behavior make elegant styles completed. All of elegant styles have m common with refinement, harmony as main aesthetic values.

Keywords

References

  1. Anspach. Karlyne (1967). The why of fashion. The Iowa State University Press
  2. Ash, J. & Wilson, E. (1992). Chic thrills: A fashion reader. London: Pandora.
  3. Ashelford, J. (1996). The art of dress: Clothes and society 1500-1914. NY: Harry N. Abrams
  4. Boston, L. (1998). Men of color: Fashion, history, fundamental. NY: Artisan
  5. Boucher, F. (1987). A history of costume in the west. NY: Thames & Hudson
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1997). La distinction: Critique du jugement, Tras. Choi, Jongchul, Seoul: Saemoolkael Publishing Co
  7. Conekin, B. (2000. 12). Fashioning the playboy: Message of style and masculinity in the pages of playboy magazine, 1953-1963. Ed. Steele, V. Fashion Theory-The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture, Issue 4, Dec. 2000
  8. Contini, M. No Date. Fashion-from ancient egypt to the present day, NY: Crescent Books
  9. Craine, D. (2000). Fashion & its social agenda: Class, gender & identity in clothing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  10. Craik, J. (2002). The face of fashion. Trans. Jung, Inhee, Seoul: Poolunsol Co
  11. Dariaux, G. A. (1964). Elegance: A complete guide for every woman who wants to be well and properly dressed on all occasion. NY: Doubleday & Company
  12. Davis, F. (1992). Fashion, culture, and identity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  13. Diassailly, G. No Date. Age of elegance: Five thousand years of fashion and frivolity. Hachette
  14. Eicher, J. (2001. 12). Elegance in dress: A cross-cultural view. International Journal of Costume, Vol. 1
  15. Evans, C. and Thornton, M. (1989). Women and fashion. NY: Quartet Books
  16. Farid, C. (1996). Jean paul gaultier. London: Thames and Hudson
  17. Griffin, S. (2002). The book of the courtesans. Trans. Noh, Haesook. Seoul: Hainam
  18. Jang, Moonho (1975). The aesthetics of dress. Seoul: Seoul National Univ. Press
  19. Cho, Kyuwha (1989). The aesthetics of dress. Seoul: Suhak Publishing Co
  20. Lee, Jungmin (1998). Dandyism in the 19th century men's fashion. Master's Thesis, Seoul National Univ.
  21. Lehmann, U. (2000). Tigersprung: Fashion in modernity. Massachusetts: MIT Press
  22. Lincourt, M. (1999). In search of elegance: Towards an architecture of satisfaction. Quebec: McGill-Queen's University Press
  23. Lipovetsky, G. (1999). The empire of fashion. Trans. Lee, Deujae. Seoul: Moonyae Publishing Co
  24. McNeil, P. (1999. 9). That doubtful gender: Macaroni dress and male sexualities. Ed. Steele, V. Fashion theory: Dress, body, culture, Issue 4, Vol. 3
  25. McDowell, C. (1992). Dressed to kill, sex power and clothes. Hutchinson
  26. Mendes, V. & de la Haye, A. (1999). 20th century fashion. London: Thames & Hudson
  27. Nuzzi, C. (1980). Fashion in paris: From the 'Journal des Dames et des Modes' 1912-1913. Thames and Hudson
  28. The oxford english dictionary. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press
  29. Schiller, F. (1999). Aesthetics of schiller. Trans. lang, Sangyong. Inchon: Inha Univ. Press
  30. Steele, V. (1988). Paris fashion: A cultural history. NY: Oxford University Press
  31. Steele, V. (1992). Fifty years offashion-new look to now, New Haven: Yale University Press
  32. Tatarkiewicz, W. (1992). A history of six ideas: An essay in Aesthetics. Tran. Son, Hyojoo. Seoul: Mijin Publishing Co
  33. Watt, J.(Ed.). (1999). Fashion writing. London: Viking
  34. Webster's 3rd new international dictionary. Springfield: G & C Merriam Company, 1961
  35. Wilson, E. (1985). Adorned in dreams. London: Virago Press
  36. Wilson, E. (1998. 9). Bohemian dress and the heroism of everyday life. Ed. Steele. V. Fashion theory: Dress, body. culture, Issue 3, Vol. 2
  37. 竹內敏雄 (1989). The encyclopedia of aesthetics. Seoul: Mijin Publishing Co
  38. 落合正勝 (2001). Man's dress elements of elegance. Trans. Lee, Youjung, Seoul: Namoowasoup Publishing Co
  39. http://dic.empas.comf
  40. http://kr.engdic.yahoo.com/