Nutrition Behaviour of Families with Low-Income

  • Jacqueline Koehler (Institute of Nutritional Science, Nutrition Education and Consumer Behaviour, University of Giessen,Germany) ;
  • Stephanie Lehmkuehler (Institute of Nutritional Science, Nutrition Education and Consumer Behaviour, University of Giessen,Germany) ;
  • Ingrid-Ute Leonhaeuser (Institute of Nutritional Science, Nutrition Education and Consumer Behaviour, University of Giessen,Germany)
  • Published : 2004.06.01

Abstract

Poverty is an important issue, not only in developing countries but also in industrialised societies. In 1999 15% of the European population have been in risk of poverty and the number of people living in poverty in Germany continues to increase. As poverty concerns all aspects of life, it influences health, well-being and the nutrition of the people living on low-income. Although this problem is obvious, only few surveys have been conducted to analyse it and therefore there is only limited information on the nutritional situation and nutrition behaviour of the poor. A qualitative study, which looked closely at the nutrition behaviour of 15 low-income families, was carried out in Giessen, Germany. The results showed that the nutritional situation of poor families differs from that families with a higher income have, the reasons being that their scope for action is restricted by a shortage of money and that there is a lack of skills and knowledge to provide family members with adequate nutrition. Strategies to improve the nutrition situation of poor families should aim at encouraging them to acquire relevant information and appropriate skills to adopt a healthier diet within their financial, social and cultural constraints. Also there have to be socio-political arrangements, which improve existing financial and social provisions as well as preventive educational measures.

Keywords

References

  1. BUNDESMINISTERIUM FUER ARBEIT UND SOZIALES (2001). Lebenslagen in Deutschland. Der erste Armuts- und Reichtumsbericht der Bundesregierung. (Life circumstances in Germany. First Poverty and wealth report of the Federal German Government), Bonn
  2. DEUTSHE GESELLCHAFT FUER ERNAEHRUNG (ED. 2000A). Ernaehrungebericht 2000. (German Nutrition Report 200) Frankfurt am Main.
  3. DEUTCHE GESLLSCHAFT FUER ERNAEHRUNG (ED. 2000B). Vollwertig essen und trinken nach den 10 Regeln der DGE (Healthy eating and drinking according to the 10 rules of the DGE) Frankfurt am Main.
  4. DEUTSCHE GESELLSCHAFT FUER HAUSWIRTSCHAFT (ED 2003). Konepte und Modelle zur Armutspravention. (Concepts and and models for preventing poverty) Dokumentation der Fachatagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Hauswirtschaft. Berlin
  5. DOBSON B. (1997). The Paradox of Want Amidst Plenty : From Food Poverty to Sicial Exclusion. In: Koehler et al (eds.):Poverty and Food in Welfare Societies. Edition sigma: Berlin
  6. DOWLER E ET AL (1997). Poverty, Food and nutrition. In : Koehler et al (eds.): Poverty and Food in Welfare Societies. Edition sigma: Berlin.
  7. DOWLER E; CALVERT C (1997). Budgeting for food on state benefits: poor lone-parents in the United Kingom. In: Koehler et al (eds.): Poverty and Food in Welfare Societies. Edition sigma: Berlin
  8. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2003). The social situation in the European Union 2003. Eurostat: http://www.eu-datashop.de/download/EN/inhaltsv/thema3/so_lage.pdf
  9. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2000). Lisbon European Council 23/24 March 2000 - Presidency conclusions 32. http://www.europarl,eu.int/summits/lis1_en.htm
  10. HESEKER H (2002). Fachwissenschaftliche Analyse von Ernaehrungsthemen in Schulbuechern. (Scientific analysis of nutrition topics in shoolbooks) In: DGE-info 4/2002
  11. JOHNSON-DOWN L ET AL (1997). High prevalence of obesity in low-income and multiethnic schoolchildrenl: a diet and physical assessment. In : Journal of Nutrition(127): 2310-2315
  12. KAMENSKY J ET AL (1997). Living situation and health of welfare recipients in Germany. In: Koehler B.M. et al (eds). The impact of poverty on nutrition behavior in young Europeans. Poverty and Food in Wehlfare Societies. Berlin: Sigma
  13. KARG G ET AL (1997). Nutrition in the Federal Republic of germany: Exploring the Influence of the Socio-Economic Situation of Households. In : Koerhler B.M. et al(eds). The impact of poverty on nutrition behavior in young Europeans. Poverty and Food in Welfare Societies. Berlin: Sigma.
  14. KENNEDY L; LING M (1997). Nutrition education for low-income groups-is there a role? In : Koehler B.M. et al (eds). The impact of poverty on nutrition behavior in young Europeans. Poverty and Food in Welfare Societies. Berlin: Sigma
  15. KINRA S ET AL (2000). Deprivation and childhood obesity: a cross sectional study of 20973 children in Plymouth, UK. In: Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 54:456-460. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.6.456
  16. KLEIN-PLATAT C ET AL (2003). Prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of overweight in young French adolescents. In: Diabetes Metab Res Review (2): 153-158 https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.368
  17. KLOCKE A (1997). The impact of poverty on nutritioin behavior in young Europeans. In Koehler B.M. et al (eds). Poverty adn Food in Welfare Societies. Berlin: Sigma
  18. KOEHLER B M ET AL (EDS.1997). Poverty and Food in Welfare Societies. Edition sigma: Berlin.
  19. KOEHLER J (2001). Ernaehrungssituation von Kindern in einkommensarmen Haushalteneine kritische Literaturanalyse. (Nutrition situation of children in low-income families) unpublishe diploma thesis. Juster-Liebig-Univerity, Giessen.
  20. LAITINEN S ET AL (1995). Diet of finish children in relation to the family's socioeconomic status. In: Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 23 (2): 88-94 https://doi.org/10.1177/140349489502300203
  21. LEHMKUEHLER S (2002). Die Giessener Ernaehrungsstudie ueber das Emaehrungsverhalten von Armutshanushalten (GESA): qulitative Fallstudien. (Nutrition behaviour of poor households - a qualitative case study in the City of Giessen) Giessen, Justus-Liebig-Universitaet, Dissertation (Phd-thesis). http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2002/825/
  22. LEHMKUEHLER S; LEONHAEUSER I-U (1998A). Untersuchung des Ernaehrungsveraltens von ausgewaehlten Familien mit vermindertem Einkommen in Giessen. Forch
  23. LEHMKUEHLER S; LEONHAEUSER I-U (1998B). Armut und Ernaehrung. (Poverty and nutrition) In: Spiegel der Forschung (15): 74-82.
  24. LEONHAEUSER I-U; LEHMKUEHLER S (2003). Armut und Ernaehrung-Zum Stand der Forschung und Forschungsperspektiven. (Poverty and nutrition - status quo and perspecitives of research) In: Konzepte und Modelle zur Armutspravention. Dokumentation der Fachtagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Hauswirtschaft. Berlin: 67-73
  25. MEIER U (2000). Giessen- Kommunaler Armutsbericht. (Communal Poverty Report of the City of Giessen) MAGISTRAT DER UNIVERSITAETSSTADT GIESSEN (EDS.)
  26. REICKS M ET AL (1994). Factors affecting consumption of fruits and vegetables by low-income families. In: Journal of the American Dietic Association 94 (11): 1309-1311 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8223(94)92467-8
  27. ROOS E ET AL (1996). Modern and healthy? Socioeconomic differences in the qulity of diet. In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 50: 753-60
  28. ROTH, R (1992). Uber den Monat am Ende des Geldes. (How to deal) AG TUWAS. Frankfurt
  29. RUXTON CHS: KIRK TR (1996). Relationships between social class, nutrient intake and dietary patterns in Edinburgh schoolchildren. In: Journal of Food Science and Nutrition 47:341-349 https://doi.org/10.3109/09637489609041034
  30. SMITH GD; BRUNNER E (1997). Socioeconomic differentials in health: the role of nutrition. In: Proceediings of the Nutrition Society (56): 75-90 https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS19970011
  31. STATISTISCHES BUNDESAMT (ED. 2002). Datenreport 2002. Zahlen und Fakten uber die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. (Data report 2002- facts about the Federal Republic of Germany).
  32. TOWNSEND, P (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. A survey of household resources and standards of living. Pengun: Middlesex, UK.