DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Overwintering of the Pathogen and Factors Affecting Disease Develpoment of Rice Brown Spot Caused by Cochliobolus miyabeanus

벼깨씨무늬병균의 월동과 발병조건에 관한 연구

  • 예완해 (농업과학기술원 식물병리과) ;
  • 이훈섭 (농업과학기술원 식물병리) ;
  • 김용기 (농업과학기술원 식물병리) ;
  • 심홍식 (농업과학기술원 식물병리) ;
  • 지형진 (농업과학기술원 식물병리) ;
  • 남기웅 (농업과학기술원 식물병리과)
  • Published : 2004.06.01

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate factors affecting disease development of rice brown spot caused by Cochliobolus miyabeanus in the field and under the greenhouse conditions. In normal paddy fields, the pathogen was more frequently isolated from dried rice straws than wet straws after overwintering. The pathogen was also readily isolated from wet rice straws of salty paddy fields although infection rate of the fields was low. The disease symptom was first observed at 2 to 3days after inoculation when the seedlings were kept for 6 hours in dew chamber. The number of lesions peaked at 14 hr incubation in cultivars Chucheongbyeo and 24 hr incubation in cultivar Daesanbyeo and Tetep. Sixty three-d-old seedlings were more susceptible than 21 to 49-d-old seedlings regardless of cultivar. There was some difference in number of lesions observed, but the lesions were evenly spread regardless of leaf position. Light on the rice seedlings at 3,000 lux or 6,000 lux showed more severe symptoms than those in the dark.

보통답에서 마른 상태의 잔재볏짚이 젖은 상태의 볏짚에서 보다 병원균의 분리빈도가 높았고, 염해답에서는 중간정도 젖은 상태의 볏짚과 완전히 젖은 상태의 볏짚에서 병원균의 분리빈도가 높았으며, 보통답보다는 염해답에서 병원균의 분리빈도가 대체적으로 높았다. 벼깨씨무늬병균은 벼에 포자현탁액을 접종한 후 습실상에서 6시간 유지시키면 침입이 되어 발병이 되었으며, 추청벼에서는 14시간, 대산벼와 Tetep에서는 24시간에 최대 발병율을 나타냈다. 엽령이 많은묘(63일묘)가 엽령이 어린묘(21일-49일묘)보다 병에 대해 감수성이었다. 병반은 품종과 엽위에 관계없이 비교적 고르게 분포되었으며, 대산벼와 추청벼에서 상위에 있는 제 5엽이 하위에 있는 잎들보다 감수성이 높은 경향이었으며, Tetep에서는 뚜렷한 경향이 나타나지 않았으나, 하위엽에서 병반수가 많은 경향이었다. 광의 조사와 발병과의 관계에서는 암처리한 벼가 온실조건 3,000 Lux와 6,000 Lux의 광을 조사한 벼보다 발병정도가 현저히 적은 경향이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arase, S., Zhao, C., Akimitsu, K., Yamamoto, M. and Ichii, M. 2002. A Recessive lesion mimic mutant of rice with elevated resistance to fungal pathogens. J. of General Plant Pathology 68(2): 109
  2. Baba, I., Inada, K. and Tajima, K. 1965. Mineral nutrition and physiological diseases. In: The mineral nutrition of rice plant. Proceedings of Symposium at IRRI, February 1964, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp.173-195
  3. 藤井博. 渡邊康正. 堀野修. 1969. こま葉枯病によゐ穗枯れの發生機構, とくに分生胞子の空中飛散と發病との關係. 日植病報, 35(2): 101
  4. Gray, J. 1995. Characterization of the maize llsl mutation. Maize Genetics Conference Abstracts 37: 75
  5. Kim, C. H. 2003. 2002년 농작물 병해발생개황. 식물병연구 9(1): 10-17
  6. Klomp, A. O. 1977. Early senescence of rice and Drechslera oryzaein the Wageningen Polder, Surinam. WAU dissertation no. 674
  7. Lawrence, E. D. and Richard, S. L. 1994. Brown spot in florida rice. A series of the plant pathology department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 128pp
  8. Oelke, E. A. 1993. Wild rice: Domestication of a native north american genus. In: Janick J. and Simon J.E. (eds.), New crops. Wiley, New York: 235-243
  9. Ohata, K., Kubo, C. and Kitani, K. 1972. Relationship between susceptibility of rice plants to Helminthosporium blight and physiological changes in plant. Bull. Shikoku Agric. Exp. Stn. 25: 1-19
  10. Percich, J. A., Nyvall, R. E, Malvick, D. K. and Kohls, C. L. 1997. Interaction of temperature and moisture on infection of wild rice by Bipolaris oryzae in the growth chamber. Plant Dis. 81: 1193-1195 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.10.1193
  11. Seidel, D. and Herrera, L. 1979. Survival of Cochliobolus miyabeanus in the soil. Wentralbl Bakteriol Naturwiss 134(1): 40-42
  12. Tanaka, A. and Yoshida S. 1970. Nutritional disorders of rice plant in Asia. Int. Rice Res. Inst. Tech. Bull., no. 10
  13. Webster, G. N. and Gummell, P. S. 1992. Conmpendium of rice disease. APS press. 62 pp
  14. 예완해, 남영주, 심홍식, 김용기, 남기웅. 2003. 2003작물보호연구(인쇄중), 농업과학기술원