KIEE International Transactions on Power Engineering

The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (대한전기학회)
권호 표지

The Best Line Choice for Transmission System Expansion Planning on the Side of the Highest Reliability Level

  • Sungrok Kang (Power System Lab., Department of Electrical Engineering Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Trungtinh Tran (Power System Lab., Department of Electrical Engineering Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Jaeseok (Power System Lab., Department of Electrical Engineering Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Junmin Cha (Power System Lab., Department of Electrical Engineering Daejin University) ;
  • Park, Daeseok (Power System Lab., Department of Electrical Engineering University of Technology and Educatio) ;
  • Roy Billinton (Department of Electrical Engineering University of Sasktchewan)
  • Published : 2004.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents a new method for choosing the best line for transmission system expansion planning considering the highest reliability level of the transmission system. Conventional methodologies for transmission system expansion planning have been mainly focused on economics, which is the minimization of construction costs. However, quantitative evaluation of transmission system reliability is important because successful operation and planning of an electric power system under the deregulated electricity market depends on transmission system reliability management. Therefore, it is expected that the development of methodology for choosing the best lines considering the highest transmission system reliability level while taking into account uncertainties of transmission system equipment is useful for the future. The characteristics and effectiveness of the proposed methodology are illustrated by the case study using a MRBTS.

Keywords

References

  1. CEA (March 2000). Industry Restructuring - News & Info. CEA connections online news
  2. IMO (November 1998). Participating in Ontario's New Competitive Electricity Market. Overview Report by IMO
  3. M. Ilic, et al (1998). Power Systems Restructuring; Engineering and Economics, Kluwer Academic
  4. W.S Read, W.K. Newman, I.J. Perez-Arriaga, H.Rudnick, M.R. Gent & A.J. Roman (December 1999). Reliability in the New Market Structure (part1). IEEE Power Engineering Review, p.4-14
  5. W.S Read, W.K. Newman, I.J. Perez-Arriaga, H.Rudnick, M.R. Gent & A.J. Roman (January 2000). Reliability in the New Market Structure(Part2). IEEE Power Engineering Review, p.10-I6
  6. X. Wang. and J.R. McDonald (1994). Modern Power System Planning, McGraw-Hill
  7. Jaeseok Choi, Daeho Do, Seungpil Moon and Roy Billinton (June 1999). Development of a Method for ELDC Construction in a Composite Power System. LESCOPE '99 proceedings, Halifax
  8. Roy Billinton and Wenyuan Li (1994). Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods, Plenum Press
  9. Roy Billinton and A Sankarakrishnan (1995). A Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques for Composite Power System Reliability Assessment. IEEE WESCANEX '95 proceedings, pp.145-I50
  10. Roy Billinton and Ronald N. Allan (1996). Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, Second Edition, Plenum Presss
  11. Roy Billinton and W. Zhang (1996). Enhanced Adequacy Equivalent for Composite Power System Reliability Evaluation. IEE, Proc.-GTD 143(5), pp. 420-426
  12. L. Chen, H. Suwa and J. Toyoda (Feb. 1991). Power Arrival Evaluation of Bulk System Including Network Constraints Based on Linear Programming Approach. IEEE Trans., Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 37-42
  13. J. Toyoda, L. Chen, T.Minakawa and T. Yamada (1991). New Indices and Computational Techniques for Composite System Reliability Evaluation. Cigre Symposium, Montreal, A1-01
  14. S. Niioka, R. Yokoyama K. Okada & H. Asano (January 2000). Impact Evaluation of Reliability Management and Operation under the Deregulated Electric Power Market. IEEE PES WM2000, Singapore