DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quantitative Comparisons of Soil Carbon and Nutrient Storage in Larix leptolepis, Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigitaeda Plantations

  • Kim, Choonsig (Department of Forest Resources, Jinju National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Seo (Department of Forest Resources, Jinju National University)
  • Published : 2004.04.01

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate soil carbon and nutrient storage of three adjacent coniferous plantations (Larix leptolepis, Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigitaeda) growing on a similar site with a same planting age (42-year old) in the Sambong Exhibition Forests, Hamyang-gun, Gyungsangnam-do. The soil carbon concentration among three plantations was not significantly different in 0∼10cm soil depth, but other two depths (10∼20cm and 20∼30cm) showed higher carbon concentration in P. densiflora plantation than the other two plantations. The exchangeable cation concentrations (Ca and Mg) in 0∼10cm depth were significantly lower in L. leptolepis plantation than in the other two plantations, while nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations were not significantly different among three plantations except for nitrogen at 10∼20cm depth in P. rigitaeda plantation. Soil carbon storage in 0∼20cm depth of three plantations was unaffected by the stand types. Soil nutrient storage was not significantly different at each depth except for nitrogen storage at 10∼20cm depth in P. rigitaeda plantation because of the variation of bulk density and coarse fragment. This result demonstrates that soil carbon and nutrient concentrations among the plantations on a similar soil condition can be altered significantly by tree species effects over 40 years after plantation establishment.

Keywords

References

  1. Can. J. For. Res. v.22 Carbon storage in Lake States aspen ecosystems Alban,D.H.;D.A.Perala https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-146
  2. For. Ecol. Manage. v.133 Impacts of forest management on northern forest soils Ballard,T.M. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00296-0
  3. Ecol. Bull. v.44 The influence of tree species on a acid deposition, proton budgets and element fluxes in south Swedish forest ecosystems Bergkvist,B.;L.Folkeson
  4. Biogeochemistry v.43 Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interaction Binkley,D.;C.Giardina
  5. For. Ecol. Manage. v.186 Change in soil carbon and nutrient storage after human disturbance of a primary Korean pine forest in northeast China Chen,X.;B.L.Li. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00258-5
  6. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. v.63 Soil carbon and nutrients in a coastal Oregon Douglas-fir plantation with red alder Cromack,K.Jr.;R.E.Miller;O.T.helgerson;R.B.Smith;H.W.Anderson https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300010034x
  7. For. Ecol. Manage. v.177 Carbon storage along a stand development sequence in a New Zealand Nothofagus forest Davis,M.R.;R.B.Allen;P.W.Clinton https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00333-X
  8. Can. J. Soil Sci. v.73 Estimating total soil mass, nutrient content and trace metals in soils under a low elevation spruce-fir forest Fernandez,I.J.;L.E.Rustad;G.B.Lawrence https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss93-034
  9. Can. J. Soil Sci. v.74 Forest floor and soil nutrient status under Norway spruce and red pine in a plantation in southern Quebec Fyles,J.W.;B.Cote https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss94-052
  10. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. v.52 Estimating soil nitrogen and carbon pools in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem Huntington,T.G.;D.F.Ryan;S.P.Hamburg https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200040049x
  11. J. Kor. For. Soc. v.88 Aboveground nutrient distribution in pitch pine (Pinus rigida) and Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations Kim,C.
  12. J. Kor. For. Soc. v.90 Change of aboveground carbon storage in Pinus rigida stand in Gwangnung, Gyunggi-do, Korea Kim,C.;J.H.Jeong
  13. FRI. J. For. Sci. v.57 Soil organic carbon content in forest soils of Korea Jeong,J.H.;C.Kim;W.K.Lee
  14. USDA-USFS Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-171 Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry: guideline for professional and volunteer tree planters McPherson,E.G.;J.R.Simpson
  15. Methods of soil chemical and plant analysis National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology
  16. SAS/STAT User's Guide(Version 6)(4th ed.) v.2 SAS Institute Inc.
  17. Ann. Sci. For. v.54 Soil nitrogen mineralization in adjacent stands of larch, pine and oak in central Korea Son,Y.;I.K.Lee https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19970101
  18. For. Ecol. Manage. v.53 Nitrogen and phosphorus distribution for five plantation species in southwestern Wisconsin Son,Y.;S.T.Gower https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90042-8
  19. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. v.22 A comparison of some methods for soil organic carbon determination Soon,Y.K.;S.Abboud https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629109368465
  20. Land-use Change and Forestry Watson,R.T.;I.R.Novel;B.Bolin;N.H.Ravindranath;D.J.Verardo;D.J.Dokken
  21. For. Ecol. Manage. v.138 Elemental storage of forest soil from local to global scales Zinke,P.J.;A.G.Stangenberger https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00394-7

Cited by

  1. stand vol.10, pp.4, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1080/17386357.2006.9647301
  2. Estimation of carbon storage, carbon inputs, and soil CO2 efflux of alder plantations on granite soil in central Korea: comparison with Japanese larch plantation vol.5, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-008-0056-1