한국지진공학회논문집 (Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)

  • 제8권1호
  • /
  • Pages.77-86
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1226-525X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-1099(eISSN)
한국지진공학회 (Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

형상기억합금을 이용한 다경간 연속 강교량의 지진보호

Seismic Protection for Multiple Span Continuous Steel Bridges using Shape Memory Alloy-Restrainer-Dampers

  • 발행 : 2004.02.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문은 강교좌장치를 가지고 있는 연속 강교량을 지진으로부터 보호하기 위해서 형상기억합금을 이용한 장치를 제안했다. 예로 사용하고 있는 연속 강교량은 고정단을 가진 교각에 지진하중이 집중하고 상당히 큰 상부구조의 중량으로 인하여 교각에 손상을 입기 쉽고 상판의 교대에 대한 충돌로 교대의 수동변위가 크게 나타날 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 두 가지 종류의 restrainer-damper가 제안되었으며 지진해석을 통해서 효과를 검증하였다. 또한 미주에서 일반적으로 사용되고 있는 강재 케이블의 restraoiner와 성능을 비교하였다.

This paper introduces a shape memory alloy-restrainer-damper(SMA-RD) to protect multiple span continuous steel bridges from seismic loads. The type of bridges has only one fixed bearing condition on a pier and expansion bearings are located on the other piers and abutments. Due to this state and a big mass of the deck, these bridges are usually very vulnerable to column's damage on which fixed bearings are located and large deformation of abutments in passive action. Two types of SMA-RDs are developed, and their effect is inspected for protecting the bridges through seismic analyses. Conventional steel restrainer cables are also used to reduce the seismic vulnerability of the bridge and the results are compared to those of the SMA-RDs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, E., "Seismic Analysis and Retrofit of Mid-America Bridges,: Doctoral Thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2002.
  2. Jennings, P. C. Engineering Seismology, Reprinted From Earthquakes: Observation, Theory, and Interpretation, 1983.
  3. Randall, M., J. Saiidi, M., S., Maragakis E., M., and Isakovic, T. "Restrainer Design Procedures for Multi-Span Simply Supported Bridges," Technical Report MCEER-99-0011, 1999.
  4. DesRoches, R. and Fenves, G. L. "New Design and Analysis Procedures for Intermediate Hinges in Multiple-Frames Bridges," Report No. UCB/EERC-97/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA., 1997. 12.
  5. Saiidi, M., Maragakis, E., and O'Connor, D. "Seismic Performance of the Ma-drone Bridge During the 1989 Loma Preita Earthquake," Structural Engineering Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1995, pp. 219-230.
  6. Lam, I. P., "Soil-Structure Interaction Related to Piles and Footings," A Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Seismic Design of Bridges, Queen-sown, News Zealang, 1994.
  7. Dolce, M., Donatello, C., and Marnetto, R., "Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 29, 2000, pp. 945-968. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200007)29:7<945::AID-EQE958>3.0.CO;2-#
  8. DesRoches, R. and Delemont, M. "Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys," Engineering Structures, Vol. 24, 2002, pp. 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00098-0
  9. Wilde, K., Gardoni, P., and Fujino, Y. "Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges," Engineering Structures, Vol. 22, 2000, pp. 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00097-2
  10. Duerig, T. W., Melton, K. N., Stockel, D., and Wayman, C. M., Engineering aspects of shape memory alloys, London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990.
  11. Prakash, V., Powell, G. H., Campbell, S. D., and Filippou, F. C. DRAIN-2DX User Guide, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, 1992.
  12. Mander, J. B., Kim, D. K., Chen, S. S., and Premus, G. J. "Response of Steel Bridge Bearings to the Reversed Cyclic Loading," Technical Report NCEER 96-0014, Buffalo, NY, 1996.
  13. Mander, J. B and Priestley, M. J. N., "Observed Stress-Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 114, No. 8, 1988. 8, pp. 1827-1849. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1827)