오염토양의 효율적 조사기법과 측정불확도의 평가방법

Cost-effective Investigation on Contaminated Land and Assessment of Measurement Uncertainty

  • 발행 : 2004.02.01

초록

The concectration and distribution of contaminants obtained from a contaminated land investigation or an environmental geochemistry survey constitutes the basis of a decision-making process on environmental policies or of scientific researches. As the quality of data determines the reliability of the result, the investigation plan should be adjusted according to the purpose of the investigation. In general, the effort to improve the data quality had been focused mainly on the QA/QC procedures in laboratories. The rapid progress of analytical instrument has also contributed toward improving the analytical precision to a sacrificable degree. Nevertheless, in many cases, it is not the analytical precision that needs improvement for the better precision of overall measurement process: it is rather during the sampling process in the field that is responsible for the poor precision. To assess the data quality on a measured value, ISO recommends to provide information on "measurement uncertainty" along with the measured value. The measurement uncertainty in an environmental measurement context can be explained as the statistical number that expresses the degree of the uncertainty stemming from the sampling and analytical procedures. There is a cost involved in order to improve the precision of sampling and analytical methods so as to decrease the degree of measurement uncertainty. The economical point of compromise in an investigation planning can be achieved when the allowable degree of uncertainty has been set before-hand. The investigation can then be planned accordingly not to exceed the uncertainty limit. Furthermore, if the measurement uncertainty estimated from the preliminary investigation can be separated into sampling and analytical uncertainties, it can be used as a criterion where the resources for the investigation should be allotted cost-effectively to reinforce the weakest link of the whole investigation process. This paper aims to present a method of estimating the level of measurement uncertainty of a measured contamination concentration at a site used as an example and to show how the estimated uncertainty can be applied to serve the particular purpose of an investigation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Analyst v.114 Robust statistics-how not to reject outliers Part 1. Basic concepts AMC https://doi.org/10.1039/an9891401693
  2. Analyst v.120 Uncertainty of measurements: Implications of its use in analytical science AMC https://doi.org/10.1039/an9952002303
  3. Sampling techniques. (3rd ed.) Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics Cochran,W.G.
  4. Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. (2nd ed.) Eurachem;S.L.R.Ellison(ed.);M.rosslein(ed.);A.Williams(ed.)
  5. Economic Geology v.64 The Determination of Sampling and Analytical Errors in Exploration Geochemistry Garrett,R. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.64.5.568
  6. Sampling of particulate materials: Theory and practice Gy,P.
  7. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. (1st ed.) ISO
  8. Analyst v.126 Modelling measurement uncertainty as a function of concentration: an example from a contaminated land investigation Lee,J.C.;Ramsey,M.H. https://doi.org/10.1039/b104946c
  9. PhD Thesis. Department of Environmental Science and Technology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Measurement uncertainty in contaminated land investigations related to analyte concentration and cost Lee,J.C.
  10. Korea Society of Economic and Environmental Geology v.36 no.3 Optimization of contaminated land investigation based on different fitness-for-purpose criteria Lee,J.C.;Ramsey,M.H.
  11. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper Part A Theory of error in geochemical data Miesch,A.T.
  12. Statisitcs for analytical chemistry. (3rd ed.) Miller,J.C.;Miller,J.N.
  13. Pierre Gy's sampling theory and sampling practice: heterogeneity, sampling correctness and statistical process. (2ed) Pitard,F.F.
  14. J. of Geochemical Exploration v.44 Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of variance Ramsey,M.H.;Thompson,M.;Hale,M. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(92)90046-B
  15. Analyst v.120 Estimation of sampling bias between different sampling protocols on contaminated land Ramsey,M.H.;Argyraki,A.Thompson,M. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9952001353
  16. Analyst v.122 no.11 Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling: Implications for the objectives of geoanalysis Ramsey,M.H. https://doi.org/10.1039/a704995a
  17. Science of the Total Environment v.198 no.3 Estimation of measurement uncertainty from field sampling: Implications for the classification of contaminated land Ramsey,M.H.;Argyraki,A. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(97)05456-9
  18. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry v.13 no.2 Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources Ramsey,M.H. https://doi.org/10.1039/a706815h
  19. Analyst v.113 Variation of precision with concentration in an analytical system Thompson,M. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9881301579
  20. Analyst v.121 no.3 What exactly is fitness for purpose in analytical measurement? Thompson,M.;Fearn,T. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9962100275
  21. 행정간행물등록번호 11-1480000-000669-01 2002년도 토양 측정망 및 실태조사 결과 환경부