Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제29권3호
  • /
  • Pages.205-211
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

법랑질 접착에 대한 습윤 효과

EFFECT OF WETNESS ON THE ENAMEL BONDING

  • 고근호 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 진철희 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 유상훈 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김종욱 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 박병철 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 기영재 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 최희영 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김종진 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Ko, Keun-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jin, Cheul-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Yoo, Sang-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Uk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Byung-Cheul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Ki, Young-Jae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Choi, Hee-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 발행 : 2004.05.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study evaluated the microleakage and interfacial gap between enamel and composite resin under the dry and wet condition of the enamel surface. V shaped class 5 cavities were prepared on the occlusal portion of extracted human molars. Samples were divided into three groups：D group (air dry for 10-15s), BD group (blot dry with moist cotton pellet), and DR group (air dry for 10-15s and rewet with Aqua-Prep F for 20s), Cavities were filled using Aelitefil composite resin after applied One-Step. Microleakage was tested by 2% methylene blue dye solution and the data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test. Also Enamel-resin interface was observed under SEM. Group BD showed statistically lower microleakage than group D (p < 0.05). but there was no statistically significant difference between group BD and DR (p > 0.05). At the enamel-resin interface, group D showed the gap of $2{\;}{\mu}m$ thickness, but group BD and DR showed close adaptation. In conclusion, the use of blot dry and rewetting agent (Aqua-Prep F) resulted in decreased microleakage and improved adhesion between enamel and resin when using One-Step.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Amaral CM, Hara AT. Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues Jr AL. Microleakage of hydrophilic systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 14(1):31 34, 2001
  2. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechets P, Vanherle G. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent 14(3):170 176, 2001
  3. Franchi M, Breschi L. Effects of acid etching solutions on human enamel and dentin. Quintessence Int 26: 431 435, 1995
  4. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 23(1):39 41. 1992
  5. Moll K, Gartner T, Haller B. Effect of moist bonding on composite/enamel bond strength. Am J Dent 15(2):85 70, 2002
  6. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R. Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int 32:385 390, 2001
  7. Swift EJ. Enamel and dentin bonding. J Esthet Dent 12(3):119 201, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00210.x
  8. Van Meerbeek B. De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, La mbrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28(3):215 235, 2003
  9. Pashley DH, Ciucci B, Sano H, Horner JA. Perneability of dentin to adhesive agents Quintessence Int 24: 618 631, 1993
  10. Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent 7(3): 144 148, 1994
  11. Tay FR. Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum of acid conditioned dentin following the application of a water based adhesive. Dent Mater 14:329 338, 1998 Dent Mater https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00046-3
  12. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR. Tagami J, Pashley DH. Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 13(6):354 328, 2000
  13. Gallo JR, Henderson M, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength to moist and dry dentin of four dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 13(5):267 270, 2000
  14. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Agee KA, Lee KW. Solvation of dried dentin matrix by water and other polar solvents. Am J Dent 15:97 102, 2002
  15. Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Tensile bond strength of filled and unfilled adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 3(2);73 74, 2000
  16. Gwinnett AJ. Moist vs. dry dentin: Its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 5:127 129, 1992
  17. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 9:161 166, 1996
  18. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Rosa BT. Effects of different re wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esthet Dent 12(2):85 96, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00205.x
  19. Perdigao J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 15:282 295, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00049-4
  20. Pilo R, Cardash HS, Oz Ari B, Ben Amar A. Effect of preliminary treatment of the dentin surface on the shear bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Oper Dent 26:569 575, 2001
  21. Kanca, J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel. Quintessence Int 23(9):625 627, 1992
  22. Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent 25:51 56, 2000
  23. Goldan VV, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. lnterfacial ultra structure of the enamel/dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 11:13 16,1998
  24. Buonocore MG. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 28:849 853, 1955
  25. Abdalla Al, Garcia Godoy F. Morphological characterization of single bottle adhesives and vital dentin interface. Am J Dent 15(1):31 34, 2002
  26. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV. Effecct of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of class V composite restorations: Three year Results. Oper Dent 28(5):482 487, 2003
  27. Barghi N, Knight GT, Berry TG. Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel: A clinical study. Oper Dent 16:130 135, 1991
  28. Knight GT, Berry TG, Barghi N, Burns TR. Effects of two methods of moisture control on marginal microl eakage between resin composite and etched enamel: a clinical study. Int J Prothod 6(5):475 479, 1993
  29. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA. Effect of a re wetting agent on the performance of acetone based dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 11:207 213, 1999
  30. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Ultrastructure of the resin dentin interface following reversible and irreversible rewetting. Am J Dent 10(2):77 82, 1997
  31. Swift EJ. Resin desensitizers. J Esthet Dent 11(6):289 290, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00412.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of an intermediate bonding resin and flowable resin on the compatibility of two-step total etching adhesives with a self-curing composite resin vol.34, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.5.397