Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

5급 와동에서의 수종 접착 시스템의 결합강도에 관한 비교연구

  • Kwon, Jung-Mi (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Kyung-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University)
  • 권정미 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최경규 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박상진 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2004.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

이 연구는 발거 소구치에서 5급 와동을 형성하여 접착 시스템 및 와동 위치에 따른 상아질에 대한 접착시스템의 미세 인장결합강도의 차이를 비교, 연구하였다. 접착방법은 resin-modified glass ionomer(Gl), compomer(부식여부에 따라 DE 및 DN군으로 분류), 그리고 상아질 접착제인 Single Bond(SB) 및 Cleayfil SE Bond(SE)와 복합레진(Clearfil AP-X)을 사용한 5개의 실험군으로 분류하였다. 소구치 협측 치경부에 wedge형태의 와동을 형성하고 5종의 접착 시스템을 제조자의 지시에 따라 적용, 충전하여 시편을 제작하여 미세인장결합강도를 측정하고, One-way ANOVA / Duncan's test로 통계분석하였다. SEM 검사는 미세인장결합강도의 시편제작과 동일한 방법으로 시편을 제작한 후 관찰하였다. 실험 결과, 상아질 접착제 및 복합레진(SB, SE)의 미세인장결합강도가 GI보다 높게 나타났고(p<0.05), 치은측이 교합측보다 더 낮게 나타났으며, CI, DE, SE에서 유의성 있게 낮게 나타났다(p<0.05). Compomer에서 conditioning 여부(DN, DE)에 따른 변화는 치은측에서만 유의차 있는 것으로 나타났다. SEM 관찰에서, 교합측의 상아세관은 결합 계면과 평행하게 주행하였고, 치은측에서는 결합계면에 수직으로 주행하는 것으로 관찰되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Antonuccii JM, McKinney JE, Stanabury JW. Resin modified glass ionomer cement. US patent application, 160856, 1988
  2. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin modified glass ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 27:203 209, 1996
  3. Van Dijken JW. 3 year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin modified glass ionmer and a resin composite in Class III restoration. Am J Dent 9:195 198, 1996
  4. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 34:849 853, 1955 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  5. Nakabayashi N. Resin reinforced dentin due to infiltration of monomers into the dentin at the adhesive interface. J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devic 1:78 81, 1982
  6. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhension. J Dent 25:355 372, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00057-7
  7. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao P, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:1 20. 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00070-X
  8. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N. Bonding durability of photocured phenyl P in TEGDMA to smear layer retained dentin. Quintessence Int 24:335 342, 1993
  9. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75:1706 1715, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750091401
  10. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185 194, 1998
  11. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl P self etching primer, J Dent Res 73:1212 1220, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061301
  12. Yoshiyama M, Sano H. Ebisu S, Tagami J, Cucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 75:1404 1413. 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750061201
  13. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Homer JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent 24:435 442, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00102-6
  14. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of micro tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236 240 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  15. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries effected dentin using adhesives. J Dent Res 74:1679 1688, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740100901
  16. Pereira PNR. Okuda M, Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Boschian L, Burrow M, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Tagami T. Effect of water and regional difference on dentin bond strength. J Dent Res 76:20, Abstract 56, 1997
  17. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Pashley DH. Effect of C factor and depth on bonding strength to dentin. J Dent Res 76:39 Abstract 201, 1997
  18. Sano B. Shono T. Sonoda H. Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength Evaluation of a micro tensile bond test. Dent Mater 13:236 240, 1994
  19. Gwinnett AJ. Kanca J 3rd Interfacial morphology of ressin composit and shiny erosion，lesions. Am J Dent 5:315 317, 1992
  20. Sano H. Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage : leakage with in the hybrid layer, Oper Dent 20:18 25, 1995
  21. Wang T, Nakabayashi N. Effect of 2 (methacryloxy) ethyl phenyl hydrogen phosphate on adhesion to dentin. J Dent Res 70:59 66, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700011001
  22. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure A comparison of glass ionomer and composite resin systems. J Esthet Dent 6:227 244, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00864.x
  23. Pereira PNR, Yamada T, Tei R, Tagarηi J. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of an improved resin modified glass ionimer cement. Am J Dent 10: 128 132. 1997
  24. Valeria VG. Daniel B, Karl John S. Enamel and dentin shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin baced adhesives. J Dent 26:497 503, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00010-4
  25. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Interfacial characteristics of resin modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 77:1749 59, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770091101
  26. Yip HK, Smales RJ. Fluoride release from a polyacid modified resin cmposite and 3 resin modified glasss ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 31:261 266, 2000
  27. Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou Antoniades M, Theodoridou Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent 25:20 25, 2000
  28. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubular orientation on the bond strength between resin and dentin. J Dent 27: 265 274, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00060-8
  29. Non Rinse Conditioner(NRC). Dentsply Technical Manual, Konstanz, Germany, 1998
  30. Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H. Tagami J. Effect of dentin Primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 24:81 88, 1994
  31. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Sano H. Tagami J. Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 26:27 35, 2001
  32. Perdigao J, May Jr KN, Wilder Jr AD, Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid laayer, Oper Dent 25: 186 194, 2000
  33. Tanumihaja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 16:180 187, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00007-5
  34. Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress absorbing layer in resin bonding. Quintessence Int 26:733 738, 1995
  35. Uno S, Finger WJ. Effect of acidic con야tioners on dentin demineralization and dimension of hybrid layers. J Dent 26:211 216, 1996
  36. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 73:1205 1211, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061201
  37. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G. Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M. Lambrechts P. Assessment by nano indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72:1434 1442, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720101401
  38. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117 125, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8