References
- AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
- Bertram, H. L., E. J. Van Weerden and J. B. Schutte. 1991. DLmethionine and DL-methionine hydroxy analogue compared: There is a difference in biological activity in broiler diets. Misset World Poultry vol. 7:2, 13, 15.
- Brennan, J. J. 1998. Efficacy of liquid MHA-FA as compared to DL-methionine on performance and carcass quality of broiler chickens. Project No. 40351, Shur-Gain Agresearch, Canada (Source: Feed back facts & figures, Feed additives, Poultry 7, Degussa-Huls).
- Christensen, A. C. and J. O. Anderson. 1980. Factors affecting efficacy of methionine hydroxy analogue for chick fed practical diets. Poult. Sci. 59:2485-2491.
- Danner, E. E. and W. Bessei. 2002. Effectiveness of liquid DLmethionine hydroxy analogue-free acid (DL-MHA-FA) compared to DL-methionine on performance of laying hens. Arch. Geflugelk 66:(3),97-101.
- Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
- Greger, G. R., J. R. Couch and H. L. Ernst. 1968. Methionine hydroxy analogue and L-methionine in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 47:229-232.
- Harms, R. H. and R. E. Buresh. 1985. Recent poult studies comparing methionine availability from various sources, In: Proceedings Florida Nutrition Conference, pp. 41-45 (Gainesville, University of Florida).
- Harvey, W. R. 1975. Least square analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. Agric Research Service, United State, Deptt. of Agriculture.
- Huyghebaert, G. and P. J. W. Van Schagen. 1989. Relative biopotency of methionine sources for broilers, as measured by means of a multi-exponential regression model, In: IRTA,Barcelona, Proceedings 7th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, loret de Mar, Spain.
- Kirchgessner, M. and H. Steinhart. 1984. Biological effectiveness of DL-methionine-Na and DL-2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutyric acid with broilers. Archiv fiir Gefliigelkunde, 48:45-51.
- Larbier, M. 1988. A comparative study on the digestibility of methionine hydroxy analogue (M.H.A.) and of DL-methionine on adult cocks, in: (Ed. Y. Yamada) Proceedings XVIII World’s Poultry Congress, September 4-9, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 823-825 (Japanese Poultry Science Association).
- Lemme, A., D. Hoehler, J. J. Brennan and P. F. Mannion. 2002.Relative Effectiveness of Methionine Hydroxy Analog Compared to DL-methionine in Broilers Chickens. Poult. Sci.81:838-845. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.838
- Llames, C. R. and J. Fontaine. 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: Collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. Int. 77:1362-1402.
- Lu, J. J., C. W. Huang and R. G. R. Chou. 2003. The effects of DLMethionine hydroxyl analogue on growth performance, contents of serum amino acids and activities of digestive proteases in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:714-718. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.714
- Mannion, P. F. 1999. A comparison of the bioefficacy of diluted DL-methionine (65%) or liquid MHA-FA as compared to pure DL-methionine in broiler chicks. Report No. 03.53.99002, Queensland Poultry Research and Development Centre, Australia. (Source: Feed back facts & figures, Feed additives, Poultry 10, Degussa-Huls).
- Naumann, C., R. Bassler, R Seibold and C. Barth. 1997. Methodenbuch Band III. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
- Noll, S. L., P. E. Waibel, R. D. Cook and J. A. Witmer. 1984. Biopotency of methionine sources for young turkeys. Poult. Sci. 63:2458-2470.
- Reid, B. L., A. Madrid and P. M. Maiorino. 1982. Relative biopotency of three methionine sources for laying hens. Poult. Sci. 61:726-730.
- Romoser, G. L., P. L. Wright and R. B. Grainger. 1976. An evaluation of the L-methionine activity of the hydroxy analogue of methionine. Poult. Sci. 55:1099-1103.
- Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th Ed. Iowa State University press, Ames, Iowa.
- Thomas, O. P., S. D. Crissey, E. H. Bossard and M. B. Soverns. 1983. An evaluation of DL-methionine and related compounds. Proceedings Maryland Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufactureres, 26-31.
- Thomas, O. P., C. Tamplin, S. D. Crissey, E. H. Bossard and A. Zuckerman. 1991. An evaluation of methionine hydroxy analog free acid using a non linear(exponential) bioassay. Poult. Sci. 70:605-610.
- Uzu, G. 1986. Nutritional efficacy of DL-methionine, Dmethionine and DL-methionine hydroxy analogue acid in a corn soybean meal lupin diet, in: (M. Larbie) Proceedings 7th European Poultry Conference, August 24-28, Paris, France, pp. 612-615 (French Branch of WPSA).
- Van Weerden, E. J., H. L. Bertram and J. B. Schutte. 1982. Comparison of DL-methionine, DL-methionine-Na, DLmethionine hydroxy analogue-Ca, and DL-methionine hydroxy analogue free acid in broilers by using a crystalline amino acid diet. Poult. Sci. 61:1125-1130.
- Van Weerden, E. J., J. B Schutte and H. L. Bertram. 1983. DLmethionine and DL-methionine hydroxy free acid in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 62:1269-1274.
- Waldroup, P. W., C. J. Mabray, J. R. Blackman, P. J. Slagter, R. J. Short and Z. R. Johnson. 1981. Effectiveness of the free acid of methionine hydroxy analogue as a methionine supplement in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 60:438-443.
Cited by
- Effect of methionine hydroxy analog-free acid on growth performance and chemical composition of liver of broiler chicks fed a corn-soybean based diet from 0 to 6 weeks of age vol.77, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00325.x
- Dietary methionine requirement of Jing Brown layer hens from 9 to 17 weeks of age vol.101, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12525
- Effects of Adequate or Marginal Excess of Dietary Methionine Hydroxy Analogue Free Acid on Growth Performance, Edible Meat Yields and Inflammatory Response in Female Broiler Chickens vol.44, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.44.265
- Assessment of Meat Quality and Shelf Life from Broilers Fed with Different Sources and Concentrations of Methionine vol.2019, pp.1745-4557, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6182580
- Comparative Studies on the Relative Efficacy of DL-methionine and Liquid Methionine Hydroxy Analogue in Growing Pigs vol.18, pp.7, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.1003
- The Relative Effectiveness of Liquid Methionine Hydroxy Analogue Compared to DL-methionine in Broilers vol.19, pp.7, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1026
- Effect of Supplementing 2-Hydroxy-4-(Methylthio) Butanoic Acid and DL-methionine in Corn-soybean-cottonseed Meal Diets on Growth Performance and Carcass Quality of Broilers vol.19, pp.8, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1197
- Relative Performance and Immune Response in White Leghorn Layers Fed Liquid DL-methionine Hydroxy Analogue and DL-methionine vol.20, pp.6, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.948
- Effect of Methionine Source and Dietary Crude Protein Level on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Nutrient Retention in Chinese Color-feathered Chicks vol.20, pp.6, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.962
- Biological Effectiveness of Methionine Hydroxy-analogue Calcium Salt in Relation to DL-Methionine in Broiler Chickens vol.21, pp.10, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.80201
- Effects of DL-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid on broilers at different dietary inclusion rates vol.56, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2015.1021296
- Effects of different methionine sources on growth performance, meat yield and blood characteristics in broiler chickens vol.47, pp.1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1617719
- Methionine nutrition in swine and related monogastric animals: Beyond protein biosynthesis vol.268, pp.None, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114608
- Paternal Dietary Methionine Supplementation Improves Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Chicken Progeny vol.11, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020325