이식면역학의 역사적 고찰

Transplantation Immunology from the Historical Perspective

  • 박정규 (서울대학교 의과대학 미생물학교실, 종양면역의과학센터, 의학연구원 장기이식연구소, 바이오이종장기이식연구센터)
  • Park, Chung-Gyu (Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tumor Immunity Medical Research Center, Seoul NationalUniversity College of Medicine, The Transplantation Research Institute and Xenotransplantation ResearchCenter, SNUMRC)
  • 발행 : 2004.03.31

초록

Transplantation would be the only way to cure the end-stage organ failure involving heart, lung, liver, kidney and pancreas. The replacement of the parts of the body damaged to lose its function or lost to trauma must be a dream of human-being. Human history is replete with chimeras, from sphinxes to mermaids, making one wonder if the ancients might actually have dreamed of what now is called 'xenotransplantation'. In the 20th century, the transplantation of organs and tissues to cure disease has become a clinical reality. The development in the fields of surgical techniques, physiology and immunology attributed to the successful transplantation in human. In the center of the successful transplantation lies the progress in understanding the cellular and molecular biology of immune system which led to the development of immunosuppressive drugs and the invention of the concept of immunological tolerance. The mandatory side effects of immunosuppressive drugs including infection and cancer forced us to search alternative approaches along with the development of new immunosuppressive agents. Among the alternative approaches, the induction of a state of immunologic tolerance would be the most promising and the most generic applicability as a future therapy. Recent reports documenting long-term graft survival without immunosuppression suggest that tolerance-based therapies may become a clinical reality. Last year, we saw the epoch making success of overcoming hyperacute rejection in porcine to primate xenotransplantation which will lead porcine to human xenotransplantation to clinical reality. In this review, I dare to summarize the development of transplantation immunology from the perspective of history.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brent L: A History of Transplantation Immunology. San Diego, Academic Press, 1997
  2. Auchincloss HS, Sachs, DH: Transplantation Immunology, in Fundamental Immunology, vol 5th. Edited by William P. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 2003
  3. Carrel A: Landmark article, Nov 14, 1908: Results of the transplantation of blood vessels, organs and limbs. By Alexis Carrel. Jama 250;944-953, 1983
  4. Billingham RE: Transplantation: Past, Present and Future. J Invest Dermatol 41;165-180, 1963
  5. Hume DM, Merrill JP, Miller BF, Thorn GW: Experiences with renal homotransplantation in the human: report of nine cases. J Clin Invest 34;327-382, 1955
  6. Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB, Sparrow EM: Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. I. The survival times of skin homografts exchanged between members of different inbred strains of mice. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 143;43-58, 1954
  7. Medawar P: Second study of behaviour and fate of skin homografts in rabbits. J Anat 79;157, 1945
  8. Mitchison NA: Passive transfer of transplantation immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 142;72-87, 1954
  9. Owen R: Immunogenetic consequences of vascular anastomoses between bovine twins. Science 102;400-401, 1945
  10. Burnet FF, F: The production of antibodies. London, Macmillan & Co. Ltd, 1949
  11. Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB: Activity acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature 172;603-606, 1953
  12. Main JM, Prehn RT: Successful skin homografts after the administration of high dosage X radiation and homologous bone marrow. J Natl Cancer Inst 15;1023-1029, 1955
  13. Gatti RA, Meuwissen HJ, Allen HD, Hong R, Good RA:Immunological reconstitution of sex-linked lymphopenic immunological deficiency. Lancet 2;1366-1369, 1968
  14. Schwartz R, Dameshek W: Drug-induced immunological tolerance. Nature 183;1682-1683, 1959
  15. Murray JE, Merrill JP, Harrison JH, Wilson RE, Dammin GJ:Prolonged survival of human-kidney homografts by immunosuppressive drug therapy. N Engl J Med 268;1315-1323, 1963 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196306132682401
  16. Snell G: Methods for the study of histocompatibility genes. J Genet 49;87-108, 1948
  17. Van Rood JJ, Eernisse JG, Van Leeuwen A: Leucocyte antibodies in sera from pregnant women. Nature 181;1735-1736, 1958
  18. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Porter KA, Iwasaki Y, Cerilli GJ:The use of heterologous antilymphoid agents in canine renal and liver homotransplantation and in human renal homotransplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 124;301-308, 1967
  19. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Porter KA, Brettschneider L: Homotransplantation of the liver. Transplantation 5;Suppl:790-803, 1967
  20. Hiestand PC, Gunn HC, Gale JM, Ryffel B, Borel JF: Comparison of the pharmacological profiles of cyclosporine, (Nva2)-cyclosporine and (Val2) dihydro-cyclosporine. Immunology 55;249-255, 1985
  21. Goto Y, Tanabe K, Tokumoto T, Kondo T, Ishikawa N, Toma H: Outcome of tacrolimus-treated renal transplantation from elderly donors. Transplant Proc 32;1723-1725, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(00)01399-3
  22. Auchincloss H, Jr.: In search of the elusive Holy Grail: the mechanisms and prospects for achieving clinical transplantation tolerance. Am J Transplant 1;6-12, 2001
  23. Blaha P, Bigenzahn S, Koporc Z, Schmid M, Langer F, Selzer E, Bergmeister H, Wrba F, Kurtz J, Kiss C, Roth E, Muehlbacher F, Sykes M, Wekerle T: The influence of immunosuppressive drugs on tolerance induction through bone marrow transplantation with costimulation blockade. Blood 101;2886-2893, 2003