Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rapid Screening of Salmonella spp. Using PBM BioSignTM Salmonella Test and Evaluation of the PBMS Test

  • Lim, J.Y. (Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology Seoul National University) ;
  • Kwon, N.H. (Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, J.M. (Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, W.K. (Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, K.T. (Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology Seoul National University) ;
  • Hong, S.K. (Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Y.H. (Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2004.02.04
  • Accepted : 2004.07.21
  • Published : 2004.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The PBM ${BioSign}^{TM}$ Salmonella (PBMS) test kit based on an mmunochromatographic method was evaluated for the screening of Salmonella spp. in pure cultures, and 80, 15, and 10 artificially and naturally contaminated, and negative controlled food samples, respectively. The PBMS test involves presumptive qualitative procedures, detecting the presence of Salmonella spp. in foods within 26 h total testing period and allowing the user to release negative products 70 h earlier than the conventional methods. The PBMS test using Buffered Peptone Water and Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth was evaluated for 10 different food types for various Salmonella spp. It showed detection limits of 1 to 25 colony forming units (CFU)/25 g. No cross-reaction was observed, particularly to other gramnegative bacteria. These results indicate the PBMS test is a rapid and inexpensive procedure for the screening of Salmonella spp. present at low concentrations (1 to 25 CFU/25 g) in foods.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J. S., J. R. Byun and Y. H. Yoon. 2003. In vivo antagonistic effect of Lactobacillus helveticus CU 631 against Salmonella enteritidis KU101 infection. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:430-434.
  2. Bird, C. B., R. L. Miller and B. M. Miller. 1999. Reveal for Salmonella test system. J. AOAC Int. 82(3):625-633.
  3. Blackburn, C. W. 1993. Rapid and alternative methods for the detection of Salmonella in foods. J. Appl. Bact. 75:199-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02767.x
  4. Doyle, M. P., L. R. Beuchat and T. J. Montville. 1997. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers. ASM press, Washington DC.
  5. Duncanson, P., D. R. Wareing and O. Jones. 2003. Application of an automated immunomagnetic separation-enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Salmonella spp. during an outbreak associated with a retail premises. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 37(2):144-148.
  6. Feng, P. 1995. Appendix 1. Rapid methods for detecting foodborne pathogens. In Food and Drug Administration: bacteriological analytical manual, 8th Ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
  7. Fierens, H. and A. Huyghebaert. 1996. Screening of Salmonella in naturally contaminated feeds with rapid methods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 32:301-309.
  8. Flowers, R.S., M. J. Klatt, S. L. Keelan, B. Swaminathan, W. D. Gehle and H. E. Chandonnet. 1989. Fluorescent enzyme immunoassay for rapid screening of Salmonella in foods: collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Ana. Chem. 72(2):318-325.
  9. Grimont, P. A., F. Grimont and P. Bouvet. 2000. Taxonomy of the genus Salmonella, In: (Ed. C. Wray and A. Wary), Salmonella in domestic animals, CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK. pp. 1-17.
  10. Huang, H., M. M. Garcia, B. W. Brooks, K. Nielsen and S. P. Ng. 1999. Evaluation of culture enrichment procedures for use with Salmonella detection immunoassay. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 51:85-94.
  11. Kang, S. N., A. Jung, S. O. Lee, J. S. Min, I. S. Kim and M. H. Lee. 2003. Effect of organic acids on microbial populations and Salmonella typhimurium in pork loins. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:96-99.
  12. Krusell, L. and N. Skovgaard. 1993. Evaluation of a new semiautomated screening method for the detection of Salmonella in foods within 24 h. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 20:123-130.
  13. Mead, P. S., L. Slutsker, V. Dietz, L. F. McCaig, J. S. Bresee, C. Shapiro, P. M. Griffin and R. V. Tauxe. 1999. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5(5):607-625.
  14. Valdivieso-garcia, A., E. Riche, O. Abubakar, T. E. Waddell and B. W. Brooks. 2001. A double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Salmonella using biotinylated monoclonal antibodies. J. Food Prot. 64(8):1166-1171.
  15. Williams, J. E. 1981. Salmonellas in poultry feeds-a worldwide review. Part I: Introduction. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 37:6-9. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19810002