An analysis of the dental arch and skeletal characteristics in adult patients exhibiting open bite

Openbite을 나타내는 성인의 치열 특성 및 그에 따른 골격적 특성 분석

  • Lee, Jin-Woo (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 이진우 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2004.08.01

Abstract

It is the purpose of this study to characterize oral symptoms and to comprehend the cause and the relapse possibility of patients with open bite. This case study examines the orthodontic treatment of a group of female patients with open bite and Angle's Class I malocclusion. A cephalograph of the patient was taken and tracing of the radiograph was completed. In addition to Bjork and Ricketts analysis, additional measurements of specific areas were taken. The occlusal plane was determined by drawing a line connecting the mesiobuccal cusp tip of the maxillary first molar and the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisors. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the relationship between the marginal ridge of the maxillayy first premolar and the drawn line. Those patients with marginal ridges above the occlusal plane were placed into Group 1, while Group 2 subjects exhibited marginal ridges lower than the occlusal plane. The common characteristics within each group and the characteristic differences between each group both prior to and after orthodontic treatment were examined, and finally, the functional oral volume of each patient was analyzed. The results of the case study were as follows: 1. An examination of the skeletal relationship and anatomical form for both Group 1 and 2 showed that all subjects exhibited hyperdivergent skeletal forms, but Group 2 subjects generally demonstrated underdevelopment of the mandible and a smaller articular angle, resulting in an anterior positioning tendency of the mandible. 2. An analysis of the maxillary arches of Group 1 subjects prior to and after orthodontic treatment showed that the antero-inferior direction had changed to an antero-superior directional tendency, while the maxillary arches of the Group 2 patients showed a trend from an antero-superior direction to an antero-inferior relationship. The mandibular arches in both groups showed a change to an antero-superior direction. 3. Functional space analysis showed that Group 2 patients exhibited a greater tendency of haying palatal planes that drop in a postero-inferior direction, resulting in a more severe open bite than their Group 1 counterparts. The results of this case study show that although patients belonging to either Group 1 or 2 exhibited few external differences in the appearance of open bite, an examination of the dental and skeletal relationships by analyzing patient cephalographs showed that patients presenting with flat maxillary occlusal planes exhibited more severe open bite relationships than patients with curved occlusal planes.

Keywords

References

  1. Richardson A. Skeletal factors in anterior open-bite and deep overbite. Am J Orthod 1969;56:114-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90228-0
  2. Cangialosi TJ. Skeletal morphologic features of antetior open bite. Am J Orthod 1984;85:28-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90120-9
  3. Isaacson JR, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM, Worms FW. Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations. Angle Orthod 1971;41:219-29
  4. Isaacson RJ, Zapfel RJ, Worms FW, Erdman AG. Effects of rotation jaw growth on the occlusion and profile. Am J Orthod 1977;72:276-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90213-5
  5. Subtelny JD, Sakuda M. Openbite diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod 1964;50:337-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(64)90175-7
  6. Nahomn HI, Horowitz SL, Benedicto EA. Varieties of anterior open bite. Am J Orthod 1972;61:486-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90153-4
  7. Nemeth RB, Isaacson RJ. Vertical anterior relapse. Am J Orthod 1974;65:565-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90254-1
  8. Handelman CS, Osborne G. Growth of the nasopharynx and adenoid development from one to eighteen years. Angle Orthod 1976;46:243-59
  9. Lowe AA, Takada K, Yarnagata Y, Sakuda M. Dentoskeletal and tongue soft-tissue correlates;A cephalometric analysis of rest position. Am J Orthod 1985;88:333-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90133-2
  10. 김정훈, 이기수, 혀의 자세 및 크기와 치아치조골 패턴의 관계에 대한 연구. 대치교정지 1987;17:33-45
  11. 이용승, 김종철. 부정교합 유형에 따른 기도의 크기. 대치교정지 1995;25:19-29
  12. Nahoum HI, Horowitz SL, Behedicto EA. Varieties of anterior openbite. Am J Orthod 1972;61:486-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90153-4
  13. O'Ryan FS, Gallagher DM, Labanc JP, Epker BN. The relation between nasorespiratory function and dentofacial morphology. A review. Am J Orthod 1982;82:403-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90189-0
  14. Toume LP. Growth of the pharynx and its physiologic implication. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:129-39 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70115-D
  15. Handelman CS, Osborne G. Growth of the nasopharynx and adenoid development from one to eighteen years. Angle Orthod 1976;46:243-59
  16. 이승연, 장영일 교합평변 경사도에 관한 두부방사선학적 연구. 대치교정지 1991;21:367-97
  17. Sarver DM, Weissman SM, Johnston MW. Diagnosis and treatment planning of hypodivergent skeletal pattern with clockwise occlusal plane rotation. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg.1993;8:113-21
  18. Kim YH. Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open bite. Am J Orthod 1974;65:586-611 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90255-3
  19. Downs WE. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1952;38:162-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(52)90106-1
  20. Ricketts RM, Roth RH, Chaconas SJ. Orthodontic diagnosis and planning. Rocky Mountain Data System; 1985, Vol 1
  21. Ricketts RM. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod 1960;46:330-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(60)90047-6
  22. Downs WB. Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 1956;26:191-212
  23. Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954;24:121-69
  24. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959;29 :8-29
  25. Mc Narnara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J orthod 1984;86:449-69 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90352-X
  26. Bjork A. Cephalometric X-ray investigations in dentistry. Int Dent J 1954:4:78-744