Evaluation of various cephalometric measurements to predict the prognosis of early Class III malocclusion treatment

III급 부정교합의 조기 치료 예후 예측를 위한 두부방사선 계측 변수의 평가

  • Son, Myung-Ho (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chang, Young-Il (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 손명호 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학 교실) ;
  • 장영일 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학 교실)
  • Published : 2004.06.01

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the differences in the early craniofacial morphology of Class III malocclusions with good, fair and poor occlusal stability and to elucidate a key determinant for distinguishing the cases. Lateral cephalograms of 30 subjects with Class III malocclusion in the mixed dentition were analyzed at the start of treatment (mean age of $8.58\pm1.47$). All subjects were reevaluated after a mean period of $7.50\pm1.94$ years comprising active treatment and retention. At this time, the samples were divided into three groups: good (10 subjects), fair (10 subjects) and poor (10 subjects) occlusal stability groups. According to the results of ANOVA, there were significant morphological differences in the early stage among the good, fair and poor occlusat stability groups, especially in variables that represented the vertical skeletal relationships. As well, there were already more dental compensations in the poor occlusal stability group. Stepwise discriminant analysis on the measurements at the time of first observation identified only one predictive variable: AB to mandibular plane angle(AB-MP). With this discriminant function, $83.3\%$of the original grouped cases were correctly classified and the canonical correlation coefficient was 0.857. In conclusion, AB-MP can be a possible predictor for the eventual prognosis of early Class III treatment. If it is below 60, the prognosis of early Class III treatment is expected to be poor, while if it is above 65, a good prognosis is expected.

III급 부정교합을 조기에 치료했을 때, 치료 후 retention 기간 중에 교합이 안정적으로 유지되는 경우와, 재발되어 성장 완료시기에 악교정수술을 해야 하는 경우를 경험하게 된다. 어린 년생부터 장기간에 걸쳐 교정치료를 했음에도 재발되어 악교정수술을 하는 경우에, 환자와 보호자는 소모된 시간과 경비에 대해 많은 실망을 하는 경우를 볼 수 있다. 교정치료 후 보정기간 중에 있는 30증례를 조사했다. 치료 완료된 교합상태를 교합안정 정도에 따라 good, fair, relapse군으로 나누어 치료 전 골격형태를 관찰한 결과, AB-MP 항목이 유의성 있는 차이를 보였다. 조기에 III급 부정교합을 치료하는 경우에, 치료 후 안정에 관한 예후를 평가하는데 AB-MP를 활용할 수 있다. AB-MP이 65이상인 경우에 조기치료가 권장되고, 60이하인 경우에는 성장이 완료될 때까지 연기할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Suhr JH, Nahm OS, Chang YI. Epidemiologic study of the prevalence of maloccusion in Korean. Korea J Orthod 1984 : 14 : 33-7
  2. Kang HK, Ryu YK. A study on theprevalence of malocclusion of Yonsei University students in 1991. Korea J Orthod 1992: 22 : 691-700
  3. Lew KK, Foong WC. Horizontal skeletal typing in an ethnic Chinese population with true Class III malocclusion, Br J Orthod 1993: 20 : 19-23
  4. Miyajima K, McNamara JA Jr, Sana M, Murata S. Anestimation of craniofacial growth in the untreated Class III female with anterior crossbite, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997: 112: 425-34
  5. Yang WS. The study on the orthodontic patients who visited Department of Orthodontics, Seoul National University Hospital during last 10 years(1985-1994). Korea J Orthod 1995: 25: 497-509
  6. Yu HS, Ryu YK; Lee JY. A study on the distribution and trends in malocclusion patients from Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University. Korea J Orthod 1999: 29 : 267-76
  7. Singh GO, McNamara JA, Lozanoff S. Procrustes, Euclidean and cephalometric analyses of the morphology of the mandible in human Class III malocclusions, Archs Oral Bioi 1998 : 43: 535-43
  8. Hopkin GB, Houston WJ, James GA. The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion, Angle Orthod 1968 : 38 : 250-5
  9. Guyer EC, Ellis EIII, McNamara JA Jr., Behrent RG, Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents, Angle Orthod 1986 : 56 : 7-30
  10. Chang HP, Kinoshita Z, Kawamoto T, Craniofacial pattern of Class III deciduous dentition, Angle Orthod 1992 : 62 : 139-44
  11. Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Class III malocclusion Inthe deciduous dentition : a mophological and correlation study, Europ J Orthod 1994 : 16 : 401-8 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/16.5.401
  12. Mitani H, Prepubertal growth of mandibular prognathism, Am J Orthod 1981 : 80 : 546-53
  13. Mitanl H, Sato K, Sugawara J. Growth of mandibular prognathism afterpubertal growth peak, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993 : 104: 330-6
  14. Sugawara J, Asano T, Endo N, Mitani H. Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism, Am J Orthod Dentofaclal Orthop 1990 : 98: 127-33
  15. Sakamoto T. Effective timing for the application of orthopedic force in the skeletal Class III malocclusion, Am J Orthod 1981 : 80: 411-6
  16. Hopkin GB,The growth factor in the prognosis of treated cases of Angle Class III malocclusion, Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc 1965 : 41 : 353-63
  17. Kerr WJ, Miller S, Dawber JE. Class III malocclusion : surgery or orlhodontics?, Br J Orthod 1992: 19 : 21-4
  18. Rhee SH, Nahm OS. Surgery vs orthodontics in Class III malocclusion, J Kor Dent Assoc 1999 : 37 : 365-75
  19. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Tollaro I. Predictive variables for theoutcome of early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion, Am J Orthod Dentofaclal Orthop 1997 : 112: 80-6
  20. Tahmina K, Tanaka E, Tanne K. Craniofacial morphology In orthodontically treated patients of Class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 : 117: 681-90
  21. Battagel JM. Discriminant analysis : a model for the prediction of relapse in Class III children treated orthodontically by a nonextraction technique. Europ J Orthod 1993 : 15 : 199-209 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/15.3.199
  22. Yang WS, Kim BH. The retrospective study on the indication of the chin cap therapy. Kor J Orthod 1995 : 25 : 1-12
  23. Sung JH, Kwon OW, Kim SD. The retrospective study on the prognosis of Class III malocclusion treatments. Korea J Orthod 1998 : 28 : 175-87
  24. Ko YI. A retrospective study on the long-term result of chin cap therapy. Master thesis of Graduate School of Seoul National University, 2000
  25. Hur JS. A study of changes in facial profile and skeletal pattern in combined activator therapy of anterior crossbite. Master thesis of Graduate School of Seoul National University, 2000
  26. Nakasima A, Ichinose M. Role of parental variables in predicting facial growth after treatment of anterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofaclal Orthop 1986 : 90 : 492-500
  27. Johnston LE. A statistical evaluation of cephalometric prediction. Angle Orthod 1968 : 38 : 284-304
  28. Battagel JM. Predictors of relapse in orthodontlcallv-treated Class III malocclusions. Br J Orthod 1994 : 21 : 1-13
  29. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: lnterscience Publication, 1940
  30. Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism : background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod 1980 : 7 : 145-61
  31. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Sato H. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variation in sagittal jaw relationships. Angle Orthod 1999: 69 : 534-8
  32. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Chu S. Dentoalveolar compensation in negative overjet case. Angle Orthod 2000 : 70 : 145-8
  33. Shim HY. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy in normal occlusion. Master thesis of Graduate School of Seoul National University, 2001
  34. Kim YH. Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior openbite Am J Orthod 1974 : 65 : 586-611