대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제34권2호
  • /
  • Pages.189-195
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지

고정식 교정장치 부착환자에서 음파칫솔의 치면세균막 제거 효과에 관한 연구

Research on plaque removal by sonic toothbrush for patients with a fixed orthodontic appliance

  • 차경석 (단국대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Cha, Kyung-Suk (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 발행 : 2004.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 고정식 교정장치 부착환자에서 음파잇솔질과 수동잇솔질의 치면세균막 제거능력을 비교, 평가하여 교정치료시 지속적이고 효과적인 구강위생 관리 방법을 제시하고자 하는데 있다. 비발치 환자로 상, 하악 제 2대구치까지 고정식 교정장치를 부착한 청소년기 아동(남자 23명, 여자 37명)과 성인(남자 15명, 여자 45명)을 대상으로 하여 각각을 수동잇솔질과 음파잇솔질 군으로 분류하였다. 음파칫솔은 Philips oral healthcare HX-4401을 사용하였으며 잇솔질시간은 음파, 수동 모두 2분으로 표준화시켰다. 잇솔질 후 치면세균막 지수는 Wilkins의 PHP를 변형시켜 측정하였다. 각 군의 치면세균막 지수를 측정하여 비교한 결과 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 청소년, 성인 모두에서 음파잇솔군의 치면세균막지수 감소효과가 수동잇솔군에 비해 유의하게 크게 나타났다(청소년 : p<0.01 성인 : p<0.05). 2. 청소년과 성인을 구분하여 치면세균막지수 감소양상을 비교하였을 때 청소년에서 더 큰 감소 효과를 보였다.(p<0.01). 3. 같은 칫솔종류를 사용할 경우 청소년, 성인간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다.

The purpose of this research is to evaluate and compare the plaque removal ability of sonic brushing and manual brushing in order to present a method for continuous and effective oral hygiene control during orthodontic treatment. Nonextracted adolescent patients (male: 23 persons, female: 37 persons) and adult patients (male: 15 persons, female: 45 persons) outfitted with a fixed orthodontic appliance from their incisors to second molar, in both the maxilla and mandible, were divided into manual brushing and sonic brushing groups. A Philips oral healthcare HX-4401 sonic toothbrush was used, and the application of brushing for the two groups was standardized at two minutes. After brushing, the plaque score was measured with a modified Wilkin's PHP. The following results were achieved after comparing each group's plaque score. 1. In patients with a fixed orthodontic appliance when age was not accounted for, the application of sonic brushing exerted a beneficially decreased effect on the plaque score. (adolescents : p<0.01, adults: p<0.05) 2. When comparing the adolescent and adult groups in regard to plaque score, the adolescent group showed a more decreased effect. 3. When using the same toothbrush type, there was no difference between the adolescent and adult groups.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Loee H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol 1965 : 36 : 177-87
  2. Lindhe J, Hamp SE, Loe H. Plaque induced periodontal disease in beagle dogs. A 4-yeer Clinical, roentgenographical and histonetris cal Study. J Periodontal Res 1975 : 10 : 243-55
  3. Suomi JD, Doyle J. Oral hygiene and periodontal disease in an adult population in the United States. J Periodontol 1972 : 43 : 677-81
  4. Finkestein P, Grossman E. The clinical quantitative assessmentof the mechanical cleaning efficiency of toothbrushes. Clinical Pre Dent 6 : 7-12, 1984
  5. De la Rosa M, Zacarias Guerra J, Johnston DA, Radike AW. Plaque growth and removal with daily toothbrushing. J Periodontol 1979 : 50: 661-4
  6. Zachrisson BU Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and suppor ting structuresduring orthodontic treatment Am J Orthod 1976 : 69 : 285-300
  7. Boyd RL. Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self-monitoring plaque control effectiveness in orthodontic patients. J Clin Periodontol 1983 : 10 : 380-8
  8. Rosendal PO. Toothbrushing, yesterday, today, tomorrow. South Calif Dent Assoc J 1962 : 30 : 210-13
  9. Quigley GA, Hein JW. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc 1962 : 65 : 26-9
  10. Glass RL. A clinical study of hand and electric toothbrushing. J Peri-odontol 1965 : 36: 322-7
  11. Wilkins EM. Periodontal and dental indices. In Clinical practice of the dental hygienist 1976 : 273-83
  12. Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with ort hodontic treatment Angle Orthod 1972 : 42 : 26-34
  13. Diamanti-Kipioti A, Gusberti FA, Lang NP. Clinical and microbio logical effects of fixed orthodontic appliances. J Clin Periodontol 1987: 14: 326-33
  14. Balenseifen JW, Madonia JV. Study of dental plaque in orthodontic patients. J Dent Res 1970 : 49 : 320-4
  15. Bloom RH, Brown LR Jr. A study of the effects of orthodontic appliances on the oral microbialflora. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964: 17 : 658-67
  16. 김종배, 최유진, 백대일, 신승철, 김동기, 홍석진 임상예방치학, 제 2판 1993: 79-84
  17. Norman O. Harris, Arden G. Christen. Primary preventive dentistry 1991 : 3 : 93-95
  18. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Nijboer A, Lie MA, Van der Velden U. A comparative study of electrical toothbrushes for the effectiveness of plaque removal in relation to toothbrushing duration timer-study. J Clin Periodontol 1993: 20: 476-81
  19. Boyd RL, Murray P, Robertson PB. Effect of rotaly electric toothbrush versus manual toothbrush on periodontal status during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989: 96 : 342-7
  20. Trombeli L, Scabbia A, Griselli A, Zangari F, Calura G. Clinical eval-uation of plaque removal by counterrotational electric toothbrush in orthodontic patients. Quintessence Int. 1995: 26 : 199-202
  21. Wilcoxon DB, Ackerman RJ Jr, Killoy WJ, Love JW, Sakumura JS, Tira DE. The effectiveness of a counterrotational action power too thbrush on plaque control in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Den-tofacial Orthop 1991 : 99 : 7-14
  22. Clerehugh V, Williams P, Shaw WC, Worthington HV, Warren P. A practice-based randomized controlledtrial of the efficacy of an electric and a manual toothbrush on gingival health in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. J Dent 1998: 26 : 633-9
  23. Burch JG, Lanese R, Ngan P. A two-month study of the effects of oral irrigation and automatic toothbrush use in an adult orthodontic population with fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994: 106 : 121-6
  24. Heintze SD, Jost-Brinlanann PG, Loundos J. Effectiveness of three different types of electric toothbrushes compared with a manual technique in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996: 110 : 630-8
  25. Walmsley AD. The electric toothbrush: a review. Br Dent J 1997: 182 : 209-18
  26. Heasman P, Wilson Z, Macgregor I, Kelly P. Comparative study of electric and manual toothbrushes in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998: 114 : 45-9
  27. Jackson CL. Comparison between electric toothbrushing and manual toothbrushing, with and without oral irrigation, for oral hygiene of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991: 99 : 15-20
  28. Hickman J. Milillett DT, Sander L, Brown E. Love J Powered vs man-ual tooth brushing in fixed appliance patients : A short term rando mized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 2002: 72 : 135-40
  29. Womack WR, Guay AH. Comparative cleansing efficiency of an elec tric and a manual toothbrush in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1968: 38 : 256-67
  30. Trimpeneers LM, Wijgaerts lA, Grognard NA, Dermaut LR, Adriaens PA. Effect of electric toothbrushes versus manual toothbrushes on removal of plaque and periodontalstatus during orthodontic treatment Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997 : 111 : 492-7
  31. Ash MM. A review of the problems and results of studies on manual and power toothbrushes. J Periodontol 1964: 35 : 202-13
  32. Silness J. Laee H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964: 22 : 121-35
  33. Saxer UP, Muhlemann HR. Motivation and education, SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zabhnheilked. 1975 : 85 : 905-19
  34. Kerlinger FN. Foundations of behavioral research, educational and psychological injury. New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., 1965
  35. Darby ML. Bowen DM. Reasearch methods for oral health prafe-ssionals : an intro duction. The CV Mosby Company, St. Louis, 1980