A Comparative Study on the Changing Pattern of Fish and Shellfish Uses in ${\ulcorner}Eum-sik-di-mi-bang{\lrcorner}$ and ${\ulcorner}Gyu-hap-chong-seo{\lrcorner}$ in Sight of the Development of Fishing Technology

어업기술의 발전 측면에서 본 음식디미방과 규합총서 속의 어패류 이용 양상의 비교 연구

  • Kim, Hee-Sun (Dept. of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, College of Natural Sciences, Sangmyung University)
  • 김희선 (상명대학교 외식영양학과)
  • Published : 2004.06.30

Abstract

This study is on the changing pattern of fish-and-shellfish uses during the last two thirds of Chosun period on the premise that they are influenced by development of fishing technology. With a literary approach, this paper researches how fish-and-shellfish production and consumption pattern changed, especially in relation to technological development of fisheries. First, we examine into the changes of fishery production. And next, we analyze the kind and cooking method of fish-and-shellfish in [Eum-sik-di-mi-bang](1670) and [Gyu-hap-chong-seo](1815). The analysis of two books revealed that there were significant differences in fish-and-shellfish uses. Because the two books were written with a gap of 145 years and the development of fishing technology and remarkable changes of fishery production affected on the fish-and-shellfish uses. Due to primitive fishing tools and skills, fresh-water and reverse-river-fish and shellfish had been caught in substantial amount until the middle ages of Chosun period. As a result, the availability of seafood were limited extremely even in the upper classes. These situations are evidenced by the analysis of [Eum-sik-di-mi-bang]. Only 12 kinds of fish-and-shellfish are described in [Eum-sik-di-mi-bang]. Most of the sesfoods is mollusc which is easy to catch. As for the salt-water fish, dried cod and dried herring were mentioned. Mullet, the reverse-water-fish, is used most frequently. Only one kind of 'Hoe', which needs extreme freshness, is described. This means that the use of fresh fish-and-shellfish was very limited to some kinds which could be caught near the village. As the netting fishery began to be developed in the 18th century, the production of some salt-water fishes, such as anchovy, shrimp, yellow corvina, pollack, and herring, had increased remarkably to make marine resources more available. Small fish, such as anchovy and shrimp were preserved as 'Jeot-gal' and sold nationwide. Therefore, 'Jeot-gal' and seafood could be used in Kimchi around this time and had a deep influence on the change of Kimchi in taste and nutrition. In [Gyu-hap-chong-seo], 33 kinds of fish-and-shellfish are described. Including cod and herring, 17 kinds of sea water fish and mollusc are mentioned. Some of these are consumed in fresh state, neither as dried nor as salted. Because the merchants promoted the transport of seafoods to other regions according to the growth of commercial economy. As a result the diet of the people could be enriched by the various seafoods.

Keywords

References

  1. 이춘령, 이조농업기술사, 한국연구원, 1964, p.30
  2. 이효지, [규합총서 주식의]의 조리과학적 고찰, 한양대학교사범대학 사대논문집 창간호. 1981, pp.85-103
  3. 송유명, 우리나라의 전통적인 조리법에 대한 연구:규합총서 중 주식의편을 중심으로, 성균관대 석사학위논문, 1983
  4. 한계회, 우리나라 전통적인 식품조리법에 관한 연구:'규곤시의방'과'규합총서'를 중심으로, 서울여대 석사학위 논문, 1983
  5. 명춘옥, 조선후기 조리서에 나타난 죽 조리법의 고찰: 산림경제, 증보산림경제, 규합총서를 중심으로, 오산전문대학 논문집 15, 1995, pp.481-493
  6. 김기숙,'음식디미방'에 수록된 면병류와 한과류의 조리법에 관한 고찰, 중앙대학교생활과학연구소 생활과학논집 12, 1999, pp.121-141
  7. 김기숙, '음식디미방'에 수록된 채소 및 과일류의 저장법과 조리법에 관한 고찰, 중앙대학교생활과학연구소 생활과학논집 12, 1999, pp.143-159
  8. 신민자, 최영진, 규합총서를 통해서 본 우리나라 전통음식의 향약성 효과에 관한 고찰: 주부식류를 중심으로, 경희대학교 관광산업정보논집 1, 1999, pp.137-153
  9. 배영동, '음식디미방'에 나타난 술의 다양성과 그 사회적 의미, 국립문화재연구소 문화재 제34호, 2001, pp.102-122
  10. 신민자, 이영순, 최수근,'음식디미방'에 수록된 전통음식의 향약성에 관한 고찰, 동아시아식생활학회지 11(5), 2001, pp.325-335
  11. 김미희 외, 규합총서에 나타난 농산물 이용 고찰, 한국가정관리학회지 21(1), 2003, pp.113-127
  12. G. H. Pelto, Anthropological contributions to nutrition education research, Journal of Nutritional Education, 13(suppl), 1981, S4
  13. 김희선, 조선후기 사회.경제적 변동이 식생활에 미친 영향, 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문, 1987, pp.44-47
  14. 이철호, 식습관 변천과 오늘의 영양문제, 국민영양 88(10), 1995, pp.5-7
  15. 수산청, 현대한국수산사, 1987, p.8-12
  16. 황혜성 편, 규곤시의방, 한국인서출판사, 1980
  17. 빙허각 이씨, 정양원 편, 閨閤叢書, 보진재, 1975
  18. 수산청, 한국의 수산, 1966, pp.33-34
  19. 박구병, 한국수산업사, 태화출판사, 1966, pp.78-83
  20. 수산사 편찬위원회, 한국수산사, 수산청, 1968, p.30
  21. 김희선, 수산업생산의 변화에 따른 한국인의 어패류 이용양상의 변천, 이화여자대학교 박사학위 논문, 2002, pp.105-109
  22. Reay Tannahill, Food in history, New York, Crown, 1989, pp.174-176
  23. 수산청, 전게서, 1966, pp.36-37
  24. 수산청, 동상서, pp.37-39
  25. 박구병, 전게서, 1966, pp.84-85
  26. 박구병, 동상서, p.94
  27. 박구병, 동상서, pp.90-91
  28. 수산청, 전게서, 1966, pp.32-33
  29. 김희선, 전게서, 1987, pp.53-55
  30. 박구병, 한국어업사, 정음사, 1975, pp.133-141
  31. 안동장씨, 한복려, 한복선, 한복진 편, 음식디미방, 궁중음식연구원, 1999, p.12
  32. 김희선, 전게서, 2002, p.111
  33. 이성우, 한국요리문화사, 교문사, 1985, pp.231-232
  34. 이성우, 조선시대 조리서의 분석적연구, 한국정신문화연구원, 1982, p.35
  35. 김희선, 전게서, 1987, pp.59-60