구강 편평태선 환자에서 steroid와 cyclosporine의 국소 도포 효과

THE EFFECT OF TOPICAL APPLICATION WITH STEROID AND CYCLOSPORINE ON ORAL LICHEN PLANUS PATIENTS

  • 홍순민 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 박성진 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 박지현 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 윤필영 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 명훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 고홍섭 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강내과진단학교실) ;
  • 정성창 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강내과진단학교실) ;
  • 이종호 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김명진 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Hong, Soon-Min (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Jin (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Jee-Hyun (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yun, Pil-Young (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kho, Hong-Seop (Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Diagnosis, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chung, Sung-Chang (Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Diagnosis, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.06.30

초록

The purpose of this study was comparing the effectiveness in the topical applications of cyclosporine with that of steroid, the conventional and standard drug in the treatment of oral lichen planus. 21 patients with oral lichen planus were treated with cyclosporine (n=11) or steroid (n=10) by random allocations. They were recalled 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after initial treatments. In each recall, the lesion size, clinical symptoms like pain or burning sensation, and side effects were evaluated. The differences of these measurements were compared and the effects of each drug were checked. In reticulation types, steroid showed higher effectivity than cyclosporine and this difference was significant statistically. But in erythema type lesions, either drug showed no significant recovery, statistically. However, the effect of cyclosporine was thought to be more effective. The pain of the lesions was significantly decreased by cyclosporine but not by steroid. The decrease of burning sensation was more dependant upon steroid than cyclosporine, but no statistical relationship could be found. There were no clinical side effects. There was limitation to draw in conclusion due to small pool of this study group. But with the results, this suggestion could be proposed that either drug might be superior to another in effectivity in a specific lesion type or patient symptom, so selection and usage of one drug in a specific case could be better than universal application of one drug in all cases.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Eisen D. Evaluating and treating patients with oral lichen planus. Dermatologic Therapy 2002;15:206-217 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8019.2002.01529.x
  2. Felice F, Fernando G, Crispian S. Oral erosive/ulcerative lichen planus: preliminary findings in an open trial of sulodexide compared with cyclosporine therapy. Int J Dermato 2003;42:308-311 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01770.x
  3. Mycek MJ, Harvey RA, Champe PC, Fisher BD. Lippincott's illustrated reviews: Pharmacology 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2000
  4. Thongprasom K, Luangjarmekorn L, Sererat T, Taweesap W. Relative efficacy of fluocinolone acetonide compared with triamcinolone acetonide in treatment of oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med 1992;21:456-458 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1992.tb00974.x
  5. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976;2:175-184 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(76)90113-5
  6. Wilson E. On leichen planus. J Cutan Med Dis Skin 1869;3:117-32
  7. Axell T, Siwamogstham P, Tantiniran D, Tampipit J. Prevalence of oral soft tissue lesions in outpatients at two Malaysian and Thai dental schools. J Comm Dent Oral Epidem 1990;18:95-99 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1990.tb00026.x
  8. 조한국. Oral lichen planus, Review of literature and report of a case. 대한 구강병리학회지 1977;1:7-9
  9. 임창윤, 손광웅, 류광희. 구강에 발생된 편평태선의 병리학적 연구. 대한구강병리학회지 1980;3:53-60
  10. 정성창, 이승우, 고재승. 수종 구강점막질환에 관한 전자 현미경적 연구, 편평태선. 대한구강내과학회지 1982;7:95-121
  11. 정성창, 김기석, 임동우. 미란성 구강편평태선에 대한 griseofulvin의 치료효과. 대한치과의사협회지 1987;7:673-679
  12. Andreasen JO. Oral lichen planus. A clinical evaluation of 115 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1968;25:31-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(68)90194-1
  13. Thorn JJ, Holmstrup P, Rindum J, Pindborg JJ. Course of various clinical forms of oral lichen planus: A prospective follow-up study of 611 patients. J Oral Pathol 1998;17:213-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1988.tb01527.x
  14. Scully C, Cawson R. Potentially malignant oral lesions. J Epidem Biostats 1996;1:3-12
  15. Barnard NA, Scully C, Eveson JW, Cunningham S, Porter SR. Oral cancer development in patients with oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med 1993:22:421-4
  16. De Panfilis G. ‘Activation-induced cell death’: a special program able to preserve the homeostasis of the skin? Exp Dermatol 2002;11:1-11
  17. Kromminga A, Sitaru C, Meyer J, Arndt R, Schmidt E, Christophers E, Brocker. EB, Zillikens D. Cicatricial pemphigoid differs from bullous pemphigoid and pemphigoid gestationis regarding the fine specificity of autoantibodies to the BP180 NC16A domain. J Dermatol Sci 2002;28:68-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-1811(01)00144-X
  18. Zhao ZZ, Sugerman PB, Zhou XJ, Walsh LJ, Savage NW. Mast cell degranulation and the role of T cell RANTES in oral lichen planus. Oral Dis 2001;7:246-51 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-0825.2001.70408.x
  19. Jungell P. Oral lichen planus. A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;20:129-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80001-3
  20. Aufemorte TB, De Villex RL, Gieseker DR. Griseofulvin in the treatment of three cases of oral erosive lichen plauns. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;55:459-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(83)90231-1
  21. Simon M, Hornstein O. Prevalence rate of candida in oral cavity of patients with oral lichen planus. Arch Derm Res 1980;267:317-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403853
  22. Regezi JA, Ellis CN, Stwart JCB, Giustina TA. Histologic changes associated with the topical use of isotretinoin on oral lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;61:479-484 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90391-9
  23. Lehtinen R, happonen RP, Kuusileto A, Jansen C. A clinical trial of PUVA treatment in oral lichen planus. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1989;85:29-33
  24. Roodenberg JLN, Panders AK, Vermey A, Verschueren RCJ. Treatment of superficial lesions of the oral mucosa with the carbon dioxide laser: a report of 58cases, with 5 years follow-up. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 1983;3:283-6
  25. Pedersen A, Klansen B.. Glucocorticosteroids and oral medicine. J Oral Pathol 1984;13:1-15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1984.tb01395.x
  26. Zegarelli DJ. Multimodality steroid therapy of erosive and ulcerative oral lichen planus. J Oral Med 1983;3:127-30
  27. Silverman S Jr Lozada-Nur F, Migliorati C. Clinical efficacy of prednisolone in the treatment of Patients with oral inflammatory ulcerative diseases: A Study of fifty-five patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;59:360-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(85)90060-X
  28. Ho VC, Conkin RJ. Effect of topical cyclosporine rinse on lichen planus. N Engl J Med 1991;325:435
  29. Levell NJ, MacLeod RI, Marks JM. Lack of effect of cyclosporine mouthwash in oral lichen planus. Lancet 1991;337:796-7
  30. Eisen D, Ellis CN, Duell EA, Griffiths CEM, Voorhees JJ. Effects of topical cyclosporine rinse on oral lichen planus: A double blind analysis. N Engl J Med 1990;323:290-94 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199008023230502