BLOOD VISCOSITY CHANGE IN ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA XENOTRANSPLANTED NUDE MICE

구강편평세포암종 이식 누드마우스에서의 혈액 점도 변화

  • Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choung, Pill-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 명훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이종호 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정필훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김명진 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2004.04.30

Abstract

It is well known that malignant tumor have hypoxic cell fraction, which is radio resistant and is one of the most important cause of local recurrence after radiotherapy. One of the causes of hypoxia in tumor is blood flow decrease due to increase in blood flow resistance and one of the causes of increased blood flow resistance could be attributed to the increase in blood viscosity. For the evaluation of the change of blood viscosity in oral cancer, experiments were carried out to test the change of blood viscosity among the normal control and xenografted oral cancer nude mice. Relative viscosity measured against distilled water was $3.30{\pm}0.14$ for normal control, and $3.67{\pm}0.62$ for tumor bearing mice at the first time of blood sampling in experimental period ($100mm^3$ $200mm^3$). There was no statistically significant difference between the control group and experimental group (p>0.05). However, as the tumor grew, significant difference of blood viscosity was detected at the third time of blood sampling (control group:$3.37{\pm}0.59$, and experimental group: $4.31{\pm}0.41\;300mm^3$

Keywords

References

  1. Guichard M Chemical manipulations of tissue oxygenation for therapeutic benefit. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989
  2. Moulder JE, Rockwell S. Hypoxic fractions of solid tumors: experimental techniques, methods of analysis, and a survey of existing data. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.10(5):695-712, 1984
  3. Denekamp J, Fowler JF, Dische S. The proportion of hypoxic cells in a human tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2(11-12):1227-8, 1977
  4. Powers WE, Tolmach LJ. A multicomponent x-ray survival curve for mouse lymphosarcoma cells irradiated in vivo. Nature. 16;197:710-1, 1963
  5. Thomlinson RH, Gray LH. The histological structure of some human lung cancers and the possible implications for radiotherapy. Br J Cancer. 9(4):539-49, 1955
  6. Miller B, Heilmann L. during treatment. Cancer. 15;62(2):350-4. Hemorheologic variables in breast cancer patients at the time of diagnosis, 1988
  7. Jain RK. Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review.Cancer Res. 15;48(10):2641-58. 1988
  8. Miller B, Heilmann L. Hemorheological parameters in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 33(2):177-81, 1989
  9. Boring CC, Wquires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics. Cancer J. Clin 42:19-38, 1992
  10. Wong DTW, Todd R, Tsuiji T, Donoff RB. Molecular biology of oral cancer. Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. 7:319-328, 1996
  11. Henk JM. Late results of a trial of hyperbaric oxygen and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a rationale for hypoxic cell sensitizers? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 12(8):1339-41, 1986
  12. Hall EJ. The oxygen effect an reoxygenation. In Radiology for the radiologist. (4th Ed) J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1994:pp133-152