Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

  • 제30권1호
  • /
  • Pages.25-33
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 2234-7550(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-5930(eISSN)
대한구강악안면외과학회 (The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)
권호 표지

하악전돌증 및 개교합 환자에 있어 Obwegeser Ⅱ method의 안정성

STABILITY OF OBWEGESER II METHOD IN MANDIBULAR PROGNATHIC OR ANTERIOR OPEN BITE PATIENTS

  • 정창욱 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 남정훈 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이상한 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 권대근 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Jung, Chang-Wook (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Nam, Jeong-Hun (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Han (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Tae-Geon (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative stability of the severe open bite or mandibular prognathic patients after mandibular set back surgery by Obwegeser II method. There were 19 patients who had been undergone Obwegeser II method. The horizontal and vertical position of the cephalometric points were measured preoperation and immediate postoperation, postoperative 1 month, postoperative 6 months ; were analyzed by linear measurement to evaluate changes in skeletal landmark and the relapse was compared between open bite group and prognathism group. By the operation, horizontal change of B was $6.84{\pm}4.35mm$ and vertical change of B was $6.28{\pm}3.25mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of B was $14.20{\pm}4.81mm$ and vertical change of B was $1.99{\pm}2.66mm$ in prognathism group, horizontal change of Pog was $3.82{\pm}5.71mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $5.38{\pm}2.11mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of Pog was $13.24{\pm}5.99mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $1.91{\pm}0.94mm$ in prognathism group. Between immediate postoperation and postoperative 1 month, all skeletal landmarks change was no statistical difference (p>0.05) and there were no statistical difference between open bite group and prognathism group except x-Me landmark (p>0.05). Between postoperative 1 month and 6 months, horizontal change of B was $0.12{\pm}1.35mm$ and vertical change of B was $1.47{\pm}1.48mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of B was $1.43{\pm}1.35mm$ and vertical change of B was $0.82{\pm}1.99mm$ in prognathism group, horizontal change of Pog was $0.13{\pm}1.40mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $0.88{\pm}1.71mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of Pog was $1.08{\pm}1.74mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $0.47{\pm}1.57mm$ in prognathism group (p>0.05) and there were no statistical difference between open bite group and prognathism group (p>0.05). Between immediate postoperation and postoperative 6months, horizontal change of B was $0.24{\pm}1.17mm$ and vertical change of B was $1.87{\pm}1.63mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of B was $1.54{\pm}1.55mm$ and vertical change of B was $1.04{\pm}1.96mm$ in prognathism group, horizontal change of Pog was $0.91{\pm}1.46mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $1.18{\pm}2.05mm$ in open bite group and horizontal change of Pog was $0.96{\pm}1.62mm$ and vertical change of Pog was $1.23{\pm}2.35mm$ in prognathism group (p>0.05) and there were statistical difference between open bite group and prognathism group in x-B, x-Pog, x-Gn, x-Me (p<0.05). Obwegeser II method is considered as one of the best operation when surgical correction of severe open bite or severe mandibular prognathism is needed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Obwegeser HL, Trauner R : Zur Operationstechnik bei der Progenie und anderen Unterkieferanomalien. Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferhlkd 1995;23:11-26
  2. Dal Pont G : Retromolar osteotomy for correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg 1961;19:42-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90214-8
  3. Obwegeser H : Der offene Biss in chirurgischer Sicht. Schweiz Monatschr Zahnhlkd 1964;74:668-687
  4. Shojiro Takahashi, Takashi Tsuruki : Obwegeser II method for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Maxillofac Surg 1980;8:288-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(80)80116-0
  5. Hiroyasu Noma, Takashi K, Yasuo Yusa, Yoshiaki Kukimoto : Surgical Correction of extreme prognathism by Lefort I osteotomy and Obwegeser II method. Jpn J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1981;27:12-19
  6. 김태준, 진우정, 신효근, 김오환 : Obwegeser II method와 Lefort I osteotomy를 이용한 하악 전돌증의 외과적 교정. 대한구강악안면외과학회지 1990;16:45-50
  7. 이근호, 권대근, 장도근, 이상한 : 심한 하악골 전돌증 환자의 외과적 치험례. 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지 1994;16:33-42
  8. Guernsey LH, DeChamplain RW : Sequelae and complications of the intraoral sagittal osteotomy in the mandibular ramus. Oral Surg 1971;32:176-192 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90221-0
  9. Hunsuck EE : A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technic for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 1968;26:249-264
  10. Epker BN, Wolford LM : Dentofacial deformities : surgical-orthognathic correction. St. Louis, Mosby, 1980
  11. Schendel SA, Epker BN : Results after mandibular advancement surgery : Analysis of 87 cases. J Oral Surgery 1980;38:265-282
  12. Ive J, McNeil RW, West RA : Mandibular advancement : skeletal and dental changes during fixation. J Oral Surgery 1977;35:881-886
  13. Lake SL, McNeil PW, Little RM, West RM : Surgical mandibular advancement : A cephalometric analysis of treatment response. Am J Orthod 1981;80:376-394 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90173-1
  14. Poulton DR, Ware HW : Surgical orthodontic treatment of severe mandibular retrusion. Part II, Am J Orthod 1971;59:244-265 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90098-4
  15. Epker BN, Wolford LM, Fish CC : Mandibular deficiency syndrome. Oral Surgery 1978;45:329-348 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(78)90520-0
  16. Steinhauser EW : Advancement of the mandibular by sagittal ramus split and suprahyoid myotomy. J Oral Surgery 1973;31:516-521
  17. Hirose T, Nakajima T, Kajikawa Y : Surgical-orthodontic approach to skeletal class III Malocclusion. J Oral Surg 1978;34:980-987
  18. Leonard M, Ziman P, Bevis R, Worms F : The sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Oral Surg 1985;60:459-466 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(85)90230-0
  19. Luhr HG : The significance of condylar position using rigid fixation in orthognathic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 1989;16:147-156
  20. Yellich GM, McNamara JA, Ungerleider JC : Muscular and mandibular adaptation after lengthening, detachment and reattachment of the masseter muscle. J Oral Surg 1981;39:656-665
  21. Franco JE, VanSickels JE, Thrash WJ : Factors contributing to relapse in rigidly fixed mandibular setbacks. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:693-697 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90036-4
  22. Lindorf HH : Functionally stable tandem screw fixation in sagittal ramus osteotomy : Surgical technique, new instrumentation and experiences. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1984;8:367-373
  23. Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C : Orthognathic surgery : A hierarchy of stability. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1996;11:191-204
  24. Ingervall B, Thuer U, Vuillemin T : Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular setback with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1995;10:15-25
  25. Kreckmov L, Lilija L, Ringquivist M : Sagital split osteotomy of the mandible without postoperative intermaxillary fixation, A clinical and cephalometric study. Scad J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1989;23:115-124 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844318909004503
  26. Sorokolit CA, Nanda R : Assessment of the stability of mandibular setback procedures with rigid fixation. J Oral Maxfac Surg 1990;48:817-822 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90340-8
  27. 박희대, 권대근, 이상한 : 하악 전돌증 환자의 하악지 시상 골절단 술후 경조직 변화에 따른 안모 연조직 변화 분석. 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지 1996;18:87-108
  28. 주성채, 민병일 : 악교정수술시 견고 및 비견고고정에 따른 위치적 안정성에 관한 연구. 대한악안면성형외과학회지 1991;13:412-420
  29. 송재철, 이상한 : 개구교합을 가진 3급 부정교합환자의 악교정수술 후 재발에 관한 연구. 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지 1993;15:229-237
  30. Gassmann CJ, Van Sickels JE, Thrash WJ : Causes, location and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:450-454 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90229-U
  31. MacIntosh R : Experience with the sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus : A 13 years review. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;8:151-165
  32. Epker BN, Fish LC : The surgical-orthodontic correction of Class III skeletal open-bite. Am J Orthod 1978;73:601-618 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90222-1
  33. Carlson DS, Schneiderman ED : Cephalometric analysis of adaptations after lengthening of the masseter muscle in adult rhesus monkeys. Arch Oral Biol 1983;28:627-637 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(83)90011-0
  34. 권대근, 이상한 : 최근 8년간 본교실에서 시행한 악교정수술의 임상적 검토. 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지 1995;17:1-9
  35. Martis C : Complications after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:101-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90320-3
  36. Karas ND, Boyd SB : Recovery of neurosensory function following orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:124-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80199-5
  37. Satoru Sonoda, Tamotsu Mimura, Kazuhiro Marutani, Etsuro Nozoe : Clinico-statistical study of jaw deformities in our clinic for past 10 years. Jpn J Jaw Deform 1993;3:135-138
  38. Reitzik M : The biometry of mandibular osteotomy repair. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1982;40:214-218 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(82)90313-5
  39. Perpersack WJ, Chausse JM : Long term follow up of the sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Maxillofac Surg 1978;6:117-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(78)80079-4