DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Transdermal Delivery of Ketoprofen and the Effect of Electroosmosis

케토프로펜의 경피전달 및 전기삼투압의 영향

  • 오승열 (숙명여자대학교 약학대학)
  • Published : 2004.12.20

Abstract

We investigated some important factors which affect the transdermal flux of ketoprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, as a first step to provide some basic knowledge for the development of a iontophoretic transdermal patch system. Factors such as current density, polarity, buffer (HEPES) and electrolyte concentration and pH were studied using hairless mouse skin. The effect of poly(L-lysin), which is known to affect the electro-osmotic flow through skin, on flux was also studied. Passive flux was about $20\;{\mu}g/cm^2hr$ at pH 4.0, but was negligible at pH 7.4 where all ketoprofen molecules dissolved are ionized (ketoprofen pKa=5.94). At pH 4.0, application of anodal current increased the flux further above the passive level, however anodal flux at pH 7.4 was much smaller than passive flux at pH 4.0. The application of cathodal current at pH 4.0 increased the average flux to $30-40\;{\mu}g/cm^2hr$, depending on the current density applied. At pH 7.4, cathodal flux was only about $5\;{\mu}g/cm^2hr$. Decrease in buffer and electrolyte concentration increased this cathodal flux about 10 fold. However decrease in HEPES buffer concentration 100 fold did not affect the flux. Anodal flux of acetaminophen was much larger than cathodal flux, indicating that electroosmotic flow can be playing an important role in the flux. Poly(L-lysin) increased the cathodal flux at pH 7.4. These results provide some important insights into the mechanism of transdermal flux of ketoprofen and the role of electroosmotic flow.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Chong, and H.L. Fung, Transdermal drug delivery systems: pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and tolerance development, Transdermal Drug Delivery: J. Hadgraft and RH. Guy Ed., Developmental Issues and Research Initiatives, Marcel Dekker, New York, p. 135 (1989)
  2. M.C. Audet, M. Moreau, W.D. Koltun, A.S. Waldbaum, G. Shangold, A.C. Fisher and G.W Creasy, Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs. an oral contraceptive: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 285(18), 2347-2354 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.18.2347
  3. Electronic Orange Book. Food and Drug Administration
  4. Retail and Provider Perspective. IMS Health (2001)
  5. M.J. Pikal, S. Shah, Transport mechanisms in iontophoresis. III. An experimental study of the contributions of electroosmotic flow and permeablity change in transport of low and high molecular weight solutes, Pharm. Res., 7, 222-229 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015809725688
  6. R.H. Guy, Y.N. Kalia, M.B. Delgado-Charro, V Merino, A. Lopez and D. Marro, Iontophoresis: Electrorepulsion and electroosmosis, J. Contr. Rel., 64, 129-132 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00132-7
  7. J. Hirvonen, Y.N. Kalia and R.H. Guy, Transdermal delivery of peptides by iontophoresis, Nature Biotech., 14, 1710-1713 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1296-1710
  8. J. Hirvonen and R.H. Guy, Iontophoretic delivery across the skin: Electroosmosis and its modulation by drug substances, Pharm. Res., 14, 1258-1263 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012127512251
  9. S.C. Chi and H.W. Jun, Anti-inflammatory activity of ketoprofen gel on carrageenan induced paw edema in rats, J. Pharm. Sci., 79, 974-977 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600791106
  10. A.R. Gennaro, Remington: The Science and practice of pharmacy, 19th Ed., Mack Publishing Company, Easton, pp. 1207-1218 (1995)
  11. J. Jacobs, A.G. Golstein, M.E. Kelly and B.S. Bloom, NSAIDs dosing schedules and compliance, Drug. Intell. Clin. Pharm., 22, 726-727 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1177/106002808802200926
  12. M.P. Cuthbert, Adverse reactions to non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs, Curro Med. Res. Opin., 2, 600-609 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1185/03007997409115265
  13. V. Merino, A. Lopez, Y.N. Kalia and R.H. Guy, Electrorepulsion versus electroosmosis: effect of pH on the iontophoretic flux of 5-fluorouracil, Pharm. Res., 16, 758-761 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018841111922
  14. B.D. Bath, H.S. White and E.R. Scott, Visualization and analysis of electroosmotic flow in hairless mouse skin, Pharm. Res., 17, 471-475 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007589306661
  15. D. Marro, R.H. Guy and M.B. Delgado-Charro, Characterization of the iontophoretic permselectivity properties of human and pig skin, J. Contr. Rei., 70, 213-217 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00350-3
  16. S.Y. Oh and R Guy, Effect of iontophoresis on the electrical properties of human skin in vivo, Int. J. Pharm., 124, 137-142 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(95)00180-Q
  17. R.R. Burnette and T.M. Bagniefski, The influence of constant current iontophoresis on the impedance and passive permeability of excised nude mouse skin, J. Pharm. Sci., 77, 492-497 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600770606
  18. J. Hirvonen and R.H. Guy, Attenuation of electroosmotic flow during transdermal iontophoresis. II. Effect of b-blocking agents, Proc. Int. Sympo. Control. ReI. Bioact. Mater., 24, 691-692 (1997)