Agronomic Characteristics and Path-coefficients of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Collections

잇꽃 수집종의 주요특성과 경로계수 분석

  • Park, Gyu-Hwan (Dept. of Plant Resources, College of Life & Resources, Sangju Natl. Univ.) ;
  • Jung, Do-Chul (Dept. of Plant Resources, College of Life & Resources, Sangju Natl. Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Cheol (Research Institute of Natural Product, Kyeongbuk Agric. Res. & Ext. Serv.) ;
  • Jeon, Chi-Hyeong (Dept. of Plant Resources, College of Life & Resources, Sangju Natl. Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Min (Institute of Genetic Engineering, Kyungpook Natl. Univ.)
  • 박규환 (상주대학교 식물자원학과) ;
  • 정도철 (상주대학교 식물자원학과) ;
  • 김재철 (경상북도농업기술원 신물질연구소) ;
  • 전치형 (상주대학교 식물자원학과) ;
  • 김경민 (경북대학교 유전공학연구소)
  • Published : 2004.03.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to obtain the basic information on mating parents and selection for high yielding safflower breeding. Thirty nine world safflower lines, which had collected from 13 countries of origjn, were evaluated for major agronomic characters, correlation and path-coefficients. The results obtained were summarized as follows. Days to flowers ranged from 83 days to 100 days. Days to flower of most foreign lines were later than that of domestic lines. Plant height ranged from 75 cm to 162 cm. The plant height and stem diameter of most foreign lines were higher than those of domestic lines. The leaf number and size of domestic lines were much more than those of foreign lines. The total branch numbers of foreign lines were more than domestic lines. Particularly, the number of third branch ranged from 0 to 25 and there were none in domestic lines. The number of corolla of foreign lines was much more than that of domestic lines. The yield of foreign lines collected from Central Asia and United States of America were more than any others. Significantly positive correlations were observed between yield and days to flower, stem diameter, the number of branch and the number of corolla. In the analysis of path-coefficient, the highest direct effects on yield was the number of corolla followed by the number of total branch, whereas those of the number of second branch and stem diameter were negative.

본 연구는 다수성 홍화 육종에 필요한 유전자원의 특성을 평가하여 교배모본으로 활용코자 원산지를 포함한 홍화 재배중심지에서 수집한 39개 계통을 대상으로 주요 농업형질의 재배적 특성을 비교하고 각 형질간의 상관 및 경로계수 등을 분석하였는 바 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 수집한 유전자원의 개화소요일수는 $83{\sim}100$일로 국내종 보다 만생인 계통이 많았다. 경장은 $75{\sim}165$\;cm$의 범위를 보여국내종 보다 국외 수집종이 대부분 장경이었고, 줄기 직경은 국외 수집종들이 국내종 보다 대부분 굵었다. 엽의 수와 면적은 국내종이 국외 수집종에 비해 많았고 큰 편이었다. 총분지수는 국외 수집종이 국내종보다 많았으며, 특히 3차 분지수의 범위는 $0{\sim}25$개로 큰 변이를 보였고 국내종의 경우는 3차 분지가 없었다. 화두수는 다분지 계통인 국외 수집종에서 많았다. 수량은 생육이 우수한 특성을 가진 중앙아시아와 미국에서 수집된 계통이 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 개화소요일수, 줄기직경, 분지수 및 화두수가 수량과 정의 상관관계를 보였다. 화두수와 총분지수의 직접효과가 높았으며 줄기직경, 엽수 및 2차분지수는 간접효과가 각각 컸다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashri A, Efron Y (1964) Inheritance studies with fertile inter specific hybrids of three Carthamus L. species. Crop Sci. 4:510-514 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050023x
  2. Bang KH, Kim YG, Park HW, Seong NS, Cho JH, Park SI, Kim HS (2001) Classification of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) collections by agronomic characteristics. Korean J. of Medicinal Crop Sci. 9:301-309
  3. Beech DF (1969) Safflower. Field Crop Abstracts 22:107-117
  4. 土屈田滿(1989) 세계유용식물사전. 평범사. p. 221-222
  5. Chavan VM (1961) Niger and safflower. Hyderabad: The Indian Oilseed 12. Committee. p. 150
  6. 최영전 (1994) 약초이용과 재배. 오성출판사. p. 458
  7. Claassen CE (1950) Natural and controlled crossing in safflower. Agron. J. 42 : 381-384 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1950.00021962004200080002x
  8. Dennis RE, Rubis DD (1966) Safflower production in Arizona. Bull. A-47 Ariz. Coop. Ext, Servo & Agric. Exp. Stn. P. 24
  9. 김재길 (1992) 원색천영불대사전(하). 남산당. p. 503
  10. Kim JC (2000) Major morphological characteristics of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) accessions. Korean J. Plant Resources 13:213-218
  11. Kim JH, Jean SM, An MY, Ku SK, Lee JH, Choi MS, Moon KD (1998) Effects of diet Korean safflower (Carthamus tirictorious L,) seed powder on bone trssue in rats during the recovery of rib fracture. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutri. 27:698-704
  12. Knoeles PH, Miller MD (1960) Safflower in California. Man. 26 Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. p. 23.
  13. Knoeles PH, Schank SC (1964) Artificial hybrids of Cathamus nitidus and C. tinctotius L. (Cornpositae), Crop Sci. 41:596-599
  14. Kumar H, Agrawal RK (1989) HUS 305 a high-yielding safflower variety. Indian Farming 39:17-18
  15. 이정일, 계봉명(1994) 약용식물의 이용과 신재배기술. 선진문화사. p. 399-402
  16. 약용식물연구회(1993) 신.약품식물학. 학창사. p. 384-410
  17. Purseglove JW (1978) Tropical Crops Dicotyledons. Longman. p. 54-57
  18. 농촌진흥청(1995) 삼정농사시험연구조사기준. p. 583-585
  19. Takahashi Y (1984) Tet. Lett. 25:2471 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(01)81207-7
  20. Weiss EA (1983) Oilseed crops. Longman. p. 216-281.
  21. 山口一孝 (1963) 植物成分分析法(上). 南江堂. p. 358-359.