Determining the Optimum Maintenance Period of the Steel Making Equipment Having Multiple Failure Types

다수의 고장유형을 갖는 제철설비의 최적 정비주기 산출

  • 송홍준 (광양제철소 설비기술부 정비기획팀) ;
  • 전치혁 (포항공과대학교 산업공학과)
  • Received : 20020400
  • Accepted : 20021200
  • Published : 2003.03.31

Abstract

The maintenance cost in K Steelworks has been continuously increased in proportion to the production cost. However, there seems to be a possibility of reducing cost through the optimization of maintenance actions. The failure types of the equipment in steelworks ate various with different failure cost. Thus the failure rate and cost of each type of failures should be considered simultaneously when the optimum maintenance period is to be determined. It is considered that the equipment undergoes periodic replacement and a specified number of incomplete preventive maintenance actions are performed during a replacement period. Assuming that the time to failure follows a Weibull distribution, the parameters of the failure rate are estimated using the maximum likelihood estimation. The optimal replacement period is determined to minimize the average cost per unit time. As the result of analysis it is suggested that the existing maintenance period for a hot-rolling equipment can be extended significantly.

Keywords

References

  1. 박경수(1978), 신뢰도공학 및 정비이론, 탑출판사
  2. 전치혁, 박공수, 황욱연, 주민보 (1998), '최소수리를 갖는 정기 정비정책 하에서의 고장률 추정 및 정비주기 산정 : K체철소 사례', 대한설비관리학회지, 3(1), pp.217-228
  3. Barlow, R. E., F. Proschan and L. C. Hunter (1965), Mathematical Theory of Reliability, John Wiley& Sons
  4. Bunday, B, D. (1991), Statistical Methods in Reliability Theory and Practice, Ellis Horwood
  5. Nakagawa, T. (1986), 'Periodic and Sequential Preventive Maintenance Policies', Journal of Applied Probability, 23, 536-542
  6. Nakagawa, T. and M. Kowada (1983), 'Analysis of a System with Minimal Repair and Its Application to Replacement Policy', European Journal of Operational Research, 12, 176-182
  7. Tilquin, C. and R. Cleroux (1975), Periodic Replacement with Minimal Repair at Failure and Adjustment Costs, Naval Reseacb Logistics Quarterly, 22, 243-254