대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.325-341
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

THE EFFECT OF THE BIORESORBABLE COLLAGEN MEMBRANE ON THE REGENERATION OF BONE DEFECT BY USING THE MIXTURE OF AUTOGRAFT AND XENOGRAFT BONE

  • Lee Jung-Min (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Yung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2003.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem: In cases where bony defects were present, guided bone regenerations have been performed to aid the placement of implants. Nowadays, the accepted concept is to isolate bone from soft tissue by using barrier membranes to allow room for generation of new bone. Nonresorbable membranes have been used extensively since the 1980's. However, this material has exhibited major shortcomings. To overcome these faults, efforts were made to develop resorbable membranes. Guided bone regenerations utilizing resorbable membranes were tried by a number of clinicians. $Bio-Gide^{(R)}$ is such a bioresorbable collagen that is easy to use and has shown fine clinical results. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the histological results of guided bone regenerations performed using resorbable collagen membrane($Bio-Gide^{(R)}$) with autogenous bone, bovine drived xenograft and combination of the two. Surface morphology and chemical composition was analyzed to understand the physical and chemical characteristics of bioresorbable collagen membrane and their effects on guided bone regeneration. Material and methods: Bioresorbable collagen membrane ($Bio-Gide^{(R)}$), Xenograft Bone(Bio-Oss), Two healthy, adult mongrel dogs were used. Results : 1. Bioresorbable collagen membrane is pure collagen containing large amounts of Glysine, Alanine, Proline and Hydroxyproline. 2. Bioresorbable collagen membrane is a membrane with collagen fibers arranged more loosely and porously compared to the inner surface of canine mucosa: This allows for easier attachment by bone-forming cells. Blood can seep into these spaces between fibers and form clots that help stabilize the membrane. The result is improved healing. 3. Bioresorbable collagen membrane has a bilayered structure: The side to come in contact with soft tissue is smooth and compact. This prevents soft tissue penetration into bony defects. As the side in contact with bone is rough and porous, it serves as a stabilizing structure for bone regeneration by allowing attachment of bone-forming cells. 4. Regardless of whether a membrane had been used or not, the group with autogenous bone and $Bio-Oss^{(R)}$ filling showed the greatest amount of bone fill inside a hole, followed by the group with autogenous bone filling, the group with blood and the group with $Bio-Oss^{(R)}$ Filling in order. 5. When a membrane was inserted, regardless of the type of bone substitute used, a lesser amount of resorption occurred compared to when a membrane was not inserted. 6. The border between bone substitute and surrounding bone was the most indistinct with the group with autogenous bone filling, followed by the group with autogenous bone and $Bio-Oss^{(R)}$ filling, the group with blood, and the group with $Bio-Oss^{(R)}$ filling. 7. Three months after surgery, $Bio-Gide^{(R)}$ and $Bio-Oss^{(R)}$ were distinguishable. Conclusion: The best results were obtained with the group with autogenous bone and $Bio-Oss^{(R)}$ filling used in conjunction with a membrane.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lundgren D, Sennerby L, Falk H, Friberg B, Nyman S. The use of a new bioresorbable barrier for guided bone regeneration in connection with implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:177-184 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050309.x
  2. Jovanovie SA, Spiekermann H, Richter EJ. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:233-245
  3. Burchardt, H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clinical orthopaedics and Related Research 1983;174:28-42
  4. Reddi, A.B. Cell biology and biochemistry of endochondral bone development. Coli. Relat. Research 1981; 1: 209-226
  5. Urist, M.R. Bone: Formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;150: 893-899 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3698.893
  6. Hammerle, C.H.F. & Karring. T. (1998) Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites. Periodontology 2000 17: in press
  7. Zitzmann N, Naef R, Sch rer P. Guided bone regeneration and augmentation in implant surgery, using Bio-Oss$\{circledR}$ together with the membrane technique. Dtsch Zahnarzil Z 1996;6:1-7
  8. Stuart AK, Wisner-Lynch L, Marxer M, Lynch S. Guided bone regeneration: Integration of a resorbable membrane and a bone graft material. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:185-194
  9. Merete Aaboe, Soren Schou, Erik Hjorting-Hansen, Mogens Helbo. Osseointegration of subperiosteal implants using bovine bone substitute and various membranes. Clinical Oral Implants Res 2000: 11:51-58
  10. Murphy K. Postoperative healing complication associated with Gore-Tex periodonatla material. Part I. Incidence and characterization. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15:363-375
  11. Caffesse, R., Nasjleti, CI, Morrison, E. & Sanchez, R. (1994) Guided tissue regeneration: comparison of absorbable and non absorbable membrane. Histologic and histometric study in dogs. Journal of periodontol 65: 583-591
  12. Mellonig J, Triplett Re. Guided tissue regeneration and endosseous dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993;13:109-119
  13. Hurzeler MB, Strub JR. Guided bone regeneration around exposed implants: A new bioresorbable device and bioresorbable memebrane pins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7(9):37-47
  14. Lundgren D, Laurell L, Gottlow J, Rylander H, Mathisen T, Nyman S, Rask M. The influence of the design of two different bioresorbable barriers on the results of guided tissue regeneration therapy. An intra-individual comparative study in the monkey. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 605-612 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.7.605
  15. Francisco H. Nociti Jr,. Maria Angela N, Machado CM, Stefani EA, Sallum AW. Absorbable versus nonabsorbgable membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of ligature=induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs. Part I. A clinical investigation. Clinical Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:113-120
  16. Greenstein G, Caton JG. Biodegradable barriers and guided tissue regeneration. Periodontology 2000 1993;1:36-45 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00205.x
  17. Hurzeler MB, Kohal RS, Mota LF, Nagsbandi J, Caffesse RG. Evaluation of a new bioresorbable barrier to facilitate guided bone regeneration around exposed implant threads. An experimental study in the monkey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implantscsuomitted for publication)
  18. Schlegel AK, Mohler H, Busch F, Mehl A. Preclinical and clinical studies of a collagen membrane(Bio-Gide). Biomaterials 1997 Apr;18(7):535-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00175-5
  19. Santarelli G, Parodi R, Carusi G. The use of a slowly resorbable collagen barrier in the regeneration of bone in deep wide defects: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16(1):68-77
  20. Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL. Collagen membrane: a review. J Periodontol 2001; 72(2):215-29 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.215
  21. Wang HL, O'Neal RB, MacNeil LM. Regenerative treatment of periodontal defects utilizing a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7(5):59-66
  22. DeLustro F, Dasch J, Keefe J, Ellingsworth L. Immune responses to allogenic and xenogenic implants of collagen and collagen derivatives. Clin Orthop 1990;263-79
  23. Schwartmann M. Use of collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration. Implant Dent 2000;9(1):63-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009010-00011
  24. Ziccardi VB, Buchbinder D. Guided tissue regeneration in dentistry. N Y state Dent J 1996;62(10):48-51
  25. Meade KR, Silver FH. Immunogenicity of collagenous implants. Biomaterials 1990; 11(3):176-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(90)90151-F
  26. Goissis G, Marcantonio E Jr, Marcantonio RA, Lia RC, Cancian DC, de Carvalho WM. Biocompatibility studies of anionc collagen membranes with different degree of glutaraldehyde cross-linking. Biomaterials 1999;20(1):27-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00198-1
  27. Owens KW, Yukna RA. Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study. Implant Dent 2001;10(1):49-58 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200101000-00016
  28. Parodi R SantarelliG, Carusi G. Application of slowresorbing collagen membrane to periodontal and peri-implant guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16(2):174-85
  29. Burns WT, Peacock ME, Cuenim MF, Hokett SD. Gingival recession treatment using a bilayer collagen membrane. J Periodontol 2000;71(8):1328-52
  30. Wenz B., Peetz M, Safety of natural bone substiiuies., Vol.12, No.3, 2001
  31. Wenz B., Oesch B., HorstM. Anaysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform enchphalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone. Biomaterials 2001; 22:1599-1606 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00312-4
  32. Benke D., Olah A., Moehler H. Protein-chemical analysis of Bio-Oss and evidence on its carbonate contents. Biomaterials 2001;22:1005-1012 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00323-9
  33. Peetz M, Philip J. Boyne. Characterization of xenogeneic bone material In : Osseous Reconstruction of the Maxilla and the Mandible. Quintessens Co. Inc., Chicago 1997;87-100
  34. Weibrich G., Trettin R, Gnoth S.,Gotz H.,Wagner W. Analysis of the size of specific surface area of bone regeneration materials by gas adsorption. Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir, art 2000;156:1-5
  35. http://www.geistlich.com/bilmaterials/en/ dental/products.(cited 2002.8.7)
  36. Hising P., Bolin A., Branting Ch. Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:90-97
  37. Artzi Z., Nemcovsky C, Tal H. Efficacy of porous bovine mineral in various types of osseous deficiences: clinical observations and literature review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:395-405
  38. Artzi Z. Coronal ridge augmentation in the absence of bilateral bony plate around a pathologically denuded implant surface. Clin Oral Implants Research 2000;20:1015-1023
  39. McAllister MS, Margolin MD., Cogan AG. Eighteenmonth Radiographic and histologid Evaluation of sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone in the chimpanzee. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:361-368
  40. Hockers T., Abensur D.,Valentini P., Legrand R, Hammerle CH. The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants - A study in beagle dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Res 1999;10:487-498 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100607.x
  41. Houser B., Mellonig J., Brunsvold M., Cochran D., Meffert R., Alder M. Clinical evaluation of anorganic bone xenograft with a bioabsorbable collagen barrier in the treatment of molar furcation defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:161-169
  42. Kay SA., Wisne L., Marxer M. Guided bone regeneration: Integration of a resorbable membrane and a bone graft material. Pract Periodont 1997:9(2)
  43. Wenz B. Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide : Development of resorbable membranes for bone regeneration. Symposium 'Different treatmentoptionsfor boneregeneration' Zurich, 1995.4.June