References
- Branemark PI. Breine U, Lindstrom J, Adell R, Hansson BO, Ohlsson A. Intra-os-seous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
-
Adell R, Lekhilm U, RockIer B, Br
${\aa}$ nemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4 -
Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Br
${\aa}$ nemark P-I, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the totally edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1990;5:347-359 - Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Erbom LI, Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 1988:59:287-296
- Kopp CD. Branemark osseointegration prognosis and treatment rationale. Dent Clin North Am 1989;33:701-731
-
Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Br
${\aa}$ nemark fixtures in type iv bone. A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:24 - Saadoun AP, LeGall ML. Clinical results and guidelines on Steri-Oss endosseous implants. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;12:487-499
- Tolman DE. Reconstructive procedures with endosseous implants in grafted bone: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:275-394
- Friberg B. Bone quality evaluation during implant placement. Academic dissertation for the degree of master of dental science. University of G thenburg, G thenburg. Sweden, 1994
- Ivanoff C-J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of mono and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants. A study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:229-235 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80036-1
- Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I. Jorneus L, The Wide Fixture: A Solution for Special Bone Situations and a Rescue for the Compromised Implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:400-408
- Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C., Rangert B, Lerholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants: An experimental study in rabbits. Int. J. Oral Maillofac. Surg. 1997;26:141-148
- Jarvis WC. Biomechanical advantages of wide diameter implants. Compend Cintin Educ Dent 1997;18(7):687-692
- Ivanoff CJ, Grodahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of Variations in Implant Diameters: A 3-to 5-year Retrospective Clinical Report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:173-180
- Eckert SE, Meraw SJ. Early Experience with Wide-Platform Mk ii Implants Part I : Implants Survival. Part ii : Evaluation of Risk Factors Involving Implant Survival. lnt Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:208-216
- Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implant in the rabbit. A one year follow up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:69-75
- Carlsson L, R stlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torque for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-24
- Tjellstrom A, Jacobsson M, Albrektsson T. Removal torque of osseointegrated craniofacial implants: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:287-289
- Hirofumi Kidc, Eloy E, Schulz, Ajay Kumar, Jaime Lozada, Subrata Saha. Implant diameter and bone density: Effect on initial stability and pull-out resistance. Journal of Oral Implantogy 1997;23:163-169
- Albrektsson A, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Proth Dent 1987;57:597-607 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
- Sennerby L, Thomson P. Ericson L. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:62-71
- Johansson C, Chong Hyun Han, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. A Quantitative Comparison of Machined Commercially Pure Titanium and Titanium Aluminum-Vanadium Implants in Rabbit Bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1998;13:315-321
- Aparicio C, Orozco P. Use of 5-mm-diameter implants: Periotest values related to a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:398-406 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090605.x
- Tawil G, Mawla M, Gottlow J. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the 5-mm Diameter Regular-Platform Branemark fixture: 2- to 5-year follow-up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Res 2002;4:16-26 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00147.x
- Kim YB, Han CH. Clinical study of wide implant system. The Jounal of Korean Acamemy of Oral&Maxillo implantology 2001;5:15-28
-
Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Br
${\aa$ nemark dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-146 -
Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Br
${\aa}$ nemark fixures in type iv bone. A 5-year analysis. J Periodontal 1991;62:24 - Eriksson, RA. Heat-induced bone tissue injury. An in vivo investigation of heat tolerance of bone tissue and temperature rise in the drilling of cortical bone. Thesis, University of G thenburg, Sweden. 1984
- Eriksson, RA., Albrektsson T. The effect of heat on bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:705-711 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90417-8
- English C, Bahat O. Langer B, Sheets CG. What are the clinical limitation of wide diameter (4mm or greater) root-form endosseus implants? Int J Oral&Maxillofac implants 2000;15(2):293-296
- Renouard F, Riachi F. Apport des implants de 5-mm de diameter en implantoligie oral. Implantoligie 1994;24:2069-2076