DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effective Factors of n Foam Generation Using Foam Condensate

포말 농축물에 의한 포말 생성의 영향인자

  • SUH Kuen-Hack (Department of Chemical Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • SHIN Jeong-Sik (Department of Chemical Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • LEE Ju-Hwa (Department of Chemical Engineering, Pukyong National University)
  • 서근학 (부경대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 신정식 (부경대학교 화학공학과) ;
  • 이주화 (부경대학교 화학공학과)
  • Published : 2003.10.01

Abstract

We performed the experiment to determine the effective factors, such as the initial concentration of protein, pore size of air distributor, SAV (superficial air velocity), pH, salts and temperature related to foaming characteristics. The foam height in a foam generator was increased with the increase of the initial protein concentration and the decrease of pore size. As SAV was increased, the foam height was increased, and the optimum SAV was 0.84 cm/sec. The foam height was highest in the acid region and it was increased with the increase of salt concentration of NaCl and $NaHCO_3.$ The removal efficiencies of TSS (total suspended solid) and turbidity decreased with the increase of the initial protein concentration in the batch foam separator.

Keywords

References

  1. APHA, AWWA and WPCF. 1992. Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wasterwater. 16th ed. American Public Health Association, pp. 132-133
  2. Bhattacharjee, S., R. Kumar and K. Gandhi. 2001. Modeling of protein mixture seperation in a batch foam column. Chem. Engineer. Sci., 56, 5499-5510 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00156-7
  3. Brown, A.K., Kaul, A and J. Varley. 1999. Continous foaming for protein recovery, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 62(3), 278-290 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990205)62:3<278::AID-BIT4>3.0.CO;2-D
  4. Chen, S. 1994. Modeling surfactant removal in foam fractionation: II Experimental investigations, Aquacult. Engineer., 13, 183-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8609(94)90002-7
  5. Chen, S., D. Stechy and R.F. Malone. 1996. Suspended solids control in recirculating aquaculture systems. In: Aquaculture water reuse system: Engineering design and management, Timmons, M.B. and T.M. Losordo eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 61-100
  6. Cho, D. and H.N. Chang. 1999. Separation of oil Contaminants by surfactant-aided foam fractionation, Kor. J. Chem. Engineer., 15, 445-448
  7. Clarke, A.N. and D.J. Wilson. 1983. Foam Flotation Theory and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 418
  8. Lomax, K.M. 1976. Nitrification with water pretreatment on a closed cycle catfish culture system. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. USA
  9. Lowry, O.H., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr and R.J. Randall. 1951. Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. J. Biotech., 193, 265-275
  10. Noble, M. and J. Varley. 1998. Protein recovery using gas-liquid dispersion, J. Chromatogr., 711, 31-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(98)00030-9
  11. Saleh, Z.S. and M.M. Hossain. 2001. A study of the seperation of proteins from multicomponent mixtures by a semi-batch foaming process. Chem. Engineer. Process, 40, 371-378 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(01)00115-5
  12. Suh, K.H., B.J. Kim and S.K. Kim. 2001. The removal of aquacultural waste by foam seperator from sea water. J. Kor. Inst. Chem. Engineer., 39(2), 237-244
  13. Suh, K.H., H.K. Shim and J.W. Yun. 1996. Continuous foam separation of yeast cells. Kor. J. Biotechnol. Bioengineer., 11, pp. 46
  14. Suzuki, Y. and T. Maruyama. 2002. Removal of suspended solids by coagulation and foam separation using surface-active protein. Water Res., 36, 2195-2203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00439-0
  15. Wong, C.H., M.M. Hossain and C.E. Davies. 2001. Performance of a continuous foam separation column as a function of process variables, Biopro. and Biosys. Engineer., 24, 73-81 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004490100225