Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.179-186
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 1975-8375(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-4521(eISSN)
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine)
권호 표지

예방의학회지 게재 원저논문의 영문초록 질 개선의 평가

Assessment on Quality Improvement of the Abstracts of the Original Research Articles in the Korean Journal of preventive Medicine

  • 박준호 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 예방의학교실 및 직업의학연구소) ;
  • 이화순 (연세대학교 보건환경대학원) ;
  • 박종구 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 예방의학교실 및 직업의학연구소) ;
  • 차봉석 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 예방의학교실 및 직업의학연구소) ;
  • 김춘배 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 예방의학교실 및 직업의학연구소)
  • Park, Jun-Ho (Department of Preventive Medicine and Institute of Occupational Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hwa-Soon (Yonsei Graduate School of Health & Environment) ;
  • Park, Jong-Ku (Department of Preventive Medicine and Institute of Occupational Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Cha, Bong-Suk (Department of Preventive Medicine and Institute of Occupational Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chun-Bae (Department of Preventive Medicine and Institute of Occupational Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2003.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives : To compare the quality improvement of the abstracts of original articles, according to the revised manuscript format, of the Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine (Korean J Pre Med) was adopted in 1999. Methods : A total 63 abstracts for 1997, and 49 for 2001, were selected as the original articles from the Kor J Pre Med. This study was carried out by the separate-sample pretest-posttest design. The quality of the abstracts was measured by a checklist of Narine' evaluation criteria, and the other information related to the articles were also surveyed by e-mail and fax or telephone using a self-made Questionnaire, From the response rate, a total of 62 abstracts for 1997 and 49 for 2901 were finally analyzed. Results : The mean number of words in an abstract decreased from 285 in 1997, to 250 by 2001. The mean number of key words per abstract decreased from 3.9 in 1997, to 3.6 by 2001. The mean number of inappropriate usage of key words per abstract, by the MeSH standard, decreased from 1.9 in 1997, to 0.4 by 2001 Also, the overall mean score of abstract quality increased from 0.54 in 1997 to 0.61 by 2001. The range of scores for the abstract quality was better in 2001 ($0.40{\sim}0.77$) than in 1997 ($0.20{\sim}0.81$). From the multiple regression analyses of the 1997 and 2001 databases, the intervention of the manuscript format's revision, and the number of English words to the quality score of the .abstract, were the only statistically significant factors, Conclusions : In conclusion, the quality of abstracts in the Kor J Pre Med has improved since the revised manuscript format was adopted in 1999. The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine will continuously recommend proposals for more informative abstracts in their journal, and will evaluate the abstracts' content with quality criteria. Future studies should address these issues, and compare the quality of abstracts between different international and domestic journals.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김춘배,강명근，고상열，박종구. 예방의학회지 투고 논문의 질적 수준 평가.' 97 대한 예방의학회창립 50주년기념 추계학술대회연제집(대한예방의학회) 1997: 258-259
  2. Kim CB, Rhee JA, Park JK, Sohn SJ. Trends of Preventive Medicine Research according to The Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine and Qualitative Meta-analysis on Articles of Lead Poisoning. Korean J Prev Med 1999; 32(2): 113-122 (Korean)
  3. 유승흠. 예방의학의 역사적 전개. 예방의학회지 1998; 31(2，부록): 53-65
  4. 박찬규. 국내의학학술지 2차 평가. 대한 의학학술지 편집인 협의회 소식 1998;8: 2-9
  5. 조수헌. 예방의학회지 편집 개선방안. 1999년 대한예방의학회 동계 학술심포지움 연제집 1999
  6. 조수헌. 예방의학회지 게재 원고의 동향. 2000년 대한예방의학회 하계 워크샵 및 전공의 연수교육집 2000: 17-24
  7. Bernier CL, Yerkey AN. Cogent commu-nication: Overcoming Information Over-load. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press; 1979: 39
  8. Warren KS. Selective aspects of the biomedical literature. In: Warren KS, ed. Coping with the Biomedical Literature: A Primer for the Scientist and the Clinitian. New York: Praeger Publishers; 1981: 17-30
  9. Cuddy PG, Elenbaas RM, Elenbaas JK. Evaluating the medical literature: Part I. Abstract, introduction, methods. Ann Emerg Med 1983; 12: 549-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(83)80296-0
  10. Ad Hoc Working. Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106(4): 598-604
  11. Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts [L]. Ann Intern Med 1987; 107: 790-1
  12. Mulrow CD, Thacker SB, Pugh JA. A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108(4): 613-615 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-108-4-613
  13. Forrow L, Arnold RM. Abstracting nonquantitative data [L]. J Gen Intern Med 1989; 4: 267
  14. LeBlond RF. Improving structured abstracts [L]. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111: 764
  15. Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113(1): 69-76 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-69
  16. Huth EJ. Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 626-7 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-626
  17. Levy N. Structured abstracts. NLM Tech-nical Bulletin 1988; 235: 10
  18. Lock S. Structured abstracts [E]. BMJ 1988; 297: 156 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6642.156
  19. More informative abstracts [E]. J Gen Intern Med 1989; 4: 76 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596498
  20. Squires BP. Structured abstracts. Can Med Assoc J 1990; 142: 703
  21. Squires BP. Structured abstracts of original research and review articles [E]. Can Med Assoc J 1990; 143: 619-622
  22. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts' submitted to biomedical journals ((국제의학학술지 편집인위원회. '생 의학 학술지에 투고하는 원고의 통일 양식' 으로 번역). Ann Intern Med 1997; 126(1): 36-47 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-1-199701010-00006
  23. 민양기. 의학논문의 심사평가. 학술논문 심사에 관한 pannel 토의 연제집 (대한의학학술지편집인협의회) 1998
  24. 임정기. 게재거부된 논문의 특정. 학술논문 심사에 관한 pannel 토의 연제집 (대한의학학술지편집인협의회) 1998
  25. 임정기. 거부되는 원고 및 초록 작성법. 2000년 대한예방의학회 하계 워크샵 및 전공의 연수교육집 2000: 11-16
  26. Park JK, Kim CB, Hannibal D. Quality Assessment of The Abstracts of The Original Articles (1997) in The Korean Jouranl of Preventive Medicine. Korean J Prev Med 1999; 32(1): 72-79 (Korean)
  27. Campbell D, Stanley J. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College; 1963
  28. 이지훈. 사회과학의 메타분석방법론. 충북대학교 출판부;1993, (302쪽)
  29. Narine L, Yee DS, Einarson TR, Ilersich AL. Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989. Can Med Assoc J 1991; 144(4): 449-453
  30. Taddio A, Pain T, Fassos FF, Boon H, llersich AL, Einarson TR. Quality of non-structured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. CMAJ 1994; 150: 1611-1615
  31. Wilczynski NL, Walker CJ, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. Preliminary assessment of the effect of more informative (structured) abstracts on citation retrieval from MED-LINE. Medinfo 1995; 8(pt.2): 1457-1461
  32. Trakas K, Addis A, Kruk D, Buczek Y, Iskedjian M, Einarson TR. Quality assessment of pharmacoeconomic abstracts of original research articles in selected jour-nals. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31: 423-428 https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809703100406
  33. Purcell GP, Rennels GD, Shortliffe EH. Development and evaluation of a context-based document representation for searching the medical literature. Inter-national Journal of on Digital Libraries 1997; 17:288-296
  34. Winker MA. The need for concrete impro-vement in abstract quality. JAMA 1999; 281(12): 1129-1130 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.12.1129