Customer's Intention to Use Hospital-based Health Promotion Services

병원건강증진서비스에 대한 의료소비자의 이용의도

  • Hahm, Myung-Il (K-RBRVS Research & Planning Team, Research Institute for Healthcare Policy, Korean Medical Association) ;
  • Kang, Myung-Geun (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Choon-Sun (Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Woo-Hyun (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine. Yonsei University)
  • 함명일 (대한의사협회 의료정책연구소 상대가치연구기획단) ;
  • 강명근 (조선대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 박춘선 (연세대학교 대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 조우현 (연세대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

Objective : To determine the relationships between customer's attitude, the subjective norm and the intention to use hospital-based health promotion services. Methods : This study was based on the theory of reasoned action, suggested by Fishbein and Ajzen. The subjects of this study were 501 residents of Seoul, Bun-dang, Il-san and Pyung-chon city, under 65 years, who were stratified by sex and age. A covariance structural analysis was used to identify the structural relationships between attitude towards health promotion programs or services, their subjective norm and their intention to use the aforementioned services. Results : The subjective norm for using the health promotion programs or services provided by hospitals was a significant predictor of the intention to use, but the attitude towards the services was not significant Conclusions : Our results suggest that a customer's reference group affects their use of the hospital-based health promotion services. Because the subjects of this study were restricted to specific urban areas, there are limitations to generalizing the study results. Despite the limitations of these results, they can serve as baseline information for the understanding of consumers behavior toward hospital-based health promotion services.

Keywords

References

  1. 제니 나이두,제인 윌스(지역보건연구회 옮김). 건강증진 -이론과 실제-. 계축문화사, 2001
  2. Rhonda G, Bridget H, Chris B. Asia and Western Pacific Approaches to Health Promotion. in Bracht N.(Ed.) Health Promotion at the Community Level. Sage Publication, Inc. Thousand Oaks, California, 1999
  3. DeccacheA, Libion F, CanghCV, Dumont J, Collignon JL, Borgs M. Promoting Health in Health Care Organizations and Hospital : A Survey in French Speaking BelgianHospitals. Promotion & Education 1999; IV: 25-35
  4. Pelikan JM,Garcia-Barbero M, Lobnig H, Krajik K(Ed.). Pathways to a Health Promoting Hospital; Experiences from the European Pilot Project 1993-1997 (Health Promoting Hospital Series Vol. I). Health Promotion Publication, Gamburg Germany, 1998
  5. Bonk DJ, Bensky JH Current Involvement of Hospital in Health Promotion. in Sol N, Wilson PK Hospital Health Promotion. Human Kinetic Books,Champaign, 1989
  6. Olden PC, Clement DG. The prevalence of hospital health promotion and disease prevention services: good news, bad news, and policy implications'. Milbank Q 2000; 78(1): 115-146 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00163
  7. Aguiar CA. Overall Benefits of Health Promotion to Hospital. in Sol N., Wilson P.K. Hospital Health Promotion. Human Kinetic Books,Champaign, 1989
  8. 김용익. 21 세 기 보건의료의 방향 - 형평을 강화하는 방향으로 -. 1998년도 한국보건행정학회 제20차 전기학술대회 연제집,1998. 6
  9. 배상수. 도시지역 건강증진 사업의 발전방향. 건강보장연구 1999; 3: 35-64
  10. 연세대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실. 병원중심의 건강증진 활성화 방안 연구(연구보고서). 2001. 6
  11. Bensky JM. Marketing and selling hospital-based health promotion. Human Kinetics Books, 1989
  12. 이문규,홍성태. 소비자행동의 이해. 법문사, 2002
  13. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth, 1993 pp 168-176
  14. MontanoDE, Kasprzyk D, Taplin SH. The Theory of Reasoned Actionand the Theory of Planned Behavior. in Glanz K, Lewis PM, Rimer BK.(Ed.) Health Behavior and Health Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1997
  15. Levin PF. Test of the Fishbein and Ajzen Models as Predictors of Health Care Workers' Glove Use. Res Nurs Health 1999; 22: 295-307 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199908)22:4<295::AID-NUR4>3.0.CO;2-N
  16. O' Callaghan FV, Callan VJ, Baglioni A. Cigarette use by adolescents: attitude-behavior relationships. Subst Use Misuse 1999; 34(3): 455-468 https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089909035656
  17. Arvola A, Lahteenmaki L. Tuorila H. Predicting the Intent to Purchase Un-familiar and FamiliarCheeses: The Effects of Attitudes, Expected Liking and Food Neophobia. Appetite 1999; 32: 113-126 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1998.0181
  18. Wallace KG, Koeppel K, Senko A, Stawiaz K, Thomas C, and Kosar K. Effect of attitudes and subjective norms on intention to provide oral care to patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy. Cancer Nurs 1997 Feb; 20(1):34-41 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-199702000-00005
  19. Trafimow D, Trafimow JH. Predicting back pain sufferers' intentions to exercise. J Psychol 1998; 132(6): 581-592 https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599291
  20. Sutton S, McVey D, Glanz A. A com-parative test of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of condom use intentions in national sample of English young people.Health Psychol 1999; 18(1): 72-81 https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.72
  21. Albarracin D, Johnson BT, Fishbein M, Muellerleile PA. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2001; 127(1): 142-161 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142
  22. O' Callaghan FV, Chang DC, Callan VJ, Baglioni A. Models of alcohol use by young adults: an examination of various attitude-behavior theories. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58(5): 502-7 https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1997.58.502
  23. Brewer JL, Blake AJ, Rankin SA, Douglass LW. Theory of Reasoned Action predicts milk consumption in women. J Am Diet Assoc 1999; 99(1): 39-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00012-7
  24. Mesters I, Oostveen T. Why do adolescents eat low nutrient snacks between meals? An analysis of behavioral determinants with the Fishbein and Ajzen model. Nutr Health 1994; 10(1): 33-47 https://doi.org/10.1177/026010609401000104
  25. Baker SA, Morrison DM, Carter WB, Verdon MS. Using the theory of reasoned action(TRA) to understand the decision to use condoms in an STD clinic population. Health Educ Q 1996; 23(4): 528-542 https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819602300411
  26. Gaither CA, Bagozzi RP, Ascione FJ, Kirking DM. The determinants of physi-cian attitudes and subjective norms toward drug information sources: modification and test of the theory of reasoned action. Pharm Res 1997; 14(10): 1298-1308 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012143915886
  27. Grogan SC, Bell R, Conner M. Eating Sweet Snacks: Gender Differences in Attitudes and Behaviour. Appetite 1997; 28: 19-31 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1996.0067
  28. Sol S, Wilson PK. Hospital health pro-motion. Human Kinetics Books.1989
  29. Smith RA, Biddle SJH. Attitudes and exercise adherence: Test of Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behaviour. J Sports Sci 1999: 17: 269-281 https://doi.org/10.1080/026404199365993
  30. Lee SH, Cho HS. Factors related to the health behavior of urban residents on the basis of theory of reasoned action. Korean J Prev Med 1999; 32(2): 183-190(Korean)
  31. Cho BJ. A comparative study on the roles, structures, and relationships among deter-minant factors of buyer purchasing behavior. Management Economy 1982; 14: 161-75 (Korean)
  32. Fishbein M, and Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 1975
  33. Choi KS, Cho WH, Lee SH, Nam JM. Structural modeling of quality, satisfaction, value and purchase intention in health care service. Korean J Prev Med 2000; 33(4): 426-435(Korean)
  34. Kim JY. Analysis on medical utility according to lifestyle. Master thesis Yonsei University, 1998 (Korean)
  35. 조우현,이선희,이해종,전기홍. 의료서비스 마케팅. 퇴설당,1999
  36. Kotler P, and Armsrong G. Principles of Marketing, 4th ed. Prentice Hall. 1990
  37. Park HS. Relationships among attitudes and subjective norms: testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures. Communi-cation Studies 2000; 51(2): 162-175