Stress Corrosion Cracking of Alloy 600 and Alloy 690 in Caustic Solution

  • Published : 2003.04.01

Abstract

Stress corrosion cracking of Alloy 600 and Alloy 690 has been studied with a C-ring specimen in 1%, 10% and 40% NaOH at $315^{\circ}C$. SCC test was performed at 200 mV above corrosion potential. Initial stress on the apex of C-ring specimen was varied from 300 MPa to 565 MPa. Materials were heat treated at various temperatures. SCC resistance of Ni-$_\chi$Cr-10Fe alloy increased as the Cr content of the alloy increased if the density of an intergranular carbide were comparable. SCC resistance of Alloy 600 increased in caustic solution as the product of coverage of an intergranular carbide in grain boundary, intergranular carbide thickness and Cr concentration at grain boundary increased. Low temperature mill annealed Alloy 600 with small grain size and without intergranular carbide was most susceptible to SCC. TT Alloy 690 was most resistant to SCC due to the high value of the product of coverage of an intergranular carbide in grain boundary, intergranular carbide thickness and Cr concentration at grain boundary. Dependency of SCC rate on stress and NaOH concentration was obtained.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : MOST

References

  1. J. P. N. Paine, S. A. Hobart, and S. G. Sawochka, in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems- Water Reactors, Monterey, CA, 1991, p.739
  2. C. Goffin, J. Jadot, and L. Duvivier, in Proceedings of International Symposium Fontevraud IV, Fontevraud France, 1998, p.441
  3. P.M. Scott and P.Combrade, in Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-WaterReactors, Amelia Island, FL,1997, p.65
  4. Korea Instutute of Nuclear Safety, Actions for Steam generator Tube IGSCC in YoungKwang Unit 4, 2001
  5. W. Staehle, Basis for Predicting the Earliest Penetrations due to SCC for Alloy 600 on the Secondary Side of PWR Steam Generators, Presented at Seminar at KAERI, Korea, 2001
  6. J. K. Sung, J. Koch, T. Angeliu, and G. S. Was, Metall. Trans.A, 23A, 2887 (1992)
  7. R. J. Jacko, in Corrosion Evaluation of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Tubing in Primary and Faulted Secondary Water Environments, EPRI NP-6721-ISD, 1990
  8. L. E. Murr, Interfacial Phenomena in a Metals and Alloys, Addison Wesley Publishing Company 1975, p.145
  9. P. Lin, G. Palumbo, U. Erb, and K. T. Aust, Scripta Metallurgical Materialia, 33(9), 1387 (1995)
  10. P. E. Doherty, D. M. Doyle, j. M. Sarver, and B. P. Miglin, in Proceedings of a Conf. on Control of Corrosion on the Secondary Side of Steam Generators, Airlie, Virginia, USA, 1995 p.401
  11. D. C. Crawford and G. S. Was, Met. Trans. A, 23A(4), 1195 (1992)
  12. K. Yamanaka and J. Murayama, in Proc. of the 4th Intern. Symp. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Georgia, USA, 1989, p.5
  13. F. Vaillant, E-M Pavageau, M, Bouchcourt, J-M Boursier, and P. Lemaire, in Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Amelia Island, FL, 1997, p.679
  14. PWR Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines Revision Committee, PWR Secondary Water Chemistry Guidelines - Revision 3, EPRI TR-102134, Revision 3, 1993
  15. R. Bandy and D. van Rooyen, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 86, 49 (1985)
  16. T. Yonezawa, N. Sagaguri, and K, Inimura, in Proceedings of JAIF International Conference in Water Chemistry in Nuclear Power Plants, Tokyo, Japan, 1988, p.490