Multiple Attempts at Embryo Transfer do not Adversely Affect In-vitro Fertilization Pregnancy Rates: Related Mucus Contamination

반복 배아 이식이 임신율에 미치는 영향: 이식관의 점액 유무

  • Jung, Byeong-Jun (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Women's Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Sik (Infertility Center, Seoul Women's Hospital) ;
  • Kwon, Cheo-Jin (Infertility Center, Seoul Women's Hospital) ;
  • Ryu, Mi-Jin (Infertility Center, Seoul Women's Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Sin (Infertility Center, Seoul Women's Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Eun-Hee (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Women's Hospital) ;
  • Sim, Jong-Ok (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Women's Hospital) ;
  • Song, Hyun-Jin (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Women's Hospital) ;
  • Oh, Ik-Hwan (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul Women's Hospital)
  • 정병준 (인천 서울여성병원 산부인과) ;
  • 김종식 (인천 서울여성병원 불임센터) ;
  • 권처진 (인천 서울여성병원 불임센터) ;
  • 유미진 (인천 서울여성병원 불임센터) ;
  • 김명신 (인천 서울여성병원 불임센터) ;
  • 강은희 (인천 서울여성병원 산부인과) ;
  • 심종옥 (인천 서울여성병원 산부인과) ;
  • 송현진 (인천 서울여성병원 산부인과) ;
  • 오익환 (인천 서울여성병원 산부인과)
  • Published : 2003.03.30

Abstract

Objective : We investigate the effects of multiple attempts of embryo transfer because of retained embryos in the catheter and of contaminated mucus on the transferred catheter. Materials and Methods: We respectively analysed data between November 1998 and August 2002 from 305 patients of 369 cycles who underwent IVF-ET. Of these patients, 47 patients of 50 cycles (Group 2) were required multiple trial of embryo transfer. They were compared with an age-matched control groups (Group 1) with female factor infertility. Pearson's $?^2$ and Fisher's tests were used to compare proportions between discrete variables. Noncategorical data were compared using t-test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Embryos were significantly more likely to be retained when catheter was contaminated with mucus (Group 1: 22.4%; Group 2: 44.0%). The clinical pregnancy rates, however, for the contaminated mucus or not, were 46.8%, 43.5% respectively. There was no significant difference clinical pregnancy rate between those who had all their embryos transferred at the first attempt (45.4%) and those who required more than one attempt (48.0%). Conclusions: Contaminated mucus in the catheter is associated with failed embryo transferred at the first attempt. Embryo transfers, however, that are repeated attempts do not adversely affect pregnancy rates following IVF-ET.

Keywords

References

  1. Visser DS, Fourie FLER, Kruger HF. Multiple at -tempts at the embryo transfer: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer program. J Assit Reprod Genet 1993; 10: 37-43 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204438
  2. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Amin YM. Dummy embryo transfer using methylene blue dye. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1257-9 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138690
  3. Schoolcraft WB, Surrey ES, Gardner DK. Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success. Fertil Steril 2001; 76: 863-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02731-5
  4. Wisanto A, Janssen R, Deschacht J, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 72-84
  5. Nabi A, Awonuga A, Birch H, Barlow S, Stewart B. Multiple attempts at the embryo transfer: does this affect in-vitro fertilization treatment outcome? Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1188-90
  6. Tur-kaspa I, Yuval Y, Bider D, Levron J, Shulman A, Dor J. Difficult or repeated sequential embryo transfers do not adversely affect in-vitro fertilization pregnancy rates or outcome. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:2452-5 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.9.2452
  7. Jung BJ, Song HJ, Oh IH. Can endometriosis affect the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing IVFET? Korea J Fertil Steril 2002; 29: 223-7
  8. World Health Organization. Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm cervical mucus interaction. 3rd ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; 1992
  9. Veeck LL. Preembryo grading: In atlas of the human oocyte and early embryo conceptus. Vol 2, Baltimore Baltimore:Williams and Wilkins 1991; 121-49
  10. Tomas C, Tikkinen K, Tuomivaara L, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2632-5 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.10.2632
  11. Lass A, Abusheikha N, Brinsden P, Kovacs GT. The effect of a difficult embryo transfer on the outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2417 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.9.2417
  12. Wood EG, Batzer FR, Go KJ, Gutmann JN, Corson SL. Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 107-12 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.1.107
  13. Burke LM, Davenport AT, Russell GB, Deaton JL. Predictors of success after embryo transfer: experience from a single provider. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1001-4 https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.105398
  14. Woolcott R, Stanger J. Potentially important variables identified by transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 963-6 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.5.963
  15. Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J, Maguiness SD. Embryo transfer-can we learn any thing new from the observation of junctional zone contractions? Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1536-40
  16. Kovacs GT. What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 590-2
  17. Goudas VT, Hammitt DG, Damario MA, Session DR, Singh AP, et al. Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 878-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00315-X
  18. Egbase PE, al-Sharhan M, al-Othman S, al-Mutawa M, Udo EE, Grudzinskas JG. Incidence of microbial growth from the tip of the embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer in relation to clinical pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1687-9 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019470
  19. Fanchin R, Harmas A, Benaoudia F, Lundkvist U, Olivennes F, Frydman R. Microbial flora of the cervix assessed at the time of embryo transfer adversely affects in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 866-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00277-5
  20. McNamee P, Huang T, Carwile A. Significant increase in pregnancy rates achieved by vigorous irrigation of endocervical mucus prior to embryo transfer with a Wallace catheter in an IVF-ET program (abstract). Fertil Steril 1998; 70 Suppl 1: S228
  21. Glass KB, Green CA, Fluker MR, Schoolcraft WB, McNamee PI, Meldrum D. Multicenter randomized trial of cervical irrigation at the time of embryo transfer (Abstract). Fertil Steril 2000; 74 Suppl 1: S31
  22. Waterstone J, Curson R, Parsons J. Embryo transfer to low uterine cavity. Lancet 1991; 337: 1413
  23. Yovich JL, Turner SR, Murphy AJ. Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 318-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)48854-0
  24. Nazari A, Askari HA, Check JH, O'Shaughnessy A. Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancy in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 919-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56297-9
  25. Coroleu B, Carreras O, Veiga A, Martell A, Martinez F, Belil I, et al. Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2001; 15: 616-20 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.3.616