착상전 배아의 분리된 할구에서 중기염색체 상을 획득하기 위한 효율적인 방법의 개발에 대한 연구: 미세소관 형성 저해제의 효과

Development of an Efficient Method for Obtaining Metaphase Chromosomes in Individual Blastomeres of Mouse and Human Preimplantaion Embryos: Effect of Microtubule Depolymerizing Agents

  • 임천규 (삼성제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 민동미 (삼성제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 이형송 (삼성제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실) ;
  • 김진영 (성균관대학교 의과대학 산부인과학교실) ;
  • 궁미경 (성균관대학교 의과대학 산부인과학교실) ;
  • 강인수 (성균관대학교 의과대학 산부인과학교실) ;
  • 전진현 (삼성제일병원 생식생물학 및 불임연구실)
  • Lim, Chun-Kyu (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center) ;
  • Min, Dong-Mi (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center) ;
  • Lee, Hyoung-Song (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Young (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Koong, Mi-Kyoung (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Inn-Soo (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jun, Jin-Hyun (Laboratory of Reproductive Biology & Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center)
  • 발행 : 2003.06.30

초록

Objectives: The development of an useful method for obtaining metaphase chromosomes from a biopsied blastomere would allow differentiation between embryos with balanced and normal chromosome complements in the preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal translocations. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of microtubule depolymerizing agents (MTDAs) on the blastomeres of mouse and human preimplantation embryos, and to establish an effective method for obtaining metaphase chromosomes of biopsied blastomeres in human early embryos. Materials and Methods: Early embryos (2-4 cell stage) from superovulated mice (ICR strain) were collected and treated with single or mixture MTDAs, such as vinblastine, nocodazole and colcemid. After the treatment of MTDAs for 16 hours, the metaphase aquisition (MA) rates were evaluated by the observation of chromosome status with bis-benzimide or DAPI staining. The optimal condition from the above experiment was applied to human embryos, which were developed from abnormal fertilization (3-pronuclei). Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) with whole chromosome probes was conducted on the human metaphase chromosomes by the MTDAs. Results: In mouse embryos, the effective concentrations of each MTDAs for obtaining metaphase chromosomes were $1.0{\mu}M$ of vinblastine (20.3%), $5.0{\mu}M$ of nocodazole (28.1%) and $1.0{\mu}M$ colcemid (55.6%), respectively. The highest MA rate (91.2%) in the mouse embryos was obtained by a mixture of vinblastine ($1.0{\mu}M$) and nocodazole ($1.0{\mu}M$). In the human embryos, the metaphase chromosomes of blastomeres were obtained in 44 of 113 blastomeres (38.9%) by treatment of the mixture of vinblastine and nocodazole. FISH signals of the metaphase chromosomes were successfully observed in human individual blastomeres. Conclusions: The treatment of a mixture MTDAs for obtaining metaphase chromosomes was an efficient method, and the MA rate was above 90% in the mouse embryos. However, only a relatively small proportions of the blastomeres yielded metaphase chromosomes by the MTDAs in the human embryos. The inconsistent effects of MTDAs may be related to the variation of different species and the poor developmental potency of abnormally fertilized human embryos. We should develop more reliable and efficient methods for obtaining the metaphase chromosomes in the biopsied blastomeres of human preimplantation embryos.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Scriven PN, Handyside AH, Ogilvie M. Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 437-49 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199805)18:5<437::AID-PD278>3.0.CO;2-W
  2. Munne S, Bahce M, Schimmel T, Sadowy S, Cohen J. Case report: chromatid exchange and predivision of chromatids as other sources of abnormal oocytes detected by preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Prenant Diagn 1998; 18: 1450-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199812)18:13<1450::AID-PD509>3.0.CO;2-Q
  3. Van Assche E, Staessen C, Vegetti W, Bonduelle M, Vandervorst M, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and sperm analysis by fluorescent in-situ hybridization for the most common reciprocal translocation t(11;22). Mol Hum Reprod 1999; 5: 682-90 https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/5.7.682
  4. Griffin DK, Wilton LJ, Handyside AH, Winston RM, Delhanty JD. Dual fluorescent in-situ hybridization for simultaneous detection of X and Y chromosomespecific probes for the sexing of human preimplantation embryonic nuclei. Hum Genet 1992; 89: 18-22 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207035
  5. Munne S, Scott R, Sable D, Cohen J. First pregnancies after preconception diagnosis of translocations of maternal origin. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 675-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00568-2
  6. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Fung J, Gianaroli L, Cohen J, et al. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 1209-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00495-7
  7. Scriven PN, O'Mahony F, Bickerstaf H, Yeong C-T, Braude P, Ogilvie CM. Clinical pregnancy following blastomere biopsy and PGD for a reciprocal translocation carrier: analysis of meiotic outcomes and embryo quality in two IVF cycles. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 587-92 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0223(200007)20:7<587::AID-PD873>3.0.CO;2-W
  8. 임천규, 한미현, 전진현, 송견지, 김정욱, 박소연 등. 균형 전좌 또는 Robertsonian 전좌 보인자의 체외수정 및 배아이식술에서 형광직접보합법을 이용한 착상전 유전자 진단의 임상적 적용. 대한산부학회지 2000; 43(7): 1147-53
  9. 김진영, 임천규, 송인옥, 유근재, 양광문, 한국선 등. 유전질환 및 염색체 이상의 예방을 위한 착상전 유전진단의 결과. 대한불임학회지 2002; 29(4): 269-78
  10. Iwarsson E, Malmgren H, Inzunza J, Ahrlund-Richer L, Sjoblom P, Rosenlund B, et al. Highly abnormal cleavage divisions in preimplantation embryos from translocation carriers. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 1038-47 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0223(200012)20:13<1038::AID-PD976>3.0.CO;2-8
  11. Munne S, Weier HUG, Grifo J, Cohen J. Chromosome mosaicism in human embryos. Biol Reprod 1994; 51: 373-9 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod51.3.373
  12. Munne S, Alikani M, Grifo J, Cohen J. Monospermic polyploidy and atypical embryo morpholgy. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 506-10 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138536
  13. Verlinsky Y, Evsikov S. A simplified and efficient method for obtaining metaphase chromosomes from individual human blastomeres. Fertil Steril 1999; 72:1127-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00394-5
  14. Evsikov S, Verlinsky Y. Visualization of chromosomes in single human blastomeres. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16: 133-7 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022579731014
  15. Willadsen S, Levron J, Munne S, Schimmel T, Marquez C, Scoot R, et al. Rapid visualization of metaphase chromosomes in single human blastomeres after fusion with in-vitro matured bovine eggs. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 470-5 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.2.470
  16. Papadopoulos G, Templeton AA, Fisk N, Randall J. The frequency of chromosome anomalies in guman preimplantation embryos after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 91-8 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136853
  17. Micheli G, Fejgin M, Ghetler Y, Ben Nun I, Beyth Y, Amiel A. Chromosomal analysis of unfertilized oocytes and morphologically abnormal preimplantation embryos from an in vitro fertilization programm. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1990; 7:341-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130587
  18. Edirisinghe WR, Murch AR, Yovich JL. Cytogenetic analysis of human oocytes and embryos in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 1992; 7: 230-6 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137623