DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Potential of Mandarin Hybrid 'Shiranuhi' against inoculation of Bacterial Canker Disease Pathogen (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri) in Citrus Field in Jeju Island

  • Hyun, Jae-Wook (Plant Environment Division, National Jeju Agricultural Experiment Station, Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Myung, Inn-Shik (Plant Pathology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology (NIAST), RDA) ;
  • Lee, Seong-Chan (Plant Environment Division, National Jeju Agricultural Experiment Station, Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Sik (Plant Environment Division, National Jeju Agricultural Experiment Station, Rural Development Administration (RDA)) ;
  • Lim, Han-Cheol (Plant Environment Division, National Jeju Agricultural Experiment Station, Rural Development Administration (RDA))
  • Published : 2003.10.01

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate potential of Shiranuhi cultivar against inoculation of causal pathogen of citrus canker, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in Jeju Island by comparing degree of susceptibility of fruits and leaves/twigs, and analysis of incidence of canker disease. Progression of symptom, disease incidence, and percent area of lesion were surveyed for evaluation of resistance. In greenhouse condition, symptoms of bacterial citrus canker progressed more rapidly in sweet orange, a moderately susceptible cultivar, than in other four cultivars (satsuma mandarin, 'Kiyomi', 'Shiranuhi' and 'Yuzu'). At 20 days after inoculation, disease severity was the highest in sweet orange (5.0$\pm$0.0), and all tested leaves were distorted or had dropped. On the other hand, 'Yuzu' showed the lowest disease severity (2.6$\pm$0.47), followed by 'Kiyomi' (4.0$\pm$0.0), 'Shiranuhi' (4.0$\pm$0.82), and satsuma mandarin (4.3$\pm$0.47). Percent area of lesion per leaf 30 days after inoculation was the highest in sweet orange (8.31$\pm$1.78), followed by satsuma mandarin (1.51$\pm$1.25), 'Shiranuhi' (1.39$\pm$0.94), and 'Kiyomi' (1.1$\pm$0.9), while the lowest was in 'Yuzu' (0.26$\pm$0.17). Infield condition, percentage of diseased leaf in 'Shiranuhi' was very low, 5.2$\pm$2.9, compared with sweet orange, 71.0$\pm$ 11.5, while that of satsuma mandarin and 'Kiyomi' were 6.9$\pm$7.0 and 4.3$\pm$2.0, respectively. Percentages of diseased leaf was higher (17.4$\pm$7.1) than that of diseased fruit (3.2$\pm$2.5) in severely diseased trees of Shiranuhi cultivar, and the disease was not observed on twig in open field condition. Lesion sizes on leaves and fruits in open field condition were 4.1$\pm$2.2 mm2 and 5.1$\pm$5.6 mm2, respectively, while those in greenhouse condition were 8.7$\pm$5.7 mm2, 10.4$\pm$9.2 mm2 and 5.6$\pm$2.6 mm2 on leaves, fruits and twigs, respectively. The disease was observed in 5.6% out of total 107 farmers Shiranuhi fields under polyethylene film house, and average percentages of diseased tree in 31 fields of Shiranuhi cultivar and adjacent satsuma mandarin fields were 0.02% and 14.8%, respectively. Average percentage of diseased fruit was 1.6% in satsuma mandarin which was not observed in anyone of all the 31 Shiranuhi farmers fields. Therefore, it was concluded that 'Shiranuhi' cultivar is not potential against causal pathogen of citrus canker disease in Jeju Island because the cultivar has similar resistance as satsuma mandarin which occupies over 95% of total 25,000 ha in Jeju Island in polyethylene film houses protected from outside.

Keywords

References

  1. Egel, D. S., Graham, J. H. and Riley, T. D. 1991. Population dynamics of strains of Xanthomonas campestris differing in aggressiveness on Swingle citrimelo and grapefruit. Phytopa-thology 81:666-671 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-81-666
  2. Gottwald, T. R. and Graham, J. H. 2000. Bacterial Diseases. pp. 5-8 in: Compendium of Citrus Diseases, 2nd ed. L. W. Timmer, S. M. Garnsey, and J. H. Graham, eds. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN
  3. Gottwald, T. R., Graham, J. H., Civerolo, E. L., Barrett, H. C. and Hearn, C. J. 1993. Differential host range reaction of citrus and citrus relatives to citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot determined by leaf mesophyll susceptibility. Plant Dis. 77:1004-1009 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-77-1004
  4. Gottwald, T. R., Hughes, G., Graham, J. H., Sun, X. and Riley, T. 2000. The citrus canker epidemics in Florida: The scientific basis of regulatory eradication policy for an invasive species. Phytopathology 90:30-34
  5. Graham, J. H., Gottwald, T. R. and Fardelmann, D. 1990. Culti-var-specific interactions for strains of Xanthomonas campestris from Florida that cause citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot. Plant Dis. 74:753-756 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-74-0753
  6. Graham, J. H., Gottwald, T. R., Riley, T. D. and Achor, D. 1992. Penetration through leaf stomata and growth of strains of Xanthomonas campestris in citrus cultivars varying in susceptibility to bacterial diseases. Phytopathology 82:1319-1325 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-82-1319
  7. Koizumi, M. and Kuhara, S. 1982. Evaluation of citrus plants for resistances to bacterial canker disease in relation to lesion extension. Bull. Fruit Tree Res. Stn. Jpn. D-4:73-92
  8. Matsumoto, R. 2001. 'Shiranuhi', a late-maturing citrus cultivar. Bull. Natl. Inst. Fruit Tree Sci. 35:115-120
  9. Matsumoto, R. and Okudai, N. 1988. An early evaluation of citrus Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri by a needle-prick inoculation. Bull. Fruit Tree Res. Stn. D. 10:11-23
  10. Myung, I.-S., Nam, K.-W. and Kwon, H.-M. 2003. Dispersal of citrus bacterial canker caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in nursery plots of Unshiu orange. Plant Pathol. J. 19:205-209 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2003.19.4.205
  11. Provost, O., Boher, B., Brocherieux, C., Nicole, M. and Chiroleu, F. 2002. Survival of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri in leaf lesions under tropical environmental conditions and simulated splash dispersal of inoculum. Phytopathology 92:336-346 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.4.336
  12. Stall, R. E., Canteros de E., B. I. and Marco, G. 1982. Importance of mesophyll in mature-leaf resistance to cancrosis of citrus. Phytopathology 72: 1097-1100 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-72-1097
  13. Stall, R. E., Miller, J. W. and Canteros De Echenique, B. I. 1980. Population dynamics of Xanthomonas citri causing cancrosis of citrus in Argentina. Proe. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 93: 10-14
  14. Timmer, L. W., Gottwald, T. R. and Zitko, S. E. 1991. Bacterial exudation from lesions of Asiatic citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot. Plant Dis. 75:192-195 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-75-0192

Cited by

  1. The role as inoculum sources of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri surviving on the infected Satsuma mandarin fruits vol.52, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-014-3366-z
  2. Citrus junos as a host of citrus bacterial canker vol.15, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4876