Biofilter에서 체류시간이 혼합 벤젠과 에틸렌 분해에 미치는 영향

Effect of Residence time on Mixed Benzene and Ethylene Degradation in Biofilters

  • 발행 : 2003.03.01

초록

토양 및 지하수 복원 과정에서 벤젠과 에틸렌이 혼합되어 배출될 경우 이를 biofilter에 의해 처리한 결과, 에틸렌은 생분해가 잘 되지 않는 화합물인데도 불구하고 체류시간이 10~15분에서는 96%이상 높은 생물학적 처리를 보여 biofilter운전 가능성이 제시되었다. 2~15분 체류시간에서 혼합 VOCs중 벤젠은 모든 조건에서 100% 제거되었다. 체류시간이 15분일 경우 벤젠과 에틸렌의 최대 제거능은 각각 4.3과 1.4g/$\textrm{m}^3$hr로서 벤젠이 에틸렌에 비해 3배 정도 컸다. 체류시간이 작을수록 에틸렌 분해율 감소로 인하여 이산화탄소 발생도 감소함을 발견하였으며 벤젠과 에틸렌이 모두 제거되는 운전에서 최고 이산화탄소 발생률은 3,169 [mg-$CO_2$/(g-${C_2}{H_4}$${C_6}{H_6}$)]이었다. 벤젠 산화 미생물은 Bacillus mycoides와 Pseudomonas fluorescens로 동정되었고, 에틸렌 산화 미생물은 Pseudomonas putida와 Pseudomonas fluorescens로 각각 동정되었다.

A biofilter study was performed in order to remove mixed benzene and ethylene emitted from soil and groundwater remediation. In particular, more than 96% of ethylene was removed at residence times of 10~15 min, and the possibility of use of the biofilter was obtained. The benzene removal efficiency was achieved as much as 100% at residence times of 2~15 min. With a residence time of 15 min, the maximum elimination capacity of benzene and ethylene was 4.3 g/$\textrm{m}^3$hr and 1.4 g/$\textrm{m}^3$hr, respectively. The maximum elimination capacity of benzene was 3 times higher than that of ethylene. Carbon dioxide concentration decreased as residence times were lowered due to low ethylene degradation rate. The maximum carbon dioxide production rate of 3,169 [mg-$CO_2$/(g-${C_2}{H_4}$${C_6}{H_6$)] was investigated when benzene and ethylene were completely removed. It was found that dominant bacteria in the benzene-degrading microorganisms were identified as Bacillus mycoides and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Dominant bacteria in the ethylene-degrading microorganisms were identified as Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas fluorescens.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ergas, S. J., Schroeder, E. D., Chang, D. P. Y. and Morton, R., 'Control of volatile organic compound emissions from a POTW using a compost biofilter,' Presentation at the 85th Annual Meeting & Exhibition of AWMA, Kansas City, Missouri, USA, 92-116.02 (1992)
  2. Ottengraf, S. P. P., 'Exhaust gas purification,' Biotechnology, Rehm, H.-J., Reed, G. Edition, VCH, Weinheim, 8 (1986)
  3. Prokop, W. H. and Bohn, H. L., 'Soil bed system for control of rendering plant odors,' J. Air Pollution Control Association, 35(12), pp. 1332-1338 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1985.10466036
  4. Abeles, F. B., 'Ethylene as an air pollutant,' Agric. For. Bulletin, 5, pp. 4-12 (1982)
  5. Freedman, D. L. and S. D. Herz, 'Use of ethylene and ethane as primary substrates for aerobic cometabolism of vinyl chloride,' Water Ervironment Research, 68(3), pp. 320-328 (1996) https://doi.org/10.2175/106143096X127767
  6. Chitwood, D. E. and Devinny, J. S., 'Evaluation of a twostage biofilter for treatment of POTW waste air,' Environmental Progress, 18(3), pp. 212-221(1999) https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670180318
  7. Kim, J. O. and Lee, W. B., 'Biodegradation of gaseous benzene with microbial consortium in a biofilter,' Environmental Technology, 23(4), pp. 437-444 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332508618401
  8. van Ginkel, C. G., Welten, H. G. J. and de Bont, J. A. M., 'Growth and stability of ethene-utilizing bacteria on compost at very low substrate concentrations,' FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 45, pp. 65-69 (1987)
  9. Elsgaard, L., 'Ethylene removal by a biofilter with immobilized bacteria,' Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64(11), pp. 4168-4173 (1998)
  10. Mackay, D. and Shiu, W. Y., 'A critical review of Henry's law constant for chemicals of environmental interest,' J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 10(4), pp. 1175-1190 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555654
  11. Lehr, J., Hyman, M, Gass, T. E. and Seevers, W. J., Handbook of complex environmental remediation problems, McGraw-Hill Co., (2002)