한국농림기상학회지 (Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)

  • 제5권3호
  • /
  • Pages.166-171
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 1229-5671(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1859(eISSN)
한국농림기상학회 (Korean Society of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)
권호 표지

토양 중 NaCl 농도에 따른 느티나무의 생리적 특성 변화

Changes of Physiological Properties of Zelkova serrata to NaCl Concentration in Soil

  • 발행 : 2003.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 가로수의 염류 피해 원인을 밝히고, 생리생화학적 내성 특성을 구명하고자 하였다. 공시재료는 2년생 느티나무를 사용하였으며, NaCl을 0, 3, 14, 56, 112mM로 토양에 처리한 후, 근원경, 형성층 전기저항치와 잎 내 탄수화물 및 이온 함량 등을 측정하여 생리적인 피해 반응을 비교 분석하였다. 느티나무는 NaCl처리에 의해 생리적인 대사과정이 저해를 받은 것으로 나타났다. 특히 염류농도가 증가함에 따라 활력이 감소하였으며, 체내 이온농도가 변하여 이온 불균형이 발생하였다. 이러한 결과는 염류 처리에 의해 식물의 뿌리에서 수분 흡수력이 저해되면서 수분 스트레스가 유발되었기 때문인 것으로 판단된다. 반면 생장과 체내 탄수화물 대사에는 큰 영향을 주지 않았는데, 이것은 NaCl 처리 농도가 너무 낮았거나 처리 기간이 너무 짧았기 때문인 것으로 판단된다. 그러나 느티나무 가로수가 장기적으로 염류에 노출되었을 경우, 생장에 심각한 장애가 발생할 것으로 예측된다.

This study was conducted to investigate the negative physiological impact of saline to roadside trees and to assess the physio-biochemical tolerant characters of woody plants against salinity. Two-year-old Zelkova serrata seedlings treated with 0, 3, 14, 56, and 112 mM NaCl were measured for root collar diameter and cambial electric resistance (as an indication of vitality) and analyzed for carbohydrate and mineral content in the leaves. Z. serrata was affected by NaCl treatments. The vitality of Z. serrata decreased with an increase in NaCl concentration, and the NaCl treatment resulted in nutrient imbalance shown by changes of ion concentration in the tissues. However, relative growth rate for diameter and carbohydrate metabolism in the leaves were not greatly influenced by NaCl treatment. Short-term treatment or low NaCl concentration may not have an observed impact on growth. Nevertheless, roadside trees exposed to saline during the long term would likely show negative effects for growth performance from altered ion concentrations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ashraf, M. and M. Tufail, 1995: Variation in salinity tolerance in sunflower(Helianthus annuus L.). Journal of Agronomy Crop Science, 174, 351-362.
  2. Benyon, R. G., N. E. Marcar, S. Theiveyanathan, W. M. Tunningley and A. T. Nicholson, 2001: Species differences in transpiration on a saline discharge site. Agricultural Water Management, 50, 65-81.
  3. Borchert, R. 1994: Electric resistance as a measure of tree water status during seasonal drought in tropical dry forest in Costa Rica. Tree Physiology, 14, 299-312.
  4. Cramer, G. R. and R. S. Nowak, 1992: Supplemental manganese improves the relative growth, net assimilation and photosynthetic rates of salt-stressed barley. Physiologia Plantarum, 84, 600-605.
  5. Dahiya, S. S. and M. Singh, 1976: Effect of salinity, alkalinity and iron application on the availability of iron, manganese, phosphorus and sodium in pea(Pisum sativum L.) crop. Plant Soil, 44, 697-702.
  6. Dvorak, J., M. Edge and K. Ross, 1988: On the evaluation of the adaptation of Lohopyrum elongatum to growth in saline environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 85, 3805-3809.
  7. Fostad, O. and P. A. Pedersen, 1997: Vitality, variation and cause of decline of trees in Oslo center(Norway). Journal of Arboriculture, 23, 155-165.
  8. Gao, Z., M. Sagi and S. H. Lips, 1998: Carbohydrate metabolism in leaves and assimilate partitioning in fruits of tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum L.) as affected by salinity. Plant Science, 135, 149-159.
  9. Garcia-Sánchez, F., J. L. Jifon, M. Carvajal and J. P. Syvertsen, 2002: Gas exchange, chlorophyll and nutrient contents in relation to $Na^+$ and $Cl^-$ accumulation in ‘Sunburst’ mandarin grafted on different rootstocks. Plant Science, 162, 705-712.
  10. Grattan, S. R. and C. M. Grieve, 1999: Salinity-mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Scientia Horticulture, 78, 127-157.
  11. Greenway, H. and R. Munns, 1980: Mechanisms of salt tolerance in non-halophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 31, 149-190.
  12. Gregorio, G. B., D. Senadhira and R. D. Mendonza, 2002: Progress in breeding for salinity tolerance and associated abiotic stresses in rice. Field Crops Research, 76, 91-101.
  13. Helal, H. M. and K. Mengal, 1981: Interaction between light intensity and NaCl salinity and their effects on growth, $CO_2$ assimilation and photosynthate conversion in young broad beans. Plant Physiology, 67, 999-1002. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.67.5.999
  14. Hendry, G. A. F. and A. H. Price, 1993: Stress indicators; chlorophylls and carotenoids. Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology: A laboratory Manual, G. A. F. Hendry and J. P. Grime, (Eds.) Chapman & Hall, 148-152.
  15. Huber, S. C. and L. J. Huber, 1992: Role of sucrosephosphate synthase in sucrose metabolism in leaves. Plant Physiology, 99, 1275-1278.
  16. Kang, B.-H. and S.-I. Shim, 1998: Screening of saline tolerant plants and development of biological monitoring technique for saline stress. I. Survey of vegetation in saline region and determination of saline tolerance of the plant species of the region. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 17, 26-33.
  17. Kelsey, P. and R. Hootman, 1990; Soil resource evaluation for a group of sidewalk street tree planters. Journal of Arboriculture, 16, 113-117.
  18. Khattak, R. A. and W. M. Jarrell, 1989: Effect of saline irrigation waters on soil manganese leaching and bioavailability to sugar beet. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 53, 142-146.
  19. Lee, K. J., S. H. Han and Y. S. Jeong, 1997: Differences between species and seasonal changes in cambial electrical resistance of twenty ornamental tree species. Journal of Korean Forestry Society, 86, 415-421.
  20. Lips, S. H., 1998: Nitrogen, stress and plant growth regulation, Nitrogen Nutrition and Plant Growth. H. S. Srivastava and R. P. Singh, (Eds.) Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India, 283-304.
  21. Marschner, H. 1995: Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, 889pp.
  22. Page, A. L., A. C. Chang and D. C. Adriano, 1990: Deficiencies and toxicities of trace elements. Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management, Chapter 7, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Eng. Practice No. 71, ASCE, 138-160.
  23. Rios-Gonzalez, K., L. Erdei and S. H. Lips, 2002: The activity of antioxidant enzymes in maize and sunflower seedlings as affected by salinity and different nitrogen sources. Pant Science, 162, 1-8.
  24. Robinson, J. M. and R. A. Rowland, 1996: Carbohydrate and carbon metabolite accumulation responses in leaves of ozone tolerant and ozone susceptible spinach plants after acute ozone exposure. Photosynthesis Research, 50, 103-115.
  25. Ruiz, D., V. Martinez and A. Cerda, 1997: Citrus response to salinity: growth and nutrient uptake. Tree Physiology, 17, 141-150.
  26. Shalhevet, J., 1993: Plants under salt and water stress. Plant Adaptation to Environmental Stress. L. Fowden, T. Mansfield and J. Stoddat, (Eds.), Chapman & Hall, 133- 154.
  27. Shim, S.-I., S.-G. Lee and B. H. Kang, 1998: Screening of saline tolerant plants and development of biological monitoring technique for saline stress. II. Responses of emergence and early growth of several crop species to saline stress. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 17, 122-126.
  28. Shortle, W. C., J. Abusamra, F. M. Laing and M. F. Morselli, 1979: Electrical resistance as a guide to thinning sugar maples. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 9, 436-437.
  29. Song, K.-J., S.-H. Han and T.-J. Ha, 2002: Studies on the physiological characteristics and cambial electrical resistance of street trees in Cheonan city. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 16, 46-54.
  30. Sudhakar, C., A. Lakshmi and S. Giridarakumar, 2001: Changes in the antioxidant enzyme efficacy in two high yielding genotypes of mulberry(Morus alba L.) under NaCl salinity. Plant Science, 161, 613-619.
  31. Townsend, A. M., 1980: Response of selected tree species to sodium chloride. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 105, 878-883.
  32. Townsend, A. M., 1984: Effect of sodium chloride on tree seedlings in two potting media. Environmental Pollution, 34, 333-344.